Hi,
We sold a property & it settled last week. We’ve approached the RE agent who managed our prop to finalise funds for water usage from the tenants. they’ve come back & said we need to approach the tenant directly. This doesn’t sound right. Any thoughts? This is in QLD.-
This topic was modified 7 years, 9 months ago by
jambv.
Hi Jambv,
This doesn’t sound right. Any thoughts?
Sounds to me like the RE agent might have already given the tenant back their bond – unless you sold with the tenant “in place”.
Had you previously sought reparation via the RE agent (like 3 months prior)? Or was this a last-minute thought bubble? Was the house/unit on its own separate meter? If not, forget it.
Even if it is metered, Qld has laws that are less kindly to landlords in that regard. It has been a while for me, but it went something like “You could not charge a tenant for ‘reasonable usage’ – only for excess water usage”.
Benny
The agent is not making any money out of chasing a a tenant like this – approach directly.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
The agent is not making any money out of chasing a a tenant like this – approach directly.
Perhaps not, but it’s still their duty to finalise the tenancy with the tenant, isn’t it? I would talk to the RE principal and if needed, contact the governing body and lodge a complaint. Can’t see myself chasing tenants directly. That’s exactly why you pay a property manager…
Ethan Timor | Aligned Finance Pty Ltd
http://www.alignedfinance.com.au/
Email Me | Phone MeActive Investor & Broker; Based in Northern NSW, servicing Australia wide; Author of '34 Proven Ways to Maximise Your Borrowing Power' (download free from our website)
-
This topic was modified 7 years, 9 months ago by
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. If you don't have an account, you can register here.
