All Topics / General Property / Marketing via REA's Premiere Property Listings

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Profile photo of aljcaljc
    Participant
    @aljc
    Join Date: 2015
    Post Count: 1

    Hi all
    (my first posting so go easy…)
    I’ve been recommended by selling agents to market my two adjoining properties in Brisbane using a “Premiere Property” Listing on realestate.com.au
    The cost (~$2k) for this listing i would need to pay for upfront. Also recommended is a large signboard – cost ~$500.
    The recommended marketing campaign is aimed at attracting competitive tenders on the site from developers/builders/investors.

    My questions/points for discussion are:
    a) does this group consider that a “Premiere Property” Listing adds value relative to the (significantly) increased cost above other types of listings.
    b) should marketing costs be paid by the vendor upfront or covered by the selling agent – or ‘split’ on some basis so that both parties put some skin in the game and work towards securing a successful sale.
    Keen to hear peoples thoughts & experiences

    Profile photo of BennyBenny
    Moderator
    @benny
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,416

    Hi Aljc,
    Hmm, since nobody has “got up to dance”, I thought I would add my views on your question. I’m not a professional, so my words are “just another opinion” to be thought about, taken up, or discarded – whatever suits you.

    My reaction to your question was to mutter “Seems to me these are Sales Agents alright – and they are doing a big Sell on you”. See, I am of the opinion that, with the tools available today, your property will be jumped all over without the need for a “Whoop-de-do Premiere anything”. The property itself is the Premiere piece, and developers and the like will be sniffing around for just such opportunities (or will have their “hound dogs” doing it for them).

    As well as that, most worthwhile RE agents will have a list a kilometre long of “their own buyers” for your property. If they don’t, there will be other Agents beating a path to your door to take the listing OFF them first agent, and sign you up themselves.

    So, WHAT are you paying for? Your ad stays at the top of each page? Given that the hounds are already going to be looking for it, they won’t NEED to see it on every page.

    A big sign outside the gate – SURE !! Makes sense to me… but why should YOU pay for it? It is THEIR name that will be being advertised, and you WILL be paying their commission (you know, the one that once was “No more than 5% of the first $18k plus 2.5% of the remainder of the purchase price” – which steadily evolved into “No LESS and no more than 5% of the first $18k plus 2.5% of the remainder of the purchase price”. i.e. Not a MAXIMUM any more – just an accepted NORM – just try to offer them less !!

    Let them pay for both if they think it will help so much.

    What say others? ;)

    Benny

    Profile photo of TheNewGuyTheNewGuy
    Participant
    @thenewguy
    Join Date: 2014
    Post Count: 151

    I agree with Benny. Was this from one agent or from multiple agents? I’d get a second fourth or twentieth opinion.

    It sounds like the selling agent is trying to retire from this one sale :)

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 3 months ago by Profile photo of TheNewGuy TheNewGuy.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. If you don't have an account, you can register here.