All Topics / Help Needed! / Positive or negative geared property?
Hi there,
My wife and I are looking into buying our first investment property. I've read up on both positive and negative gearing strategies, but can't decide which path to go down.
I like the idea of having multiple properties all earning money, as opposed to one or two costing money for a long period. I have no fear of debt so having 2 or 3+ million worth of debt to earn $2k a week doesn't scare me.
Ive looked around and it seems most + geared properties are in country areas so not as much capital growth. That also seems to be what a lot of Internet sites say.
But if we are making money as opposed to spending money, by the time the – geared properties are in a good position we would have spent half the profit keeping it.
Can you guys help me out a bit? What does every one recommend?
Thanks
Hi brmiau
You're right. Generally speaking – properties that are truly cash flow positive are usually found in regional/rural and/or mining areas. There are exceptions of course.
Personally, I look for properties that aren't overly burdensome too hold (so have a decent yield) but are usually slightly CF- (or close to neutral after tax) but are also likely to generate some growth over the longer term – or can be renovated easily/cheaply to gain value. I also prefer to buy in larger cities rather than regional (but it's different for everyone).
The problem with cheap, regional CF+ properties are that many are in locations where growth can be extremely slow – and in my opinion, without growth, it's going to be difficult to grow a portfolio. You might find that you've made a few thousand dollars in 5 years time – but your property may not have gone up in value.
Cheers
Jamie
Jamie Moore | Pass Go Home Loans Pty Ltd
http://www.passgo.com.au
Email Me | Phone MeMortgage Broker assisting clients Australia wide Email: [email protected]
You need a mixture of both CF and CG unless you earn big money and can afford large out of pocket expenses.
Sometimes people have some of both. That way the +CF helps ease the pain of the -CF. You can only hold so many -CF properties before you can't afford to hold them.
Also what's your end goal. Mine was to buy quickly then retire quickly so I needed cashflow in order to get me there.
Hi Brmiau,
At present you can buy nearly any investment property in any area and provided you earn around $75,000 per annum your investment property will be positively geared with as little as a 5% deposit.
There are obviously many variables that contribute towards a property being positively or negatively geared, however the major factors that are contributing towards properties being positively geared in city areas at present are higher rental yields (can get yields in investment properties of at least 5.5% p.a. in many cases now with very low vacancy rates) which have been increasing over the past 4 – 5 years due to the increase in renters vs buyers in many city areas and of course the historically low interest rates we have at present (Lowest interest rates in 54 years).
If you want any examples of current actual's to look over and review, contact me and I will issue you many current examples.
Dave Ward | Geronimo Finance
http://www.geronimofinance.com.au
Email Me | Phone MeProperty Investor, Property Investment Expert & Advisor, Finance Expert & Strategist
Catalyst wrote:Also what's your end goal.Thats a good question and a good place to start would be to work out an answer.
Colin Rice | CDR Finance
http://cdrfinance.com.au/
Email Me | Phone MePerth Based Mortgage Broker - Investment Property Finance Specialist | E: [email protected]
Catalyst, my goal is the same as yours. Buy lots of CF+ properties and live off the money coming in. Then continue to buy more and more properties.
I might have my head in the clouds I'm not sure. That's what I'd love for me and my family. I'm 28 so I don't expect it to be retired by 30 but 40 could be achievable.
I have searched a lot of properties in rural areas like Ararat and Broken Hill, and I found 15-20 all CF+ by average $60 pw. That was searching for 30 minutes. I would imagine I'd start off buying one or two, then continue to buy more and more until I've fully covered my working wage (around $100k) then retire, while still buying more properties.
Is that possible or am I in a fantasy land?
Possible.
But you want a mixture of CF+ and good CG properties, as the CG properties funds the equity and CF takes care of the serviceability.
With your current cash, how many can you buy with an 10% deposit + stamp duty— presuming none of the properties goes up in value in the next 3 years.
Sit down and look at your financial and where you see yourself in 2,3,5 years time and work out a "investment strategy" and game plan with budgeting.
Mick C | Shape Home Loans
http://www.shapehomeloans.com.au/
Email Me | Phone MeSame Banks. Better Rates. Served With a Passion.
We have $240k left on our mortgage and the property is worth $440k. So I could tap into the equity. Most properties I've looked at are between $75-$130k so with 10% plus stamp duty so we could buy 3 or 4 I suppose? We are setting up a meeting with our bank to find out exactly the situation. We currently pay double on our repayments for the mortgage.
Idealy in 2 years I would like to have between 5-10 properties and in 5 years maybe 20 or so, maybe more if it is all going well. Looking at retiring from work to concentrate on property within 3-5 years after that with around 50 properties. Hopefully earning $4-5k a week.
I know it probably seems a bit ambitious or naive or silly, but that's what I want.
Hi Brmiau,
I like your attitude my friend, if you can write down your plan and run a cash flow analysis and the numbers add up – why not!
You should probably budget for interest rate rises when doing your calculations. It looks like rates were up to 8% just 5 years ago.
brmiau wrote:We are setting up a meeting with our bank to find out exactly the situation.Granted I am biased but that concerns me!
Colin Rice | CDR Finance
http://cdrfinance.com.au/
Email Me | Phone MePerth Based Mortgage Broker - Investment Property Finance Specialist | E: [email protected]
Why does that concern you? It's only to find out how much we can use to invest through equity etc… Then we'll make the call on what we are going to do.
Bad idea?
brmiau wrote:Why does that concern you? It's only to find out how much we can use to invest through equity etc… Then we'll make the call on what we are going to do.Bad idea?
Hi brmiau
I'm obviously a broker – so this will come across as biased but a lot of bankers (and brokers for that matter) don't know the first thing when it comes to loan structures for investors.
Your current bank will also be restricted to their own in-house products and you'll be at the mercy of their own borrowing capacity calculations.
Cheers
Jamie
Jamie Moore | Pass Go Home Loans Pty Ltd
http://www.passgo.com.au
Email Me | Phone MeMortgage Broker assisting clients Australia wide Email: [email protected]
Hi brmiau
Do yourself and your future a huge favour and cancel your appointment with the bank.
Instead you want a broker that genuinely knows how to make you wealthy. Your bank does not know how to do that, and is not motivated to do so.
You've decided what you want, so the best thing you can do is surround yourself with people who know how to get you to your goal because they have done it themselves. Starting with your broker.
Jacqui Middleton | Middleton Buyers Advocates
http://www.middletonbuyersadvocates.com.au
Email Me | Phone MeVIC Buyers' Agents for investors, home buyers & SMSFs.
brmiau wrote:We have $240k left on our mortgage and the property is worth $440k.1. Presuming your going for an 80% equity release – you have $112,000 usable equity –and this is based on the bank valuing your property at $440,000..
brmiau wrote:Most properties I've looked at are between $75-$130k so with 10% plus stamp duty so we could buy 3 or 4 I suppose?Not sure where your buying but from exp property under $150,000 falls into 4 groups ( im generalizing here…)
– Regional towns
– Low population
– Small units ( 1 bedroom or studio's most likely)
– Over 55's or service apartments.
^ Not the type of deal a standard bank will want on their books at 90% LVR- but as i said it depends on the location and type of property.
Gopod start- http://www.genworth.com.au/lender-centre/tools-and-resources/location-guide-australia/ type in the postcode here and if it's a cat 3 or not even on this list chances are your bank may not support that area at the LVR you want.
brmiau wrote:Idealy in 2 years I would like to have between 5-10 properties and in 5 years maybe 20 or so, maybe more if it is all going well. Looking at retiring from work to concentrate on property within 3-5 years after that with around 50 properties. Hopefully earning $4-5k a week.
Possible; but you need good planning skills and speak to someone who has either done something similar or know what they are doing from an investors point of view.
Property investing requires time, 1-2 mistakes could possible make stop you on your track.
You have a "end picture" now you need the plans to execute. if you know how to execute; all good…if you have no idea – seek help from someone who does- ie a property mentor or an experienced investor.
Mick C | Shape Home Loans
http://www.shapehomeloans.com.au/
Email Me | Phone MeSame Banks. Better Rates. Served With a Passion.
Shape, I definitely need to speak to someone/people who can point me in the right direction. Preferably someone who has done it and succeeded.
i wouldn't be foolish enough to jump right into it with my lack of knowledge.
Anyone recommend someone located in Melbourne?
Also Shape, the properties I looked at are in major regional areas.
Hey Brmiau,
My husband and I are also 28 and dream big and our plan is very similar to yours.
We currently own two properties and very much at the start of my investment journey.
One thing i found very useful is going to lots of free seminars and reading heaps of taxation books. (this is where you think… boring tax??) but the most important lesson i have learnt so far is how to protect yourself, with my favourite saying being "own nothing control everything"
(assuming your not an accountant?)
My view would be go see you bank manager ask him how much equity you can access (but don't sign anything) This is always something nice to know and there is no harm is asking.
The Main difference ive found between a broker and the bank manager is a broker generally have better knowledge on how to structure yourself to be able to purchase more property, they will suggest refinancing your p.i loan to a interest only loan so you have more spare income for the banks to approve loan after loan.
Next and the most important is going see an accountant. if you wish to buy heaps of properties and wanting to hold them as investments then i would suggest you set up a trust. A trust is like an invisible person who's name is on all the properties so if someone sued u they couldn't access the value in your properties or force u to sell them. A trust is also useful to control how much tax you pay. The reason i suggest a trust before purchase is because to start a trust after you purchase you have to pay the land tax/stamp duty again to change the name. I am not an accountant so can only share the basic understanding i have but its also worth asking your broker about getting home loans through trusts. as some banks are harder than others and might advise a trust later down the track
Anyway good luck and i hope your dreams become a reality.
brmiau wrote:Idealy in 2 years I would like to have between 5-10 properties and in 5 years maybe 20 or so, maybe more if it is all going well. Looking at retiring from work to concentrate on property within 3-5 years after that with around 50 properties. Hopefully earning $4-5k a week.I know it probably seems a bit ambitious or naive or silly, but that's what I want.
It's great that you have a goal but it looks like pie in the sky stuff (correct me if I'm wrong). How will you get there? You need to have a plan as well as a goal.
How are you going to support yourself in 3-5 years with 10 properties? If you have, say 10 properties like you mentioned with $60pw cashflow then that's $600pw. Not bad. But is that clear? ie not including tax benefits? and including ongoing costs? What about maintenance etc?
In lots of low population etc areas rents (and prices) can remain stagnant. In order to keep up with the cost of living (inflation) rents need to be rising and/or you need CG.
You are on the right track. Keep researching and asking questions. There is a wealth of knowledge here. Agree with the bank comments. That's not the best place to go to for advice to get you where you want to go.
Jamie M wrote:brmiau wrote:Why does that concern you? It's only to find out how much we can use to invest through equity etc… Then we'll make the call on what we are going to do.Bad idea?
Hi brmiau
I'm obviously a broker – so this will come across as biased but a lot of bankers (and brokers for that matter) don't know the first thing when it comes to loan structures for investors.
Your current bank will also be restricted to their own in-house products and you'll be at the mercy of their own borrowing capacity calculations.
Cheers
Jamie
Hi brmiau,
This is very true what Jamie has stated. You need to make sure the loan structure is right for your circumstances and not just what the bank can provide you. We see it all the time with our clients coming to us to buy a property.
If you are looking to build a portfolio, your most important asset in the whole process is a good mortgage broker!
Look it probably is pie in the sky stuff to be honest, but in saying that I can see how it is achievable. It's not going to happen over night, but in 10 years time it seems very possible. I have purchased books to give me more understanding.
In reference to the 10 properties, I wouldn't retire on $600 pw less tax, maintainence etc.. The figure would be more like $250pw clear. No one can retire on that. But if I could continue to build my portfolio each year, then 10 turns into 20, 30, 50 and so on. I would basically lose half the rent return in tax, but all other expenses I can claim back.
I will read the books, contact a mortgage broker and talk to them about what to do.
Hi, sounds like you are thinking along the right path. Keep reading and you will find things that click with you.
Don't forget that rents go up too.
I remember Nathan Birch telling me that his initial goal was to buy 10 properties. He planned on putting the rent up $10pw on each one every year, so after 10 years he'd have $50,000 a year to live on. Nice initial goal. I think he achieved that in a few years. He made his first million at 21. He now has 150 properties and he's not even 30 yet.
Most people actually out surpass their goals. Set a realistic smaller goal and outline how you will get there. Then start at step 1 and go from there. The rest will follow.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. If you don't have an account, you can register here.