All Topics / Legal & Accounting / First investment property in Sydney (Tax help please!)
Hello all, first post and new to the forum…
My name is dom and I am looking to purchase my first investment property in Sydney eastwood. (a town house – budgeted around 600k) Currently, I am making around 150k and wife on around 80k. The purpose of the investment is mainly for a. Tax deduction on negative gearing and hoping for some CG in the future. I wanted to ask a few questions and your thought are much appreciated…
1. Should I move in and live there first to avoid CGT in the future?
2. Except from the interest expenses, is there any other expenses (significant) that are tax deductable?
3. I am thinking to ask my parents to move into the townhouse in a couple of years time (what are the tax implication after they move in?) or should I structure the investment differently?
4. Should the property title under my name/wife/or joint??
Many Thanks for your help,
Dom
Hi there
I'm not an accountant so won't get into the specifics of your taxation related questions.
As a general comment though – I would never purchase an IP with the main motivator being to reduce your tax billed. The logic is flawed – you need to lose a dollar to get 40 cents back.
While the tax cuts associated with IPs are fantastic, I'd only view them as an added bonus.
Cheers
Jamie
Jamie Moore | Pass Go Home Loans Pty Ltd
http://www.passgo.com.au
Email Me | Phone MeMortgage Broker assisting clients Australia wide Email: [email protected]
dongbell wrote:Hello all, first post and new to the forum…My name is dom and I am looking to purchase my first investment property in Sydney eastwood. (a town house – budgeted around 600k) Currently, I am making around 150k and wife on around 80k. The purpose of the investment is mainly for a. Tax deduction on negative gearing and hoping for some CG in the future. I wanted to ask a few questions and your thought are much appreciated…
1. Should I move in and live there first to avoid CGT in the future?
2. Except from the interest expenses, is there any other expenses (significant) that are tax deductable?
3. I am thinking to ask my parents to move into the townhouse in a couple of years time (what are the tax implication after they move in?) or should I structure the investment differently?
4. Should the property title under my name/wife/or joint??
Many Thanks for your help,
Dom
1. If you don’t have any other property that is your main residence then you should consider doing this.
2. Yes. Non cash deductions such as depreciation of fixtures and fittings.
3. Will they be paying market rent? If so then generally no tax issues, if not then you cannot claim deductions in full.
4. This will depend on about 10 different things you should consider besides tax.Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Its not a very stable strategy to purchase property based primarily on negative gearing. Why do you want to lose money and hope for CG in the future?
There are no issues with negative gearing however have a plan to turn it into either cashflow positive property or ascertain CG/equity to build your portfolio from there.
You can claim one property at a time as your PPOR so look at your longer term plan it may worthwhile living in the property first and then renting it out.
Regards
Shahin
TheFinanceShop | Elite Property Finance
http://www.elitepropertyfinance.com
Email Me | Phone MeResidential and Commercial Brokerage
Thanks a lot for the prompt reply guys.
I was thinking to put minimum initial deposit (the lowest possible amount without triggering mortgage insurance) + IO loan. I will then put some money in the offset account (enough to a stage that the rental income = interest expenses). hopefully the equity continue to accumulate and receive some decent tax benefit from the fixture depreciation. I mean ultimately, I am betting on the CG in the future. PS. I'd transfer my income to my wife's account as she is in a lower tax bracket.
how does this plan sound?
and on the tax side, my parents wont be paying a market rent as they will not have an income in Australia. If that is the case, any recommendation on the tax side of things?
Thanks again and much appreciated.
Dom
If this is going to be an investment then I would suggest you borrow 105% even if you have the cash. You can structure this so as to save more tax.
You might also consider charging your parents market rent – even if you have to gift to them money to help them pay their rent.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Hi Terry,
Yes this is going to be an investment and would you mind what you mean by "You can structure this so as to save more tax." how should I structure the investment in order to save more tax?
Cheers,
Dom
Do you currently own property? What is the equity that you have in your current property?
Regards
Shahin
TheFinanceShop | Elite Property Finance
http://www.elitepropertyfinance.com
Email Me | Phone MeResidential and Commercial Brokerage
yes I do currently own a property, equity is 100%.
Cheers,
Dom
dongbell wrote:Hi Terry,Yes this is going to be an investment and would you mind what you mean by "You can structure this so as to save more tax." how should I structure the investment in order to save more tax?
Cheers,
Dom
Dom,
there are many potential ways to structure something like this.
1. Use other proeprty as securty
2. Use other property to set up a LOC
3. Gift and borrow back strategy with a trust
4. Spouse lending you money
5. cash depositWith 3 and 4 you could effectively increase tax deductions while diverting income to the spouse. 3 can offer significant asset protection advantages too.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
That is a lot of equity but I think you mean 80%. Is the property unencumbered?
Actually the answer to that question is irrelevant. The point is you have equity. You need to ensure that the structure of the loans are correct and you set up the loans standalone (i.e don't cross securitise).
Regards
Shahin
TheFinanceShop | Elite Property Finance
http://www.elitepropertyfinance.com
Email Me | Phone MeResidential and Commercial Brokerage
Terry: Thanks very much. I wouldn't mind to know more info regarding to 4. Spouse lending you money. Would be great if you can point me to some sources of informations.
Shahin: Sorry, what I mean by "100% equity" is that I have fully pay-off the property. (fully owned). Could you explain further as I dont really understand "You need to ensure that the structure of the loans are correct and you set up the loans standalone (i.e don't cross securitise)."? Many thanks in advance.
Dom
Dongbell, you would have to speak to your legal advisor about something like this.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Here is an example of what I mean:
Existing Property:
Loan A/C 1 – $x (Purpose is the 20% Deposit for the IP purchase – this will be tax deductible as the purpose of the funds are for the purchase of the IP)
New IP Property:
Loan A/C 2 – $x (Purpose is 80% of the IP purchase – this too will be tax deductible as the purpose of the funds are for the purchase of the IP)
You will need to submit 2 separate applications to ensure that the bank doesn't link the properties and in turn have more control of your properties than they need to.
Regards
Shahin
TheFinanceShop | Elite Property Finance
http://www.elitepropertyfinance.com
Email Me | Phone MeResidential and Commercial Brokerage
With loan account 1 above – you should also incorporate the purchase costs of the IP such as stamp duty which will take it closer to 25% of the properties value.
Cheers
Jamie
Jamie Moore | Pass Go Home Loans Pty Ltd
http://www.passgo.com.au
Email Me | Phone MeMortgage Broker assisting clients Australia wide Email: [email protected]
Hi Dom,
I think you need to look at your situation from a broader point of view – you have equity in your own home and I assume as any reasonable person want to maximise your future wealth via investing in property as well as via minimising the tax that you are currently paying.
The correct way of structuring this purchase really depends on your overall objectives, let me explain why:
One way to purchase investment property would be to borrow 80% from the bank and then pull out the remaining 20-25% from your own home, this way all of your expenses will be 100% tax deductible. However, buying one property is not really going to make you wealthy so if you are planning on purchasing multiple properties then you may want to structure your deal a bit differently – borrow 95% from the bank, pay LMI and pull the rest from your own home. This way you will get around 90k at a cost of around 12% p/a so you need to have a way to invest the extra cash at the return higher than 12% p/a.
Renting the townhouse to your parents in the future at anything but market rate is not a good idea because ATO has specific provisions around it and will consider your expenses non tax deductible.
Regarding your question on whether to purchase property in your own name, jointly with your wife or in the trust the answer really depends on your particular circumstances. For example is your wife going to be working continuously for the next 5-10 years or is she planning to take a break for a few years? Purchasing property in trust is a smart way to minimise tax, especially if you have parents who don't work. However the problem here is that $600k townhouse is likely to generate losses for many many years to come and standard discretionary trust does not allow distribution of losses. You can set up what is called a hybrid trust which initially will distribute losses to yourself and then at a later date convert to discretionary trust so you can distribute gains to your wife and parents, however I am not a specialist in this area and ATO has previously raised a number of issues with poorly structured hybrid trusts.
I hope you can see from the above that nobody on this forum can give you a definite answer as there is so much to consider, on the other hand this is not a rocket science so any good accountant should be able to give you a more definite advice (I wish it was that simple).
You need to run a discounted cashflow analysis for different purchase scenarios and look at the NPV for each of them, this way you will be well equipped when evaluating the best scenario with your accountant.
I would suggest that in the analysis you consider the following details:
– Expected rental yield
– Are you going to manage it yourself or get agency to manage
– Are you going to purchase a run down property and renovate to add sweat equity
– Capital growth expectations
– Holding horizon 5 years, 10 years or forever
And finally, have you considered purchasing a few cheaper investment properties instead of more expensive ones? For example you can buy two properties for 250-300k each and get around $700 p/w in rent meaning that these properties will be cashflow positive from day one. If you think that more expensive properties located close to the CBD appreciate more in value then as an option you can sell your home and buy more expensive one thus increasing your exposure to the property market and saving on the future CGT.
Regards,
EW
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. If you don't have an account, you can register here.