It is a not merely a matter of getting it over the line because of the lack of credit scoring.
You need to establish the reasons why the deal has been declined i.e short employment / residency history, existing liabilities etc etc and then look at the positive attributes.
i would be looking at the mortgage insurer behind the lender who declined the deal and trying to use someone who uses an alternative insurer or who has DUA.
At 95% going to be a lot harder but not impossible, lot easier at 90%.
Cheers
Yours in Finance
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
I would be more incline to try AMP and take advantage of their upfront valuation first- as you mentioned the valuation has failed twice already with 2 another lenders??
Yep, the rate goes up and the deal goes to Genworth.
If they can't keep it under 90%, then AMP is a no go because LMI probably won't be comfortable with the number of credit hits.
This is so important with AMP. Make sure you write it into your notes to reiterate that LVR is to not go beyond 90%!
Some of the sub 90% deals will still end up with Genworth if they're a little unusual – but for the most part, they should fall under AMP's DUA. You'll also need to provide some decent notes around the busy credit file.
Totally agree with Jamie but reading the initial comment i hate to say i don't think the submissions have been accomapanied by comprehensive notes detailing the merits of the submission.
Cheers
Yours in Finance
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. If you don't have an account, you can register here.