All Topics / Help Needed! / Living off Equity concept

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 21 total)
  • Profile photo of PropertySeekerPropertySeeker
    Participant
    @propertyseeker
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 43

    Hi everyone,

    I've been currently reading about this concept and sort of understand how it works. i.e. using property growth to constantly replenish the LOC. However if I were to execute this strategy, my LOC debt would grow and grow. How would I be able to reduce the debt?

    any ideas would be appreciated.

    Thanks
    PropertySeeker

    Profile photo of Jamie MooreJamie Moore
    Participant
    @jamie-m
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 5,069

    Hi property seeker

    It's a dangerous strategy and given the new credit legislation it shouldn't be possible as you need to identify what the LOC will be used for and "living off equity" ain't going to cut it.

    You're assumption is correct. Your debt will continue to rise. Therefore, you're relying on your portfolio to continually grow in value. What happens when the market stagnates for a few years or goes backwards?

    Cheers

    Jamie

    Jamie Moore | Pass Go Home Loans Pty Ltd
    http://www.passgo.com.au
    Email Me | Phone Me

    Mortgage Broker assisting clients Australia wide Email: [email protected]

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Living on equity means borrowing or living on borrowings. Borrowings will obviously increase. Any increased interest won't be deductible either.

    What if you lived on rents instead and capitalised loans? interest would probably be deductible if set up correctly

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of PropertySeekerPropertySeeker
    Participant
    @propertyseeker
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 43

    Hi all,

    thanks for the response. Terryw what do u mean by capitalised loans?

    I've been investing in properties for about 6 years now and not exactly sure how i can use these to retire. I could continue to buy more however it seems I would just have to continue to work to service them and never stop…..

    Thanks
    PropertySeeker

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    I mean, set up  the appropriate loans, and not make any payments.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of EPI_DenEPI_Den
    Member
    @epi_den
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 71

    Ultimately this concept involves living off borrowings and hoping that your capital growth will exceed your living expenses (and by a fair bit). A tax implication of this is that your living expenses aren’t tax-deductible so you slowly turn your investment (i.e. tax-deductible) loans into non-tax-deductible loans. Not necessarily a wise move. It’s an extremely risky strategy!

    Capitalising interest involves paying the interest on your investment loans from the investment loans themselves. This strategy may mean you have to increase your investment loan limits (sometimes they end up greater in value than the property they secure). The advantage of doing this is that you can pay off your home loan faster. My experience is that you need to get a tax ruling to capitalise interest, and your primary reason given needs to be that you’re paying off your home loan faster. If you say you want to capitalise interest so that you can reduce your tax debt, it’ll be a miracle for the ATO to rule in your favour!

    I hope this helps.

    And good luck with your investing!

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213
    EPI_Den wrote:
    My experience is that you need to get a tax ruling to capitalise interest, and your primary reason given needs to be that you're paying off your home loan faster. If you say you want to capitalise interest so that you can reduce your tax debt, it'll be a miracle for the ATO to rule in your favour! I hope this helps. And good luck with your investing!

    If you said the primary reason to capitalise interest was to pay off the home loan sooner then the ATO will likely deny the interest claimed. See the recent draft
    TD 2011/D8
    Income tax: does a taxpayer's purpose of 'paying their home loan off sooner' mean that Part IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 cannot apply to an 'investment loan interest payment arrangement' of the type described in this Taxation Determination?

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Sorry, and the answer to that question:

    1. No. A taxpayer's purpose of 'paying their home loan off sooner' does not mean that Part IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936)1 cannot apply to an 'investment loan interest payment arrangement' of the type described in paragraph 3 of this draft Determination.

    see http://law.ato.gov.au/atolaw/view.htm?docid=%22DXT%2FTD2011D8%2FNAT%2FATO%2F00001%22

    I should point out that I don't support living off equity in most circumstances, especially in these days of low growth. But doing it properly it can work – for a while at least. And rather than living off equity living off rents or dividends and letting loans capitalise may be a better way to proceed, especially if you have no other income and no outstanding private debt.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of DerekDerek
    Member
    @derek
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 3,544

    LOE needs property value increases and favourable lending conditions. If one of these is not present the whole concept falls in a heap.

    Neither of which are present in Australia at the moment (and may never return for a true LOE approach).

    The ultimate LOE approach is a reverse mortgage and speaking withssome from Police & Nurses today it would appear as if reverse mortgages are now severely constrained by NCCP, lending policies and credit availability.

    I might add LOE is not suitable in any way shape or form if you cannot manage a credit card. A 'big bucket LOC used in the LOE approach can be dangerous. '

    Profile photo of mattstamattsta
    Participant
    @mattsta
    Join Date: 2011
    Post Count: 604

    it seems that many of the previous posters really dislike the LOE apprach.

    I wonder though if anyone in this forum, or anyone you know, actually lives via the LOE approach successfully?
    It may be an exceptional case, but it would be interesting to hear of it to see whether it actually is possible.

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    I knew some people who did – had to sell their properties in the end.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of DerekDerek
    Member
    @derek
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 3,544
    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213
    Derek wrote:
    Ditto

    No, his name was Richard.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of DerekDerek
    Member
    @derek
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 3,544

    You dag!

    Ooops – that comment is probably showing my age :)

    Profile photo of PropertySeekerPropertySeeker
    Participant
    @propertyseeker
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 43

    Hi everyone,

    so it seems that LOE is off the table. I currently have 5 IPs with a bit of equity, what would people in this situation do now? what is their technique to retire? Selling seems abit wasteful and CGT isnt attractive. My goal is to retire

    Thanks
    PropertySeeker

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    You could look at borrowing some equity and investing into high yielding shares. Mst be careful tho. You could then possibly capitalise the interest on the LOC for hte shares and get some good dividends.

    give us some rough numbers?

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of DerekDerek
    Member
    @derek
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 3,544

    I recently participated in an online debate discussing this very issue.

    If your properties are paying their own way and you have some alternative income sources you can hang onto your properties pending a sale at the relevant time.

    A staged sell down is a reasonable option – if you have owned the properties for more than 12 months and you sell down in a low/no income year your exposure to CGT can be extremely low.

    Without knowing your exact situation it is hard to be more definitive – be careful of using LOC to fund shortfall. IN a flat market all you are doing is that you are erdoing your asset base.

    Profile photo of PropertySeekerPropertySeeker
    Participant
    @propertyseeker
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 43

    Hi all,

    thanks for the responses. A rough number would be about 400k LOC. Only 2 IPs have positive cashflow the other 3 are still negative.

    I was hoping that I wouldnt have to enter the stock market as it seems too volatile and risky. Perhaps manage funds would be better suited for me hmmmmm

    Thanks
    PropertySeeker

    Profile photo of DerekDerek
    Member
    @derek
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 3,544

    Hi Property Seeker,

    Numbers?

    What is your net cashflow position. What is the toal value of your properties?

    Profile photo of SamAus74SamAus74
    Member
    @samaus74
    Join Date: 2012
    Post Count: 19

    Property Seeker, what was the outcome on your question? I am not in your position but hope to be in. 5 -7 years.. Then what happens? As in how can one retire if the CG has not happened yet and some properties are still negative… Just wondering before I get there.. Wondering what you have decided….

    Sam.,

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 21 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. If you don't have an account, you can register here.