* picked up 1st IP 4 months ago (massive thanks to this site for giving me the confidence to take the leap! ) * Reno'd & refinanced * Have since picked up another 2 x IP's in the last couple of weeks * I'm 35 and like many on here wishing i had started earlier!!
I was stoked with end result especially for my first time/reno. Results from the reno amazed many people and I received lots and lots of positive feedback (not to mention from the Broker who wants me to oversee reno's for his properties).
From this I've had a few people want to get onboard and give me cash to help them get going. One in particular has a lot of cash to put into a partnership to start their portfolio.
Can anyone suggest a structure that would work for both of us taking into account:
* Buy, reno & hold strategy * Investor has $$$$ * I have the contacts to source good priced property, & know-how to make things happen. I'll be working on the property and sourcing labour/materials etc * after the Reno we can refinance and return some cash.
Ideally we want to end up with a 50/50 ownership in the property & returns.
Thanks in advance:)
Happy to post pix of the reno if anyone was interested.
There are very many ways to structure the arrangement you've outlined and our way of doing it may not suit your circumstances. But here's how we'd probably structure it: 1. Buy the property(s) in a unit trust, after making sure that the expert finance brokers on the Finance sub-forum can get finance for this entity. 2. Organise for our partner's family trust to own 50% of the units and our family trust to own the other 50% (with both family trusts having a corporate trustee). 3. Make sure we get a property specialist solicitor to draw up a JV agreement to spell out very clearly what is expected of both parties.
I'm sure there will be various ideas offered. Chose the one that suits your circumstances best but keep in mind asset protection, taxes and the requirement to have a strong JV agreement in place. Expect challenges and understand that a strong and detailed JV agreement will help you through these rough times.
Thanks for your info. I understand how that structure would work. The other important point to raise which I forgot to make clear in initial post is that the investor would be looking to pay for the entire process… ie 100% cash for property and 100% cash for renos (it should be noted investor is not in the mafia.. these are lower priced houses). I understand this is not the best investing strategy, but he wants to avoid financing.
So I guess in this situation we're trying to work out what percentage share our services are worth in the deal. Ie if we source the property, facilitate the reno and ideally increase the equity then what is this worth in terms of % share in the home? Do we charge a management fee for the process and take a 20 or 30% share? or less? And cashflow (rent) is returned to the investor as theirs no mortgage to be paid?
Of course a property specialist solictor would need to put together an agreement covering us all.
Thanks for your info. I understand how that structure would work. The other important point to raise which I forgot to make clear in initial post is that the investor would be looking to pay for the entire process… ie 100% cash for property and 100% cash for renos (it should be noted investor is not in the mafia.. these are lower priced houses). I understand this is not the best investing strategy, but he wants to avoid financing.
So I guess in this situation we're trying to work out what percentage share our services are worth in the deal. Ie if we source the property, facilitate the reno and ideally increase the equity then what is this worth in terms of % share in the home? Do we charge a management fee for the process and take a 20 or 30% share? or less? And cashflow (rent) is returned to the investor as theirs no mortgage to be paid?
Of course a property specialist solictor would need to put together an agreement covering us all.
cheers,
Harry
I would have suggested what Paul suggested, but with him putting up cash that will change things. Maybe just give him a larger percentage by giving more % of units in the unit trust.
Are you going to mortgage these properties to get loans later?
I agree with Terry, i.e. work out a percentage split that you're both happy with and adjust the percentage unit ownership. It's really a matter of your negotiating skills and your ability to sell the value of what you're bringing to the JV.
However, as you do more transactions together, your experience will increase and you may look back and wish the unit split was 50/50. One way around this is to leave the unit ownership at 50/50 and adjust the profit share for each project through the JV agreement. This means you have a JV agreement for each property (a good idea anyway) and profit share and all other variables within the JV can be adjusted as projects vary and expectations invariably change.
I've re-assessed the situation and after more research on JV's, I think I like the idea of the Buy/Reno/Sell strategy. We then sell and split profits. Obviously CGT is not an ideal situation but I guess its our or my task to make sure the whole project is worth our while taking this into account.
My basic breakdown for the JV would be:
* Investor to fund purchase & renovation of properties * Me to source the property and project manage the renovations * We sell and split the profits 70/30 ( my way… ha ha.. just joking I wish)
Do you think this could work? I'm happy with this.
Just wondering how we would go about formalising this? Obviously we need a JV set up but a Property Specialist Solicitor, but do we need to set up a Unit trust? I assume they will know the other variables that would need to be taken into account ?
The way I see it is the partner has money but no experience and wants to get into the market and I have experience (albeit not a huge amount), so I see it that we can help each other out. Again I guess the issue which I raised earlier is what price does ones experience equate to?
You mention a unit trust. Is this because it would protect both of our assets should things go wrong?
Surely there must be a way for this to work for both parties? It does seem like it would be hard to implement but surely its possible?
in an education program i'm participating in, they like to keep things simple and say that time input and money input shoudl be considered equal, and therefore if 1 person is putting in 100% of the time and the other 100% of the money then profits split 50:50. This is regardless of level of experience… You could however work a budget into your agreement and decide costs prior to commencing, and if you go over costs then forfeit some part of your profit, and possibly also if you manage to come in well under budget that could go back into your pocket.
holding onto the properties at the end could pose problems as you may have different decisions about what you want done with them, whether to hold, sell etc etc. What happens if there's an unexpected illness/separation/family crisis or job loss and someone wants to sell in a hurry but the investor doesn't and is not in a positionof buying them out? One way around this is your cash investor could pay for a valuation at settlement, then you come in and do all the reno work (funded by him) then get a valuation on completion and you take a share of the increase in value, allowing him to retain the property in his portfolio. Or alternatively you could request a % fee for managing the project, however you may be more motivated with a decent 50% share of the profits.
Before going to speak to a solicitor to get it all drawn up, have a good long look at your own goals and their goals, and decide – do you want to hold half a property in your portfolio, or do you want to make some quick cash out of the deal which can go into other investments held in your own name?
The way I see it is the partner has money but no experience and wants to get into the market and I have experience (albeit not a huge amount), so I see it that we can help each other out. Again I guess the issue which I raised earlier is what price does ones experience equate to?
You mention a unit trust. Is this because it would protect both of our assets should things go wrong?
Surely there must be a way for this to work for both parties? It does seem like it would be hard to implement but surely its possible?
With a unit trust this clearly separates percentage ownership. So you could have 60 units and him 40 etc. You can also do with your units as you please – such as have them held by your discretionary trust. You could transfer some later to other people without having to change the title deeds on the property etc.
One advantage in addition is that often one partner will want to get out of the deal after a whle for various reasons. This is much easier to do with a company owning the property as trustee for the unit trust. The one getting out just sells their units to the remaining person or to another person.
I agree with the other posts 1.find out your goals 2 set a strategy e.g buy and hold, renovate and sell or some combination 3 find a good accountant, they are worth their weight in gold 4 find a tax/property solicitor to draw up a unit trust with corporate trustees – you can use it to income stream and is tax effective for capital gains tax -it can employ you -it is expensive to set up but it can save you a lot of money and heartache in the longer term make each property a separate JV agreement. this allows more flexibility to alter your income/profit division. – you can borrow and use the money to invest it in the unit trust as equity on the units 5 do not use a partnership 6 do all of this before you start investing. it is difficult and expensive to change any corporate structures later esp stamp duty payments if you change ownership arrangements
good luck-
Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. If you don't have an account, you can register here.