All Topics / Help Needed! / Investment loan structure

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 29 total)
  • Profile photo of PaulliePaullie
    Member
    @paullie
    Join Date: 2009
    Post Count: 217

    Hi everyone, its been a while since Ive posted, and I need some sound advice.

    Yesterday I had an offer accepted for a property for $352,500. Tenant to stay in at $320 per week.

    My PPOR is paid off in full and is worth about $1,500,000.

    I have no other debt to my name. Wife is a stay at home mum, I am in full time employment and pay lots of tax (>$50,000pa).

    How should I structure the mortgage account to maximise any tax benefits, flexibility etc.

    From what I have read an interest only loan with an offset account is the way to go as it enables me to have funds on tap for my next purchase etc.

    Thanks in advance for your advice.

    Profile photo of Richard TaylorRichard Taylor
    Participant
    @qlds007
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 12,024

    Personally i would split the loans.

    80% secured against the IP with 1 lender where you could look at a fixed or variable rate and 20% plus costs secured your PPOR with another lender with 100% offset account.

    As the value of the IP increases shift the debt onto the IP and start again with another property.

    Couple of little bits you could do with regards to possibly prepaying interest but all in all it depends largely on the property itself.

    I am assuming you that the property is still negatively geared and you are buying it in your name ?

    Cheers

    Yours in Finance

    Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender

    Profile photo of PaulliePaullie
    Member
    @paullie
    Join Date: 2009
    Post Count: 217

    Property will be negatively geared until of course I pay enough principal. Purchasing the property in joint name, my wife and I.

    Profile photo of Richard TaylorRichard Taylor
    Participant
    @qlds007
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 12,024

    Well i wouldnt be buying as Joint Tenants if you intend to pay down the principal. 

    This needs a little more structuring. Have you considered a Discretionary Trust structure?

    Would aid the Tax problem but will benefit you in the end.

    Your mortgage broker should be able to give you some pointers in regards to the structure but i would be looking at something like if you were a client of mine.

    Offset on the IP even and LOC on your place to cover a couple of deposits plus a DFT.

    Cheers

    Yours in Finance

     

    Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender

    Profile photo of PaulliePaullie
    Member
    @paullie
    Join Date: 2009
    Post Count: 217

    I will be seeing my accountant early next week.

    Do I nee to use my PPoR as security for this purchase? Or can I simply pay the mortgage insurance and use the IP as security?

    Profile photo of Richard TaylorRichard Taylor
    Participant
    @qlds007
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 12,024

    No you cant get 100% lvr so unless you use some cash then you will need to gear against the PPOR.

    I just wouldnt cross collateralise the 2 securities and hence would split between 2 lenders.

    Dont forget you need to have the Trust set up before you enter into the Contract.

    Cheers

    Yours in Finance

    Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender

    Profile photo of PaulliePaullie
    Member
    @paullie
    Join Date: 2009
    Post Count: 217

    Ive got some funds I can use, so I don't necessarily need 100% IVR.

    So the trust needs to be setup before the settlement contract or the mortgage contract?

    Profile photo of Nina_10Nina_10
    Member
    @nina_10
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 6

    So the trust needs to be setup before the settlement contract or the mortgage contract?.
    and why can it be not done after the contracts are signed?.
    I am interested in knowing this too please.

    Profile photo of Richard TaylorRichard Taylor
    Participant
    @qlds007
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 12,024

    Personally i wouldnt use your own funds i would put them in the offset account for flexibility.

    Yes the Trust Deed needs to be dated prior to the Contract being signed.

    Cheers

    Yours in Finance

    Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Since you have no other debt, i would suggest you seriously look at using a discretionary trust.

    Depending on your situation you could gift or loan the trust the 20% deposit to get started. You should then keep gifting (probably) money from wages etc into the trust. The property will become positively geared quickly and this income can be distirbuted to your wife. You then just keep repeating the process, probably adding another trust every 2nd property.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of PaulliePaullie
    Member
    @paullie
    Join Date: 2009
    Post Count: 217

    OK, we are looking at the CBA offering – wealth package plus MISA account for offset.

    Now, the question is PI or IO.

    The way interest only was explained to me is that the interest is calculated at the beginning of the loan, and regardless of offset will remain the same. To me thats just madness, or wrong.

    Example:

    I take out an IO loan for $100,000 @ 5% interest. The interest is $417 a month.
    Now if I have a MISA account linked to this IO account with $50,000, I still have to pay $417 a month.

    That is how it was explained to me, if this is true, IO is no good for me because like many, I want to reduce the interest I'm paying. Remember I have no non deductible debt, so this debt is the next best thing to pay off.

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    why bother with CBA?

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of PaulliePaullie
    Member
    @paullie
    Join Date: 2009
    Post Count: 217

    We compared 6 lenders, although CBA came out second out of six in terms of total loan repayments I chose CBA.

    I currently hold accounts there and the wealth package now eliminated fees on those accounts.

    I read that Bank West are despicable in terms of settling, and I have a 45 day settlement.

    Any other suggestions? Also, to my question regarding IO loans …

    Profile photo of Richard TaylorRichard Taylor
    Participant
    @qlds007
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 12,024

    Did CBA tell you that their MISA account is not a fully transactional offset account.

    Remember not all lenders calculate their offset accounts the same especially on interest only loans (The Dragon is another with a few funny quirks for investors) so probably whey your figures dont vary.

    I cant see too much benefit in their Wealth Package.

    Hate to disagree but i find Bank West good to deal with and have never missed one of my Settlements.

    Course the are not a lover of Trust / Pty Ltd structures but in saying that which major bank is.

    There are many other options especially when you are structuring the loan correctly.

    Course from Friday you need to add on the extra 45 bps.

    Cheers

    Yours in Finance

    Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender

    Profile photo of PaulliePaullie
    Member
    @paullie
    Join Date: 2009
    Post Count: 217

    I realize the MISA is not fully functional, I don't need it to be as I won't be using it for day to day transactions.

    So you've said there no benefit to their wealth package, whats a good alternative?

    Profile photo of Richard TaylorRichard Taylor
    Participant
    @qlds007
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 12,024

    What are you getting for your annual $350 and why would you Not want an every day transactional offset account on part of the loan.

    You can't set up a decent portolio by crossing all of your loans and the easiest way to avoid this is use different lenders.

    One lender to fund the deposits and acqusition costs on your PPOR (which you would normally link to an offset) and then a separate lender to fund the IP loan.

    Each IP loan could certainly be with the same lender.

    I spend so many hours a day restructuring clients loans especially CBA clients where the Bank have tucked up the client and then told them not a lot more they can do. (Had 2 deals in to for high net worth clients who were completely cross collateralised and now the CBA have told them they cant lend them any more money despite with 6 properties only being at a 55% lvr).

    Just ask the CBA Bank manager how many properties he has and that will give you an idea of how successful he has been.

    Cheers

    Yours in Finance 

    Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender

    Profile photo of PaulliePaullie
    Member
    @paullie
    Join Date: 2009
    Post Count: 217

    I think I need to explain.

    Firstly I currently hold the title to my PPoR which is values at 1.5 mil.

    The loan for the IP will be $372,500 to cover all expenses as well.

    I do not want the bank to hold two titles and they were going to slug me LMI if I used the IP only as security (>95% LMI).

    So, I opted to use my PPoR as security, thus reducing the LVR so I don't have to be slugged LMI. In return I will receive the title for the IP.

    When I pay down enough of the load below 80% LVR or so, I can swap the titles over is I choose to.

    So you see, there is only one loan, with one title held as security, linked to one MISA account.

    Make sense? Is this right?

    Profile photo of Richard TaylorRichard Taylor
    Participant
    @qlds007
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 12,024

    Sorry mate i couldnt disagree with you more.

    My personal portfolio is worth over $18.5M with a a total loan of less than $2.4M.

    I would never offer my PPOR (which is actually in the wifes name anyway) as security for another property.

    Why wouldnt you take an 80% lend on the IP as mentioned earlier with a 100% offset A/c and if necessary an LOC on your place to fund the 20% plus costs.

    Why do you want to expose your PPOR to more debt than necessary.

    I am sure CBA have told you it is the way to go and sure if you decide they are right go that route but i can tell you i would never do that. If you buy in Trust you are going to have to gift or loan the funds to your DFT why again would you have your PPOR as security. Sorry but it is beyond me.

    To conclude i still fail to see why even if you wanted to give the security of your PPOR why you would take the Wealth Package and pay $350 / annum.

    Cheers

    Yours in Finance

    Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender

    Profile photo of PaulliePaullie
    Member
    @paullie
    Join Date: 2009
    Post Count: 217

    Richard, I'm not experienced in this, I went with what made sense at the time. Neither my accountant or the MB suggested what you are saying.

    So please, so I understand what your saying.

    1. Take a loan for 80% of the funds from one institution for $282,000 with offset account.
    2. Take a line of credit on my PPoR from another institution for $70,500 + costs.

    Can you please explain how this model will work better for me? Like I said, I have no experience in this. What are the advantages etc.

    Thanks Richard

    Profile photo of Richard TaylorRichard Taylor
    Participant
    @qlds007
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 12,024

    I am not being funny if your MB has not suggested this he is not acting in your best interest or has no idea how to structure an investment loan.maybe he hasnt ever purchased an IP either.

    Yes you have the concept of the suggested structure.

    All you would do as the Ip increases in value is redraw upto 80% of the increased valuation and then pay down the LOC.

    Eventually the entire debt would be on the IP although the LOC could be used for the next property purchase.

    For most clients we structure it that the LOC is sufficient for say 2 x 20% deposit plus costs just saves going back again and again to increase the LOC amount.

    Cheers

    Yours in Finance

    Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 29 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. If you don't have an account, you can register here.