All Topics / General Property / which one is better?

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Profile photo of cyfmikecyfmike
    Member
    @cyfmike
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 10

    Can any one tell me which one is better? It is difficult for me to choose indeed.

    (1)
    Type :House
    price: 355K
    Bedroom: 3 (I would say 2 and a half)
    Location: 1.5km from station (quite, neighbor house are in good conditions, well maintain)
    Toilet: 1 and a half
    Land size: 580sqm
    Age: over 20 years
    Condition: good to excellent
    FHB grant: 14000
    Garage: 1
    improvement list: replace 1 sinker and top, miner water leakage from the pergola,   (expecting 5000)
    Yard: Excellent, well maintained.
    Others: Good size and comfortable pergola with fly screen, flat contour

    (2)
    Type: Duplex
    price: 370K
    Bedroom: 4 (all double size)
    Location: less than 1km from station (near semi main road)
    Toilet: 2 plus 1 en suite
    Land size: 300sqm
    Age: Brand new (7 years structural + plumbing guarantee)
    Condition: Good to excellent
    FHB grant: 21000
    Garage: 1.5
    Small Pergola
    Yard: small, low maintenance
    improvement list: all light fitting, security system, wardrobe partitions (expecting 5000 as well)

    Profile photo of Scott No MatesScott No Mates
    Participant
    @scott-no-mates
    Join Date: 2005
    Post Count: 3,856

    Consider $ rent, proximity to services/station. 3 bed + study is probably more practical however you do share a common wall with a neighbour. Neither will affect resale value (other than losing greater depreciation on the new property).

    Profile photo of cyfmikecyfmike
    Member
    @cyfmike
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 10

    I think both are good to living in. But (2) can be a better investment item after a few years.

    Profile photo of hbbehrendorffhbbehrendorff
    Member
    @hbbehrendorff
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 293
    Profile photo of PosEnterprisesPosEnterprises
    Member
    @posenterprises
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 290

    I would go for 1 land size is bigger. the land appreciates and the house depreciates

    Profile photo of cyfmikecyfmike
    Member
    @cyfmike
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 10

    I reckon that I will have more competitors on (2) while I am the only potential buyer on (1).
    Price at 355K is a below average price for (1) . A poorer condition property sold at 356K recently in the negibourhood according to the agent and I believe it so.
    while 370K is an above average for (2), similar older (1 to 5 years old) properties with 3bedrooms are at most ASKING at 320K only.
    I cannot agree more that land price will absolutely go up.
    But I reckon more people are willing to rent (2) and make it a better investment item.
    I am willing to pay 350K for (2) but I forsee it is not going to happen.
    BUt I feel that I can get (1) at 352K.(Vendor should be in a rush to sell)

    Profile photo of Scott No MatesScott No Mates
    Participant
    @scott-no-mates
    Join Date: 2005
    Post Count: 3,856

    If you are keen on 2, hit them with a lowball offer say $330-340, offer decent settlement (must be something in it for the vendor to settle quickly), submit a signed contract with a deposit and submit your letter noting that it is open to acceptance for ?? days.

    Profile photo of cyfmikecyfmike
    Member
    @cyfmike
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 10

    wow, what can be "something" for the vendor to settle quick?

    Profile photo of Scott No MatesScott No Mates
    Participant
    @scott-no-mates
    Join Date: 2005
    Post Count: 3,856

    Time is money (a quick settlement means less interest charges for the developer)

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. If you don't have an account, you can register here.