All Topics / Finance / short-term lender

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Profile photo of oom123oom123
    Member
    @oom123
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 2

    I’m considering to invest with a finance company”oakland investment” They are specialised in lending money to short-term borrower.It will return 12.5% Company said it is secured by the properties. so,it’s quite safe. Hwr,I’m not quite sure about the company and how safe is it to invest with them. I’m new to this kind of investment.Any suggestions or comments would be appreciated

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    quite safe?

    Not necessarily. These sorts of companies lend to people who have problems getting normal finance. It may be secured by property, but things can go wrong and there are shortfalls sometimes.

    Does this company have a prospectus?

    Terryw
    Discover Home Loans
    Parramatta
    [email protected]
    Sign up to my mailing list.
    Just send me a blank email, with “subscribe” in subject line.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of oom123oom123
    Member
    @oom123
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 2

    Yes, they do. They describe as first-class preference share. It’s said the company follows ASIC rules.

    Profile photo of Mortgage HunterMortgage Hunter
    Participant
    @mortgage-hunter
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 3,781

    Risk and return are inversely related.

    Ask yourself why this company needs to pay 12.5% to raise funds.

    ING Direct only needs to pay 6% to raise millions and millions.

    Just because a company follows ASIC requirements (and every company is supposed to so it is not that special) doesn’t mean the company cannot shut shop on you. You will then be in a queue to receieve a % of your funds back from what the auditors can find left.

    I personally wouldn’t touch it. I am in managed funds which earn more and are secured by the underlying stocks. So they can also enjoy CG. But that is my preference.

    My last IP returns 9%pa plus it went up about 30% in the three years I owned it.

    Your 12% is just yield – there is no upside for capital growth.

    All the best

    Simon Macks
    Residential and Commercial Finance Broker
    [email protected]
    0425 228 985

    Comments may not be relevant to individual circumstances. If you intend making any investment, financial or taxation decision you should consult a professional adviser.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. If you don't have an account, you can register here.