All Topics / Legal & Accounting / accountant talking us out of trust
Has this site really gotten that bad?
Stupid comments and advertising everywhere!
What a poorly constructed site with very little value for true property investors.
Got to go now and ask a few people if they have seen any cash flow positive properties and then perhaps go to NZ and look for Steve and then follow him to the US. May take me sometime as it is hard to do with my eyes closed and my ears covered chanting “+CF rules, I know everything, expect where they are, +CF rulesâ€
Bye
Wow advertising in my post complaining about advertising!
That sucks big time!
I also could not believe some of these comments. People like Dale GG and Michael Yardney are offering an alternative to thinking inside a box.
Like Dale said, not all situations apply to all people, it’s about time we stoped taking advice as gospel and start taking some RESPONSIBILITY for our actions.
If Dales advice does not suit your specific circumstances, just don’t use it!!! But please develop enough inteligence to work out whether it does or not without just blatantly blaming others for your own stupidity!!!
My appologies for the harshness, just can’t deal with victim mentalities, it makes me mad!
Dale, keep up the GREAT work mate, some of us don’t want to live inside a chicken coop!
Xenia Ioannou-Mena
Property Manager
Cash Flow Solution specialist
E: [email protected]
M. 0412 437 582Perhaps our friend should be grateful that I do not believe in suing people…..but, I can tell you that comments like the ones posted on this forum did have my legal friends salivating at the chance to flex their muscles…
http://www.caslon.com.au/defamationprofile.htm
what is defamation?
Defamation essentially takes two forms – libel (often characterised as involving a statement in a ‘permanent form’, such as a print or online publication or an electronic broadcast) and slander (typically an oral statement that is not published).
As discussed later in this profile, the definition of defamation and defences vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. However, defamation broadly involves a statement that tends to diminish an individual’s reputation in the estimation of others. That diminution may be restricted to the person’s honour or may extend to the individual’s capacity to earn a living or fully participate in society.
In many jurisdictions the author’s intention is not of primary concern: it is enough that a defamatory statement was made and received by an audience. That audience might be an individual’s professional peers, residents of a small community or people across a nation.
Typically defamation law allows an individual to claim some redress for a statement that is found to be defamatory.
That redress might be restricted to an apology by those responsible for the statement, with a publisher for example printing a retraction acknowledging that the statement was incorrect. It might extend to the payment of damages that provide recompense for suffering/loss and that signal society’s condemnation of the statement, with such exemplary damages acting as a deterrent against republication of the statement or similar publication.
An Education in Income Tax Law
Point 1
Not all accountants, or tax practitioners, read and understand tax law the same way. That is why, for example, we see so many issues in tax law go to court for the judges to decide on what is right and what is wrong.
It is also interesting to note that it is not uncommon for court decisions on tax related matters to be split 3 in favour and 2 against…or vice versa.
So, if our legal system and the smartest and wisest people in the country cannot be absolutely certain how the tax law should be read, interpreted and applied, then….how can a simple accountant hope to be 100% right, all the time?
Clearly, they cannot.
All they can do is seek opinions from more learned people than themselves and study the law and the court decisions that apply to the law.
Point 2
If you ask an accountant…can I claim this, or that? The answer has to be a yes, or a no.
Accountants are taught and trained to be conservative and so they will often say no as a way of protecting their client.
However, if you ask an accountant “how can I claim this, or that?
Then you are assuming it can be done and the accountant will open his or her mind to find a way for that particular item to be claimed.
This is one of the most important tools an investor can develop.
Point 3
From the ATO Ruling Mt 2042
8. On the other hand, relatively inexpensive Christmas gifts of food or drink that will be consumed by the employees at home (such as a bottle of whiskey or wine or a hamper of food) are not regarded as being the provision of entertainment for the purposes of subsection 51AE(4). Expenditure incurred on such gifts will be treated as an allowable deduction in calculating the taxable income of the employer.
Point 4
INCOME TAX ASSESSMENT ACT 1997
CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION AND CORE PROVISIONS
PART 1-3 – CORE PROVISIONS
Division 8 – Deductions
TABLE OF SECTIONS
8-1 General deductions
8-5 Specific deductions
8-10 No double deductionsSECTION 8-1 General deductions
8-1(1) You can deduct from your assessable income any loss or outgoing to the extent that:
(a) it is incurred in gaining or producing your assessable income; or
(b) it is necessarily incurred in carrying on a *business for the purpose of gaining or producing your assessable income.
[
Note:
Division 35 prevents losses from non-commercial business activities that may contribute to a tax loss being offset against other assessable income.]
History
S 8-1(1) amended by No 90 of 2000, s 3 and Sch 1 item 1, by inserting the Note at the end, applicable to assessments for the 2000/01 and later income years.8-1(2) However, you cannot deduct a loss or outgoing under this section to the extent that:
(a) it is a loss or outgoing of capital, or of a capital nature; or
(b) it is a loss or outgoing of a private or domestic nature; or
(c) it is incurred in relation to gaining or producing your *exempt income or your *non-assessable non-exempt income; or
(d) a provision of this Act prevents you from deducting it.
For a summary list of provisions about deductions, see section 12-5.
History
S 8-1(2) amended by No 66 of 2003, s 3 and Sch 3 item 57, by inserting “or your *non-assessable non-exempt income” for “*exempt income” in para (c), applicable to assessments for the 2003-04 income years and later income years.8-1(3) A loss or outgoing that you can deduct under this section is called a general deduction.
For the effect of the GST in working out deductions, see Division 27.
[
Note:
If you receive an amount as insurance, indemnity or other recoupment of a loss or outgoing that you can deduct under this section, the amount may be included in your assessable income: see Subdivision 20-A. ]
History
S 8-1(3) amended by No 41 of 2005, s 3 and Sch 2 items 2 and 3, by substituting “Note” for “Note 1” in Note 1 and repealing Note 2, applicable to assessments for the first income year starting on or after 1 July 2005 and later income years. Note 2 formerly read:
“Note 2: A cash accounting regime applies for general deductions, and some other deductions, incurred by STS taxpayers: see Division 328. “
S 8-1(3) amended by No 78 of 2001, s 3 and Sch 2 items 3 and 4, by renaming the note as “Note 1” and inserting Note 2, applicable to assessments for the first income year starting after 30 June 2001, and for later income years.
S 8-1(3) amended by No 176 of 1999, s 3 and Sch 3 item 2, by inserting the reference to Division 27 at the end, effective 1 July 2000.
S 8-1(3) amended by No 16 of 1998.Disclaimer and notice of copyright applicable to materials provided by CCH Australia Limited
CCH Australia Limited (“CCH”) believes that all information which it has provided in this site is accurate and reliable, but gives no warranty of accuracy or reliability of such information to the reader or any third party. The information provided by CCH is not legal or professional advice. To the extent permitted by law, no responsibility for damages or loss arising in any way out of or in connection with or incidental to any errors or ommissions in any information provided is accepted by CCH or by persons involved in the preparation and provision of the information, whether arising from negligence or otherwise, from the use of or results obtained from information supplied by CCH.
The information provided by CCH includes history notes and other value-added features which are subject to CCH copyright. No CCH material may be copied, reproduced, republished, uploaded, posted, transmitted, or distributed in any way, except that you may download one copy for your personal use only, provided you keep intact all copyright and other proprietary notices. In particular, the reproduction of any part of the information for sale or incorporation in any product intended for sale is prohibited without CCH’s prior consent.© Commonwealth of Australia
This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved.
Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Attorney General’s Department, Robert Garran Offices, National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600 or posted at http://www.ag.gov.au/ccaHi Dale,
I do not believe the great majority of people subscribe to the what ‘Dale said is wrong’ camp in any way shape or form.
Your depth of knowledge is recognised by many and if you search here you will also see that there have been a great many posts recommending Dale GG as an accountant of the higest regard, irrespective of where the question originator lives.
As you indicated in your more recent comments – not all accountants read tax law the same way. I might add the same statement can be extended to many a profession.
In closing congrats – and sleep peacefully those that recognise a ‘good accountant’ when they ‘see’ one recognise your expertise.
Cheers
Derek
[email protected]
http://www.pis.theinvestorsclub.com.au
0409 882 958
Skype – derekjones2113Time for me to do as many have done before and keep my knowledge to the Somersoft crew. Once someone starts attacking people in the profession I say goodbye. Good luck.
It’s a shame that the comments of a few can hurt a forum so much, with some knowledgable posters not returning.
You will be missed Coasty.[glum2]
I think people should be trying to be positive and not so abusive in their posts. This forum is all about helping each other.
This disapoints me.[angry2]
CATA
Asset Protection Specialist
[email protected]To be honest I think the moderators should have stepped in, most have a wealth of knowledge and experience..
I can only agree that nowdays I seem to be spending less and less time on this forum..nice for a visit but..
“Money is a currency, like electricity and it requires momentum to make it Effective”
Online Positive Cashflow and Renovating CalculatorsHello,
I have not read Dales book as we are on a tight budget, but some of the advice he has given is worth its weight in gold,I can not believe that one accountant could attack another in a public forum.
Or some one would call their MP for tax advice!!!Keep up the good work Dale.
Cheers,
PeterHi Lisa
I admire your passion and your desire to protect people. Both qualities are admirable and sadly, all too rare….especially in accountants.
I have many accountants approach me with a view to picking my brain as to what I think and why I think it….and, as a result of my admiration for your qualities, I am extend an invitation to you or your partners to do the same.
Free of charge, of course.
Dale
G’Day Dale
Can’t believe the rubbish being posted on this forum.
As a client, I know first hand of the time, effort and absolute integrity that you have given to us for business and personal tax/accounting matters. Apart from genuine respect, courtesy and interest.
I guess that one could rant and rave but why drag oneself down to their level or subject the valued contributors to a pointless diatribe?
We’re doing fine with you (and all the team in your office) and will happily provide a public or private reference to anybody who needs to know it!
Talk to you soon
John
I’m Stunned. That’s all I have to say. The loss of CoastyMike is a true loss to this forum. I have read many of his posts in awe at his simple manner of explanation and truly aspire to write like him. Unfortunately I am unable to yet, but with practice…
Lisa, if you don’t wish for your copy of Dale’s book to be wasted I’ll buy it off you for $20.00.
That goes for everyone else on the forum who has decided it is rubbish. I know a couple of people to whom it would make an ideal present. I also love books (even the boring ones) and would hate to see it wasted or binned etc;
Dale, I haven’t read your book. I have heard many both on here and not speak highly of it and yourself. If Cata thinks you’re alright then that’s enough for me. He might be costing me my new motorcycle (which I don’t really need anyway) to set up my trust structures, but I’m sure when I’m claiming my sex toys (does that include german dvd’s too?) back from the ATO I’ll be more than happy with the expense incurred!
I am completely disenchanted with the posts on here. I must admit. I thought this was somewhere for EVERYONE to come and SHARE their KNOWLEDGE with others, and for EVERYONE to LEARN from OTHERS. For goodness sake what has the world come to? All we need now is a bomb and some terror and we will be no better off than those in an oppressed society.
If I offend some of you then GREAT!
Perhaps you need it.
Hey you don’t like the book don’t read the damned thing! If you don’t agree with someone’s opinion then DON’T READ IT! or simply say “I disagree because of ________(insert fact here)”
Anyone would think it is rocket science.
I have to go now before I really really go off.
The offer stands: if you don’t want your copy of the book I’ll pay $20 for it.
Stuart Milne
Non-Conforming Specialist
READY Mortgages
http://www.readymortgages.com.au
[email protected]
Mob: 0404 056 055Yes any one else who is disappionted in the book I will buy it for $20 as well.
Just send a PM,
Thanks Dale.
Cheers,
PeterHi,
I find it funny that people who jump to Dale’s defense here openly defame me on another forum site. Good old tall poppy syndrome.
Anyway, without any agenda, I have met, heard and chatted with Dale on several occasions. While I would regard some of his tax claims for personal expenses aggressive, he creates a reasonably arguable position. Ultimately, such claims are made under the Australian self-assessment tax system and so they will be honoured, until such time as they are tested (which may be never), in which case it is up to the lawyers to fight it out.
Like most advice (my own included) it’s up to you to take it or leave it.
Now, as for Dale as a person – never, not once, has his integrity been called into question with my dealings with him. This is a rare situation in the world of wealth creation, and speaks volumes for his professionalism and approach.
Regards,
Steve McKnight
**********
Remember that success comes from doing things differently.
**********Steve McKnight | PropertyInvesting.com Pty Ltd | CEO
https://www.propertyinvesting.comSuccess comes from doing things differently
Hi all,
I have recently started dealing with Dale and have found him, his firm and advice to be fantastic. A few months ago I was really struggling to find someone who was prepared to give good advice for the property investment market. Dale has solved my problem.
Cheers,
JV
JV
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. If you don't have an account, you can register here.