who’s your mentor

this is driving me crazy, it’s all too confusing!!!!

We buy properties in Adelaide. Immediate Cash Settlements, No Agent Fees.
[email protected]
phone 0412 437 582

If there was a list u would be on the bottom GR … u r the most uninspiring and confusing poster i have read … but hey in your mind things must be wonderful [upsidedown]

Thanks a lot GR. I just wasted 5+ mins of my life that I cant get back trying to understand your posts. Are you trying to be mysterious or do you really write like that?

Gross,

Looks like to some members you are their mentor, their TorMentor. [argue]

Mal

Getting out of your comfort zone, can help you become comfortable

So shwing (ha ha ha ha)[blink]how much money will u invest in his projects as a business partner, like nothing!!??

resi

GR … Resiwealth Pty Ltd and .com will never be involved with u or one of your projects if in fact you have any.

The strategy of the group and its members is embarking on a new path within the realestate and development industry, that is more laterial than main stream projects.

The returns on developers projects today and 4 the next few years will be very challenging to give returns back to their investors. We need to b smarter now if we want to make money in this area. The henry kaye days are gone and the EXPERIENCED developers who have gone through the last 15 years will IMHO will survive to a greater degree.

There is today too much knowledge down loaded from web sites with little hands-on experience. Before i invest money in a project i ask for;

directors guarantees
1st mortgage security/not second
bank guarantees
caveats over the directors PPOR
list of past projects
independant solicators guarantee
KPMG report and analaysis

And much more … resiwealth

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Dear Grossrealisation and Resiwealth,

1. I think we all have our own different approach to doing business and serving our clientele depending on our own marketing/targetted niche.

2. While Resiwealth’s a/m requirement is reflective of the many requirements normally required by an average investor, it is by no means the only way to do business.

3. Personally, I did not like this approach nor enjoy the spirit of JV co-operation/collabration under such a approach at all. This is becuase it does not provide us with the correct basis to build a long term business trust relationship between 2 willing parties concerned.

4. By requiring all these “legal” safeguards in the business contract, implicitly spekaing, the underlying spirit is one, where there seems to be “no/minimal” trust between the JV partners and both p[arties operating on the basis competing and conflicting personal interests at hand. How then can/do we expect to succeed together in this kind of working thier “relationship”, when at the outset, we are suggesting and openly telling vendors/JV partners-investors in writing that we do not actually trust ourselves/our own “people-judgement” capability and “them” intrinsically as a person, saved for the legal contract to be signed first. In short, we prefer to trust the paper contract per se, rather than the real personhood behind the 2 parties involved in this the contractual relationship.

5. Not only that, the official thinking and underlying spirit behind this type of business relationship is that both the vendor and investors are “intrinsically selfish” people out to pursue their own interests even at the expense at the other party concerned. It is further assumed that the vednor is merely trying to “sell” something, to the investors and profit himself, at the latter’s expense. Thus,legal safeguards are deemed neccessary pre-conditions for the contract to work, thereby endorsing that both the vendors and investors are actually allowed to have conflicting interests and hidden agenda at each other’s expense.

6. If there is such a doubt in the investors’mind in the first place, in my mind, I rather that my JV partners-investors clear them first by doing their own required due diligence, and by willing to trust themselves first by getting to know me and my recommended products better first before they actually put any monies with me;- instead of choosing to “conveniently ignored” their own existing inner self-doubts regarding my personal integrity and honour as a person intriniscally as well as about himself as a intrinsic person too.

7. A business relationship which is based on contractual safeguards, actually denigrates our human existence and values and actually go against the original spirit and intentions of 2 willing parties to come together to learn to trust one another and with a common joint interests to successfully co-operate/collaborate together for the collective good. It will profit none except for the affected lawyers concerned.

8. Thus, personally, I still beleive that prefer the Oriental way of doing business based on mutual respect and an ongoing personal knowledge and basic trust relationship between the vendor and the investors before we proceed to extend that personal relationship into the “business” context by learning to co-operate and to work successfully together with one another for the joint enterprises collective good.

8. For your kind update and further comments and discssion, please.

9. Thank you.

regards,
Kenneth KOH

Gross

This to confuseing,
This is not about a mentor its about sending people mental

Monopoly, my favourite game