All Topics / Help Needed! / Property yield

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Profile photo of darrin_mdarrin_m
    Member
    @darrin_m
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 2

    Just read Steve’s book and one of Kiyosakis and just about ready for the first +CF property purchase. One thing I would like to know is where does the 10.4% yield come from. I know the calculation, but why 10.4%. Sorry if this question sounds a bit dumb….[blink]

    Profile photo of YorkerYorker
    Member
    @yorker
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 306

    Search the forum. The answer lies deep with in the core of this forum.

    Profile photo of muppetmuppet
    Member
    @muppet
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 900

    Hi Darrin

    You take the rent multiply by 52 and divide by the cost of the house. This gives you the gross yield.
    What you are aiming for is a gross yield of 10.4%
    eg 150*52/75000=10.4% gross yield.

    Also masquerades as the 11 sec rule. Take the rent, divide by 2, multiply by 1000 and that is what you should pay for the house to give you a gross yield of 10.4%.
    eg 150 divided by 2, multiplied by 1000 = $75000

    Anyway someone may come up with a better explanation.

    Also refer to Steve’s book “From 0 to 130 properties in 3.5 Years” p/30-34 where he explains when to use it.

    Regards

    Profile photo of westanwestan
    Member
    @westan
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,950

    Hi Darrin

    are you asking why 10.4%, if so, its steve’s idea of when a deal starts to look atractive, personally and i’m sure steve agrees, i like a bit better than 10.4%, but in today market thats about as good as it gets it appears. (or is it ?)

    regards westan

    I live in New Zealand and for a fee find cash positive deals there, email me at [email protected] to join our database

    Profile photo of darrin_mdarrin_m
    Member
    @darrin_m
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 2

    Westan

    That’s exactly what I was after, why 10.4. I gather the maths was done to get this percentage which then makes the return a bit more attactive.

    Profile photo of kay henrykay henry
    Member
    @kay-henry
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,737

    Darrin, I think it’s just a figure to make sure a property covers expenses. If one is paying interest rates of about 6.5%, then to get 10.4% ought cover all expenses.

    For me, it’s an easy way to work with numbers. Muppet gave you the technical way. I just take the property price and then double it for rental yield. So a 50k house should get 100 bucks a week rent; a 75k house = 150 rent; a 100k house = 200 rent etc. The way I do it is not technically correct, but it’s close, and it’s easy on my brain.

    10.4 = 104 weeks really… 52 weeks in a year, so double that for yield.

    kay henry

    Profile photo of IbuycashflowIbuycashflow
    Participant
    @ibuycashflow
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 274

    Hi Darrin,

    This rule is a “rule of thumb” to help you filter the properties you look at and determine what is worth a second look.

    As interest rates rise the rule becomes less effective but it is a quick formula to use and a lot quicker than 11 seconds. There is no magic in the rate of 10.4%

    If your property passes this test you still have to do your homework to see if it is a good buy.

    Cheers
    Jeff

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. If you don't have an account, you can register here.