All Topics / General Property / BUYING…SIGHT UNSEEN

Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 17 total)
  • Profile photo of RussHRussH
    Member
    @russh
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 342

    Hi guys and gals.
    I have just returned from a trip to Geraldton where I was checking out a few leads for some clients.My RE friend showed me an area where some eastern states investors had bought some 54 properties sight unseen through some very unsrupulous RE agents.
    I,ve seen some iffy streets before but this whole area was unbelievable.
    I have also said that everyone has to live somewhere and therefore there will always be a demand for rentals in all sorts of areas but I now have very different thoughts regarding this statement.
    Some of the houses looked great and they would have presented well n a photo.However what you dont see in a photo is the ten or so neighbouring properties.To say that it looked like a war zone would be a total understatement.
    Buyer Beware!!!
    If you know of any investors who have bought in the Rangeway Utakarra or Karloo areas of Geraldton,please tell them to keep up there insurance premiums because they may need urgent medical attention if they ever decide to inspect their investments.
    Russ.

    So many +CF properties in Western Australia.Let me help you. And we can achieve a win win situation.Russ.0438 659 411

    Profile photo of DerekDerek
    Member
    @derek
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 3,544

    Hi Russ,

    Maybe those investors needed to make two extra phone calls – local police and city offices.

    An independent second opinion would have been useful – it gets back to the old adage the cheapest properties are usually in the worst part of town.

    Derek
    [email protected]

    Read my comments? Think I can help you? PM or email me.

    Profile photo of yackyack
    Member
    @yack
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 1,206

    I cannot believe people buy properties sight unseen and purely based on the numbers….

    Good Luck.

    Profile photo of kay henrykay henry
    Member
    @kay-henry
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,737

    Well, the thing is, people need to do RESEARCH! Blind Freddy would know that those areas are dodgy. A few internet checks, a bit of asking around on somersoft or on here… or doing a search on these forums… and you’d KNOW the problems. Any checking I do includes crime checks, checks for social problems, unemployment rates etc etc. I would quite happily buy a property in double bay, sydney, for example, without seeing it- sheesh, it dpends on where you’re buying into.

    Russ, you were on here before saying eastern staters know nothing about WA. But many of us have done LOTS of checking on areas around geraldton. That’s why we don’t buy there :o) Info about social problems doesn’t surprise me. But I don’t have to go there to know that. If you go to the search engine on here, there are probably 20 or more references to those areas, and why reinvent the wheel? If property investors say those areas suck, then it’s good enough for me.

    kay henry

    Profile photo of RussHRussH
    Member
    @russh
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 342

    Hi Kay Henry.
    These areas were extreme cases. There are still some good deals in Gero.I just feel sorry for all those who have bought sight unseen in these particular areas.
    Russ.

    So many +CF properties in Western Australia.Let me help you. And we can achieve a win win situation.Russ.0438 659 411

    Profile photo of BEAR1964BEAR1964
    Participant
    @bear1964
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 702

    There is an agent i use that refuses to sell site unseen with some properties. He dont want them coming back to him 6 months later demanding a tenant.

    Regards Bear

    POSITVE CASHFLOW properties and Joint Ventures available!
    For the BEST deals register via E-mail [email protected]
    DONT MISS OUT!!!!!

    Profile photo of RugbyfanRugbyfan
    Member
    @rugbyfan
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 683

    I have an agent I use too that rings me about deals but always wants me to go and have a look at them before I offer.

    ‘Eat rich food, barbeque a yuppie’ [greedy]

    Profile photo of Matt BMatt B
    Member
    @matt-b
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 22

    I have no qualms about buying a property without actually visiting it first, but I think you need an increased level of other types of due diligence. I’d certainly want plenty of pictures and the advice of several people with expert knowledge (particular that of someone I can trust). Assuming you can trust them, building inspectors (for example) would have a much more valuable opinion of the property than I would anyway and, so far, I’ve found them to be quite reliable. Of course, a trustworthy spotter can be very valuable too.

    Matt

    Profile photo of CastleDreamerCastleDreamer
    Participant
    @castledreamer
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 288

    Absolutely, sight unseen from an agent is very different to sight unseen from a trusted spotter. But some people will prefer to see every property and that’s entirely sensible as well. We each have our own risk levels.
    CD

    CastleDreamer

    Profile photo of CeliviaCelivia
    Participant
    @celivia
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 886

    I’m reading the new Margaret Lomas book at the moment and she actually recommends to buy a property sight unseen!
    SHe even advices you should not even see photo’s of the property!!
    She says that it is enough to do a lot of research (like Kay mentioned) and go from there. This way you won’t get emotionally involved.

    I dunno…
    Not sure if I ever would or wouldn’t. I am a bit reluctant, but on the other hand, I am certainly getting sick and tired of going from a to b and all the other letters of the alphabet without results.
    It’s very tempting to use a good spotter. We are just thinking about it at the moment and have to discuss it some more.

    Profile photo of MiniMogulMiniMogul
    Participant
    @minimogul
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,414

    yack,

    > I cannot believe people buy properties sight unseen and purely based on the
    > numbers….

    OK, when you say sight unseen, let’s say you have pictures, because you usually do get those when a property is marketed. and let’s say the pictures look OK, but you haven’t actually inspected in person. And you make your phone calls about the area, the street, the rental market, etc etc.

    It’s not so much that you BUY sight unseen, – you just make OFFERS sight unseen but SUBJECT TO (typig in capitals as it’s a very important difference!!!) satisfactory inspection or building inspections. It’s just a form of time leverage, especially if you don’t live around the corner from properties you are looking at.

    However i would stress that the bird-dog properties for clients we have photographed and inspected them ourselves.

    > There is an agent i use that refuses to sell site unseen with some properties.
    > He dont want them coming back to him 6 months later demanding a tenant.
    >
    *grin* woulda thought the agent would be happy to have another chance to sell the property, for commission of course…

    Seriously, this is just stupid. I mean I am sure that there are people who would buy sight unseen and not do any due diligence, as there would be people who buy without a builder’s report and think they don’t need one because they ‘had a good look themselves’. I’m neither of those two types!!

    Getting a tenant vs. sitting vacant for 6 months is purely demand compared to condition of your house for the price compared to what else is on the market. That’s all. It is possible to check all that stuff out with your BR and phone calls without actually going there.

    > I have no qualms about buying a property without actually visiting it first,
    > but I think you need an increased level of other types of due diligence.

    exactly!!!!

    >I’d
    > certainly want plenty of pictures

    yep

    >and the advice of several people with expert
    > knowledge (particular that of someone I can trust).

    yep!!!

    >Assuming you can trust
    > them, building inspectors (for example) would have a much more valuable
    > opinion of the property than I would anyway

    SOOOOO couldn’t agree more!!!

    > and, so far, I’ve found them to be
    > quite reliable.

    Yep!!

    > I’m reading the new Margaret Lomas book at the moment and she actually
    > recommends to buy a property sight unseen!
    > SHe even advices you should not even see photo’s of the property!!
    > She says that it is enough to do a lot of research (like Kay mentioned) and go
    > from there. This way you won’t get emotionally involved.

    i agree with this too

    Profile photo of kay henrykay henry
    Member
    @kay-henry
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,737

    No pictures of the property Cel??? No way! Pictures let me know if I can love it or not! And if there’s no love, there’s no purchase [inlove]

    I did actually buy an IP without a pic, but I saw some pics a month later of another one in the same condition, so I had something to hold onto. [blush2] I think buying an IP (we ARE spending a lot of $$$ after all, even on cheapy CF+ ones) is a bit like agreeing to marry someone without knowing what they look like. I wanna know my IP is attractive, otherwise how can I sleep with it? hehe.

    Pics rock. Having said that… virtual tours add about 10sq metres to the visuals of a property. The place, when one sees it, can appear positively anorexic compared to the cam shots.

    kay henry

    Profile photo of MiniMogulMiniMogul
    Participant
    @minimogul
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,414

    oops kay, in my post above, I didn’t mean to agree to ‘no pics’. I’m with you, you need pictures for sure.

    Profile photo of peterppeterp
    Member
    @peterp
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 307

    So many points arise:

    1. My experience:

    I spent 2wks there in Sept 2003 where I picked up a 2br b/t duplex in Bluff Pt (already with tenant). The price and rental would be similar to a house in Rangeway/Spalding. All the PMs and my own reserch revealed that Bluff Pt was a popular area and had low vacancies. And 7 min walk from the beach couldn’t be a bad thing! Feedback from locals on Spalding and Rangeway was damning, though there were some OK pockets there.

    Before I went I knew about Rangeway & Spalding. My initial thoughs were Beachlands & Beresford, but Beachlands is mainly older houses and Bereford had many flats/units. Though a little further away from the CBD Bluff Point is mainly houses (mostly owner occ), has cap growth potential and the right property came up at the right price.

    2. Rangeway.

    I haven’t seen Karloo or Utakarra but I went on a walking tour through Rangeway. I walked along Rifle Range Rd, then to the shops and behind there.

    Rifle Range Rd was asbestos houses. Brought back childhood memories for me. Maybe they’d offend some garden-watering city dweller types. Yes the places could have done with some work, but not quite a war zone.

    There were some nice looking streets behind the shops (eg Tuart St). The brick/tile houses reminded me of parts of Safety Bay, though the gardents weren’t as consistently good. Not bad, though I didn’t go there at night to listen for any yelling or screaming as I had already bought elsewhere.

    Rangeway Shops – unattractive, but I have seen worse. The security screens were most offputting. Can’t remember how much graffiti and vandalism was there, but I reckon the Bluff Point Shops (which everyone says is a nice area) aren’t that much better and need work (apart from the lack of security screens).

    Russ – which parts of Rangeway did you look at?

    Now if you really want to find some real grotholes, try touring the asbestos hovels of Kalgoorlie Boulder!

    3. Merits of various towns.

    Kay is right that a small amount of research would unearth the problem areas of Geraldton. But before dismissing all of Geraldton as a ‘bad investment’. I’d go one step further and isolate the problem a bit more rather than giving the whole city a miss. There are some good areas of Geraldton that I think will make excellent investments. Other people seem to think so and there’s hundreds of millions of dollars being poured into the town. Failing to ascertain the extent of could mean missing out on opportunities because of what happens in a few suburbs.

    3. Buying sight unseen. I like her books, but I think Margaret Lomas is dead wrong on this.

    Maybe some women are susceptible to being driven by emotional things (eg colours of the bathroom tiles) but I have sufficient faith in myself not to be swayed by trivia.

    Russ is 100% right that the quality of neighbouring properties is important. If you subscribe to the ‘worst house best street’ theory, a Rangeway-style house in Bluff Point, Tarcoola or Beachlands might have been be a better buy.

    An informed spotter can help, but there are always things that you think of later. Eg:

    a. Just saying that there’s a corner shop there is no good if it closed down last week or is only open 2 days a week. b. Similarly a post in the ground saying ‘bus stop’ is not much use if there’s only two buses a day.
    c. How many old cars are there in frontyards?
    d. Are streetlights broken?
    e. If living in the area would you let your kids walk barefoot to the local deli (risk of glass on pavement)?
    f. What do local shopkeepers think of area?
    g. Length of grass in lawns (to spot rental properties)
    h. How much mesh and bars over shop windows?
    i. Are street signs bent?
    j. Empty shops in area?
    k. Are curtins actually sheets in windows?
    l. Timber over smashed windows in houses?
    m. Sit outside shops and watch type of people entering
    n. Is playground equip in parks vandalised?
    o. Stray dogs?
    p. Range of magazines in local deli
    q. Houses look cared for?

    Basically you need to get down and dirty, talk to the locals, walk the streets at night, get the timetables, inspect the shops, etc. Do far more than an agent (or even a spotter) would do.

    Also by visiting you can see the potential for a property much more than from photos. Eg, is the space at the side big enough to fit a car through? If so it could form a driveway for a second house at the rear.

    Regards, Peter

    Profile photo of RussHRussH
    Member
    @russh
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 342

    Peter.thanks for your words.Gero is a good place to invest.There are some good areas of growth.However as I pointed out there are some very bad areas and even worse pockets in these areas.And a few very nice houses in there too.But from a buyer purchasing sight unseen in these areas one would have to have a lot of faith in the Lord.
    Russ.

    So many +CF properties in Western Australia.Let me help you. And we can achieve a win win situation.Russ.0438 659 411

    Profile photo of kay henrykay henry
    Member
    @kay-henry
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,737

    Peterp,

    That’s a really good post- thankyou :o)

    In a geographical area such as Geraldton, there will be good and less good areas in which to buy. I think one is buying into trouble if one buys asbestos- you’re right! And some of the better areas have been raked over by investors by now. One strategy I have is not to buy in areas that are HUGELY known by investors- ie Ipswich, Gero, etc. I figure what hasn’t been bought up so far, might not have been bought up for a reason :)

    The relative geographic isolation also bothers me a bit.

    Russ- best of luck with what you’re doing. You’ve obvoiusly got a real passion for it! [thumbsupanim]

    kay henry

    Profile photo of peterppeterp
    Member
    @peterp
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 307
    Originally posted by kay henry:

    Peterp,

    That’s a really good post- thankyou :o)

    Thanks Kay :)

    >In a geographical area such as Geraldton, there >will be good and less good areas in which to >buy.

    My experience was the opposite. When I arrived there in Sept 03 the recent buying activity was cheap houses in the cheapest suburbs – eastern states investors buying 20 or more in one go.

    My place there (better suburb, better quality but probably $20k more than cheap asbestos houses) had been on the market for >2mths.

    So it was clear that at that time people were only going for $50k houses.

    Lately the better properties in better areas have moved up in value and are selling quicker.

    In this case the gain started with the worse properties and worked towards the better places, whereas other booms spurts start with better (or inner) houses and work out through the suburbs into the country.

    Geraldton is a low wage/low rent town and would never have been my first choice if you were just interested in yield. I only chose the city because it provided diversification from my investment in higher yield areas and there were some growth prospects.

    Peter

Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 17 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. If you don't have an account, you can register here.