All Topics / General Property / What is bad with Cross Collateralisation

Viewing 9 posts - 21 through 29 (of 29 total)
  • Profile photo of comdomcomdom
    Participant
    @comdom
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 92

    Terryw,

    How do you calculate LVR?
    Thanks Dom [;)]

    Profile photo of AdministratorAdministrator
    Keymaster
    @piadmin
    Join Date: 2013
    Post Count: 3,225

    I don’t understand what is so complicated about the subject.

    The less securities one commits to a lender for a particular loan the more ability you retain to
    raise further moneys if required.

    Pisces133

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Steven

    I still can’t get what you are saying and your link provides no clues either. I agree that Trusts are an excellent tool and hold all of my properties in a trust structure. I know that trusts help save tax and so help serviceability in that regard, but I do not beleive having a trust increases your borrowing power because of the guarrantees required.

    Are you of a different opinion?

    Terryw
    Discover Home Loans
    North Sydney
    [email protected]

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of MobileMortgage3MobileMortgage3
    Member
    @mobilemortgage3
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 21

    Hi Terryw,
    I apologize for the delay in responding to your question; I have had computer problems.

    Terry I never said using a trust would increase borrowing power, I said it would increase serviceability due to the tax benefits that arise from having investments set up in a trust, a point you now agree with.

    Another point I would like to make is that, lending institutions will take 75% of the income from an investment property as acceptable income regardless of who the beneficiaries of the trust are.

    You also mentioned this below.

    “Steven
    I still can’t get what you are saying and your link provides no clues either. I agree that Trusts are an excellent tool and hold all of my properties in a trust structure. I know that trusts help save tax and so help serviceability in that regard, but I do not beleive having a trust increases your borrowing power because of the guarrantees required.
    Are you of a different opinion?
    Terryw”

    Terry if your properties are held in a trust structure and the trust owns the properties and you are the director of the trust, then you are the guarantor,
    So if guarantees are required, then you as director sign the guarantees for yourself.

    You say the links I provided did not provide any clues, did you phone or e-mail Dale?
    Please let me know how you get on.
    Kind Regards
    Steven.

    Mobile Mortgage
    [email protected]
    Phone 0402483216

    Profile photo of OzpatinQ8OzpatinQ8
    Member
    @ozpatinq8
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 40

    Hi all,

    Im with NAB and have an existing LOC with them up to $185K secured by 2 houses (paid first one off totally, applied for LOC and bought another). I have over 50K in equity with that LOC.

    I am currently buying my 3rd also through the NAB as we speak. I knew the NAB would take this 3rd property with a 70% LVR, as a friend is also buying one. The strange thing is that they wouldnt increase my LOC accordingly (with new property as security for increase), instead they want it to be a seperate P&I.Heres their best figures.

    quote:


    Variable Rate Home Loan Choice Package (no bank fees at all – no application fee and no ongoing account fees) this has a variable interest rate of 6.060% over 30 years


    But they still want to take my first 2 properties as security for the 3rd property purchase.? [?] ?

    I dont understand why the NAB would do this. I have more than enough equity available for a deposit instead of using my first properties as security. I have informed the bank that I would rather not do it this way and Im waiting on their reply.

    Can any of you offer any insight into their reasoning for this or a better way to go about it.? As they wont increase my existing LOC, I thought by using a sub account within my LOC with funds to cover my deposit, would be better than this cross collateralisation as you all have been discussing.

    1 other question I have for the brokers is why would a lender lower their LVR because an individual resides overseas ?

    Cheers

    J

    “Success comes from having the proper aim as well as the right ammunition”

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Steven

    i give up!

    Terryw
    Discover Home Loans
    North Sydney
    [email protected]

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of C2C2
    Participant
    @c2
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 518

    Hi OzpatinQ8,

    As an o/s investor myself I have found this is common amongst the lenders. I think it may have a little to do with how far they can check your income. Generally people who are working o/s normally finish their employment and move on so there is a higher risk for the bank as well(quote from lender at which bank). You may want to check with ANZ as I have heard that they will allow 95% for o/s investors. If your looking for a good broker I can refer you to one from this forum.

    C2
    Is it true the more you owe the more you grow until the bank steps in?”

    Profile photo of astral_manastral_man
    Participant
    @astral_man
    Join Date: 2007
    Post Count: 1

    re X colateralisation. I’m new to all this but….No one has mentioned the “All Monies Clause” that Banks employ. My understanding is that with a X C loan set up, the bank, under the all monies clause, can acess all and any of your assets to recliam thier loan. Not good. I also believe that they will only stretch finance about as far as the equity limit amount on you initial proerty. Al

    Profile photo of Richard TaylorRichard Taylor
    Participant
    @qlds007
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 12,024

    I am sure that Terry, Simon and I throw our hands up every single day of the week with stories like this.

    They are all as bad as each other so dont worry.

    Loan structuring is not rocket science but it is a unusual trade only practised by those with a degree of professionalism in the industry.

    Bankers do not have this vision as they are solely focussed on security and dam the client at all expense.

    There is always a better way of doing things so i would invite every member to think about contacting a specialist mortgage broker with a view to reviewing your portolfio.

    This is NOT a push for business but a genuine offer for forum member to feel free to allow one of us (and i assume Terry / Simon have no problems with this) to have a look at your structure and see whether it will cause you problems in the future.

    There is NO CHARGE WHATSOEVER for this advice.

    Cheers

    Richard Taylor
    Residential & Commercial Finance Broker.
    Licensed Financial Planner. Ph: 07 3720 1888
    [email protected]
    New 100% Shared Equity scheme coming soon – Email us for details.

    Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender

Viewing 9 posts - 21 through 29 (of 29 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. If you don't have an account, you can register here.