(1) Presently, we have our I.P. loans set up as P&I. as we want to reduce debt ASAP.
(2) Our repayments come out of our Mortgage Offset acc, and rent received goes into that Offset acc. Theoretically, it should increase in cashflow in time.
(3) We still have our own mortgage on PPOR.[]
Would we be better for our new I.P’s to make them I.O. and with the extra cashflow in, reducing our own Mortgage quicker, which isn’t tax deductible.
Help please, seems obvious to everyone else probably!!!!
In short – yes, always better to divert all free cash flow to reduce non-deductible debt first. If you have a home loan then I would definately only repay interest only on IP loans.
Ditto. I would definately pay off the PPOR first.Just be careful of possible fees converting from P&I to I/O on your investment loans. I had a question re P&I and I/O myself but my situation is different to yours.
Regards
Marty[]
Sometimes it’s easy to forget the BIG PICTURE !![]
We should repay our PPOR debt before our I.P’s.
I will leave our loans that we already have as P&I, but for the ones under contract, they’ll now be I.O. until our mortgage is paid. That will give us a good mix also.
This forum is great to reassure you of what you think is right.[:X]
Yes Steve, I should have read the newsletter first.[]
I agree. Definetly go IO on any future IP. And I would change teh existing ones to IO as well – as long as the fees in doing so are too much. And I hope your mortgage offset account is set up against the PPOR loan.
Fixed rates have dropped (probably) since you took out the loans. Therefore will have probably have to pay the bank a large penalty for getting out. May not be worth it. (I recently paid more than $3000 exit fee on one of my 5 year fixed loans).
It would hurt to ask your lender, if you could keep the loan in place and just change it to IO. they may do it with no change. Or you may even end up saving if you break the loan and then go for a lower rate.