All Topics / The Treasure Chest / Buying Subject to…
Hi
I was wondering if anyone in Australia is purhasing property sunbject to existing finance ?
Does anyone know if it is legal to do that in Australia ?
I would be interested to hear peoples views on the ethics of doing it !
Some people might say buying subject to existing fin means sucking out the equity someone has already got in a property ?
Let me know your thoughts on whether this is viable in Australia !!
Regards
BrettHey Stricker,
Could you explain more about what you mean by that clause. What is the aim ?Enjoy
AD [:0)]
(Andrew)“”Imagination is more important than knowledge. Knowledge is limited. Imagination encircles the world.”
Albert EinsteinIn Oz, a common clause is “subject to finance” meaning that the purchaser can pull out of the deal if s/he cannot obtain satifactory finance.
It’s usually put in as an exit clause as well.But i don’t think you’re referring to this particular clause?
What country are you from and can you do it there?
Are you referring to buying a property by ‘assuming’ the current loan?
Pete
Hi
Pete ! Yes that is what I meant.
Assuming the current loan.
Regards
BrettBrett
Ok as far as I am aware, although this is an extremely common practice in the USA its a lot harder to complete here.
My understanding is that Aussie Banks don’t have what they call fully assumable loans here, that is there a clause in the loan contract which states that the loan cannot be assumed by another person. so basically the only thing you can do is refinance the loan – possibly under a new persons name.
However, I heard a rumour a while ago that Westpac or National had a fully assumable loan in the pipe works. I think I heard this at a Vendor Finance Assoc. meeting or I may have dreamt it..
Either way its a great way to purchase property extremely easily and/or cheaply, particularly if the vendor is close to defaulting on their current loan..
Pete
The topic ‘Buying Subject to…’ is closed to new replies.