Forum Replies Created
Figures look correct – Again, just remember to take this $22k out as a seperate loan so that claiming the deductible interest will be much simpler at tax time!
I'm still contemplating getting a tax ruling on that one Terry.
I ran some numbers and it is a very powerful strategy as you pointed out in a previous post.
Have you ever seen someone called up on Part VIA or similar breach of the Taxation Act for it?
Thanks
*smirk* Nice one Terry.
Hi Emerald mum,
The only way that you can increase the deductible portion of the loan is if it is used for something that adds capital value to the property. As your friend suggested, renovation is a good example of this.
eg: Your current loan is $100,000 and you complete $20,000 of renovation – The new loan is $120,000 and this will be fully deductible.
Unfortunately any redraws for personal or domestic use will not be tax deductible.
In terms of who to see I would go to the accountant, then fin planner and then banker…
I think I just worked it out.
30c tax is on the ENTIRE profit, whereas individual tax rates are on a sliding scale.
Is this how you derived the $120k?
Thanks for the response Terry.
I thought next year's tax rates resulted in taxable income over $80k paying 38c in each $1 – Am I missing something here with the $120k you mention?
The S/P covers off on any other personal guarantees, but not any other directorships.
I suppose the only time this would be an issue is if you had funded through a company and not given a director's guarantee. Uncommon, but not unheard of.
S/P for reference – http://www.nab.com.au/wps/wcm/connect/1770e1804bc621c4931f932345045098/Cust_SP.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=1770e1804bc621c4931f932345045098
I agree Richard.
And in respect to finding a "lender" who doesn't ask those questions, you probably couldn't.
If you looked for specific individuals within those organisations who don't ask the right questions – they are everywhere!
In terms of standard application forms, I don't think ours have it written…? Most probably do though.
And once again, I DO NOT advocate lying or "hiding the truth" from your lender…. ever
Sorry to hijack your thread kashe, but this question may also help you with yours.
Terry – When you distribute from the trust to the company, the company pays only 30% tax rate, so this is great for people above 30 cents in the dollar marginal tax rate.
The question is…. then what? How can an individual distribute those funds for their own use without paying a marginal tax rate anyway ? (Even if the distribution is franked, the net effect is zero).
Now I can see that one benefit would be using the money in the company to continue investing in further assets, but at some point the end game is to take the money out to fund retirement right?
Unless distributing to a super fund or some other low tax vehicle, how can the individual eventually use the funds in the company having only paid 30% tax?
Thanks mate.
Richard,
Just clarifying regarding the up front valuation ordering.
If the deal goes ahead, then the client pays for the valuation right? And if it doesn't then the broker pays for it?
I think Homeside do that now too
fredo,
Some investors will borrow under different companies and specify different directorships with different banks.
If the bank asks you what companies you are associated with and all the loans you guarantee, then you have to advise them.
In some cases though, the bank will never ask, and therefore occasionally people get away with perhaps more finance than they would have if they had disclosed everything.
I should add, it is the responsibility of the banker to do the proper checks and ask the right questions but I think it is best to disclose everything to your financier up front in any case.
Nice brief explanation Terry – I'm saving this link for when the question comes up again.
No problems sprunk – Make sure you post back to let us know how it goes!
Good Luck!
aaabbbccc,
Have PM'd you. Let me know if you didnt get my details.
Definitely fair – In the same circumstance I would offer around $250k and see what sort of response you get.
Then go to $255k, and ultimately up to $260k if you have to.
And if it goes above your budget, let it go! There will always be another opportunity around the corner,and it gives you more time to save money.
Hi Michelle,
With the place in Cowra, did you get $170 p.w week rental BEFORE or AFTER renovation?
Hi Natasha,
It seems you already have the answer, but just confirming that NAB will not lend under a SMSF for construction either.
Hi CJ,
If you plan to buy another PPOR and turn the existing PPOR into an IP then I would stop making payments to it immediately.
Your best option is to make the Perth property loan interest only and make all your repayments into an offset accounts against that loan.
This has three advantages:
– You are still saving interest on the PPOR until you buy in Melbourne
– You are maximising the amount of cash available for the purchase in Melbourne
– By achieving the above point, you are also maximising the amount of deductible interest on the IP once is swaps over.With having the loan in your own name, are you referring to the IP or PPOR?
If the property is in joint names you can still have the loan in a single name, but the other personal who's name the property is in will have to give a guarantee.
Hope this helps.
was only kidding about the stalkers comment dwolfe… all good
If you have a PPOR home loan then put all the interest into an offset account against that loan, rather than the IP loan.
This way you get both the savings and the deductions…