Forum Replies Created
Its a tough one. I have not been through it yet but these are my thoughts.
1. If you sell before finding new PPOR. You may be limited in whats on the market and you may not find the PPOR that you really want in the time you have. Or you have the extra hassle of renting and moving twice. This too costs time and money.
2. If you buy new PPOR because its what you really want then the downside is that you may accept or get less for your old PPOR as you need the funds.
So whats worse – buy a new PPOR that really does not suit your needs OR get less money when you sell your old PPOR.
If you intend to stay in the PPOR for many many years then getting a little less for your old PPOR may be the lesser of two evils.
Thats probably what I will do when its time to upgrade my PPOR.
Anyway – just my thoughts.
Seems highly unlikely to me.
Based on your figures I dont know how she can afford to eat let alone pay 3 large mortgages.
She may be better of selling one of the investments and paying down the PPOR loan and trying to buy a second investment property.
I doubt very much she will get a loan for a third.
But ask the mortgage brokers – they should know more than me.
I pay my wife $750 per property. I work full time and she looks after the kids and properties. The investment properties are in my name.
The management fee is declared in her tax return. I get the deduction against my income and she pays no tax on it as its under the income tax threshhold.
I have a mate who pays his wife $1500 per property. I think thats a bit high, but his properties are interstate.
Just get a good local estate agent.
Serious Investors source properties. If an investor wants a property they go to the local agents, discuss their requirements with them and even leave their details.
I dont see why you need to advertise at all.
Thanks Wilandel
Thanks for your comments. One day I can see myself going to meet guys like you, richmond, henry kay and monopoly.
Thanks for your honesty Kay. Thats why I respect your posts very much.
I believe its fair enough that moderators and mappers etc are part of the team and get admitted to the seminar for free.
At least I know now whether some people are going because they paid the money or whether they are going because they were offered a free ticket as part of their role within propertyinvesting.com
So Leigh K – were you offered a free ticket or not? My understanding is that you have been to many of these seminars. I just cant really fathom why you keep paying for them. Especially when I consider you have been a moderator ever since I joined the forum.
My understanding is that any deprn claimed reduces the cost base when calculating the gain.
eg. Cost $200k
Deprn claimed during life of peoperty $10k
Selling price = $250k.Gain = $250k – ($200k-$10k) = $60k Gain.
Please correct me if I am wrong.
Leigh K said –
<<<<<<Must we always do this. fYi, I have parted with $495.00 paid via visa online. I do have a receipt will that be necessary?>>>
Well its important to me know who is going because they are part of the team or really parting with their money because they feel passionate about it. I can evaluate your posts in a different light now.
I dont need to see a receipt. Posting your reply here clarifies it for me and others if they are interested.
As Wilandel is a Mappers, then I can assume she is part of the team though.
I dont buy for depreciation purposes.
I actually prefer to buy older places. I feel it works out the same if not better to buy an older place. When you buy newer you pay more anyway and for a worse position.
As an example. Lets say you can buy either.
1. An older 2 bed unit in Mentone – 18 kms from city. OR
2. A new 2 bed townhouse in Edithvale/Chelsea – about 22kms from city.In 5 yrs time both they will look similiar and the older one is closer to the city and therefore in a better position.
Thats how i look at it. Location is better than short term deprn benefits.
I subscribe to the Australian property investors magazine. I also learn alot from here.
Leigh K, wilandel, minimogul, jetdollars
How many of you guys are parting with the $495?
It would be good for future participants to know who is part of the team and who are actually parting with the folding stuff.
We dont want everyone to think that some of you guys pay to attend this course when you may in fact be part of the team presenting or mingling.
Yeah the kids have nanna and grandpa to hassle tonight. I hope they sleep in alot later than normal tomorrow morning.
Mines all gone now
1. Sewing Machine $400
2. Two tickets to formal ball tonite $200
3. A great dress for my wife. $300. Boy does he look hot.
4. Bought a suit in the Myers Sales $300. Got it for half price. Take an extra 25% off the already discounted red ticket price. plus shareholder discount. You beauty. shareholder card finishes end of july.So there goes the $1200.
Hi
4 – 1 PPOR (almost outright), 3 1P (All neutral to positive now) Sold one a few weeks ago to capture some gains.
39 years old
8 years in property investing.Now raising two young kids (3 and 4 yr olds) with my wife. Only one income. I am conservative accountant.
No hurry for next investment. I will wait for a few more interest rate rises. We are off to Canada and the UK in Sept/Oct. Looking for a development site next.
Work is good – even time to look at this site regularly.
I agree with Baloo. We are at a point where interest rates are on the rise. As interest rates rise property prices fall as the cost of owning them goes up.
Read the following article in todays Age –
A potential interest rate rise will be back on the agenda when the Reserve Bank board meets next Tuesday after the release of figures showing a surge in job vacancies and credit growth.
The article can be found – http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/07/01/1088488095509.html
I am not sitting on my navel as you so put it – so please dont say that about others that dont share your view. I am looking after my existing portfolio.
I recall periods of years where property prices went no where. I believe we will have a period like that. I dont reckon there is a hurry to purchase now.
The US economy is expecting rate rises of .25% each month for about the next 4-6 months. So their rates may increase by about 1% by Xmas. And if the people here in Australia keep borrowing then we may see a rate rise here too. Especially on top of high job vacancy rates.
Anyway – thats why some buy and some people sell. Your buying and I just sold one recently.
Me personally thinks there will be better opportunities in the next 12-18 months.
But as Jan Somers says about timing whats important is –
1. Time in the market (ie. hold for as long as you can) and
2. Buy whenever you can afford it (ie. its financed correctly – got a decent deposit etc).So in other words it does not matter when you buy.
The Article said
The quarter-percentage-point increase in the federal funds rate will likely be only the first of many rate hikes over the coming months as the central bank returns interest rates to a neutral level.
The vote in the 12-member committee was unanimous. All twelve Fed banks also requested an increase in the largely symbolic discount rate, an unusual level of consensus.
The central bankers signaled that they would raise rates at a slow but steady rate, probably a quarter point hike at each meeting, economists said.
My analysis –
Kool. The I have anticipating the above and am waiting for opportunities to arise over the next 12-18 months. Property prices wont increase much if at all and may fall further in places – so there is no hurry to get into the market further now. Rents may even increase over this period making it more attractive to make purchases then.
Do you work for Wakelin & Wakelin?
I have read the book Streets Ahead and its the other extreme to McKnight. ie. within 10kms of city to ve+ cash flow regional/rural.
I invest bewteen Streets Ahead and McKnight. But in the long term I favour the Streets Ahead theme.
It would make no difference at all. Who looks at the state Trustees web site anyway to buy a property.
I would prefer to have a home sold by an agent of one of the beneficies than just the state trustees appointed one.
Who would really want the job.
They need to do the following;
1. Richo is a good player but his body language in a team sport is shocking. Sort it out.
2. Get players who can kick to a player not the opposition. Rodant, kellaways, gasper, krakaouer, chaffey, zantuck the list is bloody endless.
3. Get some aggro to get the hard ball – get rid of campbell, pettifer, bowden, hilton, fiora, tivendale, houlihan,
4. Gasper – reduce his contract term and pay.
5. Brad Ottens – get him to achieve half his potential.
6. Give Coughlan the captaincy.
7. Give the kids a go.
Thats about it.