We have 2 girls aged almost 5 and almost 6. They love our property business. We have named our Trust “Saraclo”, after their names Sarah & Chloe. They now think that they own blocks of units and houses.[]
The girls always point out older types of houses that have “for sale” signs on them, and say “mummy here’s one!! I love their input, and even though they DO still get tired of looking through house after house, they understand why we are doing it. They are learning lots about what and why we’re doing this, and I’m sure that they will have their heads screwed on the right way, when it comes to money, in a few years.
They are getting the best education from us, and understanding that it is good to save money.
Vendor finance as an investment strategy can be a really worthwhile tool, to improve cashflow, and refund some of your money in the deal to enable you to have cash to buy again.
However, you mentioned structural problems with the house. I would be careful that you are not setting yourself up for a lawsuit if something goes wrong. You would have a duty of care over the property, although you would still have that duty of care as a landlord anyway. Safety is important!
Goodluck with your decision. Make sure you do your due diligence over the tenant, before taking them on as a longterm wrap client.
All our loans so far have been P&I. If we wrap the loan will DEFINATELY be P&I. Things have changed recently now that we’re selling our home, and getting rid of our LOC etc (reducing our “bad” debt).
We have talked about having 3 x P&I loans, to 1 x IO loan, and keeping the majority reducing our overall debt, but with one with good prospect for capital gain at Interest only. 3:1 ratio sounds OK to us at the moment, but no doubt we will reassess things in 12 months or so.
Our main reasoning for P&I is if something happens to one of us, we don’t want the other left with hundreds of thousands of debt!!
It is great for higher taxed people especially self employed.
Why just give that extra tax to the Govt??
I’d rather pay off a house that will gain in value, than giving XXX thousand to Little Johny. He gets enough.
Oh, I don’t have any negative geared ppty. Only positive. I’ve been tempted because of the tax issues, however, it will restrict my positive cashflow purchases. That to me is the worst thing about negative geared ppty. The banks stop lending to you.
My reply probably would have sounded more interesting with a glass of red, but, I’d say nobody will ever be rich with just one or two cashflow +ve ppty’s.
This is where you have the ability to use your money and possibly buy lots of +ve ppty.
I would never own investment ppty outright. You will pay too much tax. There are more fun things to spend your money on.
Hi and thankyou. Yes I definately agree with what you said about deals being harder to find. It would be awful if you sold the home you love to do “investing”, only to find that the “deals” are few and far between.
It would make your decision seem like such a waste.[]
It IS hard to find deals, but if you really are “out there” and ringing agents on a regular basis, you should still find them. You will probably have to expect to look further afield than what you would like to.
If you don’t mind where your IP is, and I mean interstate etc, then I would say “JUST DO IT – SELL, SELL, SELL, sounds like it will be worthwhile for you.