Forum Replies Created
Thanks for relating your experience, K.
Banks tend to be very rigid in their thinking. To take an extreme example:
You could show the bank you have $20 million in net assets (shares say) with no income because it is all reinvested. OK, it is income, but it doesn't go in the bank as cash. Now, if you say to them you want a loan, they'll say you can't service it because you've got no income! Never mind the fact you could turn shares into cash in 5 minutes. It just doesn't gel with them.
I am currently going through the process of obtaining a loan. When they were taking details about my income, I said, "what about my other assets?" They indicated that wasn't particularly relevant.
Anyhow, as I'm still a learner in the area of property, I guess I'll eventually work out some solutions by reading books and through experience.
Thanks for all your input. I appreciate you telling me about your situation as an example, Linda (millions).
Jon
I won't say I hate my job. However, that's all it is – a job that makes me money for investment. Career aspirations went out the door some years ago. What I don't want to do is continue working until I'm 75 like we have been "encouraged" to do by governments. At 46, I definitely want to be out of it by 55 at latest, and have made fair inroads towards my goal.
When it comes to career aspirations in a job, I don't have any. The only thing I have aspirations for is investing money. That's why I want to be a full-time investor. But to me that basically entails both the share market and property for diversity, whereas most seem to be full tilt one way or the other.
You could say I have a passion for investing, something I can't get from a paid job.
I'd like to revisit my post and see if anyone else can further enlighten me.
Let's say I have $200k to put down. Therefore, according to the gurus, I can control $2 million worth of property. Now, to the minor detail:
Who will advance me $1.8 million and how do I service it? If you have the experience, please give the rest of us the nuts and bolts, if you are kind enough and willing to share. Thanks.
Sounds like comparable sales, growth trends and current state of the market appears to be the best means. Then in a negotiation depends where you meet on price, I suppose.
What about the age of the home? Contemporary design built in the last year v brick or timber house built 30 years ago? Which is the more valuable and why, all other things being equal?
I've found this thread quite helpful, so thanks for your input so far.
I am new to property transactions, so excuse my ignorance. I gather every property that goes on the market has an associated contract of sale with the agent. So if I'm interested in buying a property, I get the contract and give it to my solicitor/conveyancer. Would that generally be before or after making an offer?
OK, when you say a written offer, you mean you go to the agent's office and sign a contract for the property, or some other form, or maybe I "scribble" my own offer on a piece of paper? It usually includes a sum of money, yes? 10% sounds ridiculous on an initial offer, but you tell me from your experience the norm.
So let's get to the crux of the matter and spell out the usual form a written offer takes, since from previous threads it's still a little vague. Thanks.
Thanks for the insight, Jon. Let's say a verbal offer is made, accepted by the vendor and there is no follow through to sign the contract. What is the loss to the vendor.? Nothing, as far as I can see. I can certainly understand how a signed contract with a significant deposit would be seen in a better light. However, I still think that all offers, verbal or written, should be taken seriously. This would be especially so in a slow market where a property has been on the market for a while.
My understanding is in most states you have a short cooling off period after an offer has been accepted. Therefore, even with the written offer, you always have that escape anyway. Have I missed something?
I am led to believe you should make a written offer, otherwise the vendor won't take you seriously. I don't agree. Why can't you make verbal offers? Buying a property should be no different to the bargaining you do when buying a car or TV, for example. Making written offers appears a somewhat time-wasting exercise, especially if they want you to dump a 10% deposit everytime – very restrictive.
My thinking is I might have viewed a few potential properties and would be prepared to buy any of them, depending on who is prepared to do the best deal. Could it be they want a written offer, so they can "handcuff" you to their property so you don't show interest in others at the same time?
Years ago when I was looking to buy a new car, I remember a salesman telling me I wasn't showing that I was serious enough about it, based on what I said. He felt I was just "kicking the tyres", so to speak, and maybe even wasting his time. I didn't appreciate him telling me this. So I quickly thought, I don't need this clown. I simply agreed with what he said and left. The very next day I bought the exact same car from another dealership! He lost his next sale just like that.
The point is vendors/agents should take all offers seriously (verbal or otherwise) because they might turn away the most likely person to buy their property.
Found out the EFM isn't very widely available as yet. Not even in every capital city. I'm interested in purchasing in Toowoomba. You'd hardly call this the backblocks with a population of over 100,000. I guess still being relatively new it will be more readily available as time goes on.
OK haz, so you reckon the Liberals are responsible for all this? Let's see Rudd work his magic and turn it all around. This'll be good to watch. I'm gonna take a punt and say things will continue in the same direction.
I don't care about the intimate details and don't want to argue about it. It is known as an equity finance mortgage and what you are saying sounds the same as what I'm saying. What I'm interested in is if anyone has used the product. The product is new and was only introduced this year.
No Richard, it's exactly as I stated – Equity Finance Mortgage – and it works as indicated. Do a search on the internet.
Thanks for the feedback.
I am somewhat inexperienced in this area. It's also a bit like when doing your tax, someone asks who is your accountant. I have never had an accountant in my life. So if I am thinking of buying a property, do I immediately get in touch with a solicitor for guidance? Or is it when I have chosen a property? How does it work? What are the mechanics of the process? What are they specifically going to be helping me with? How do I pay them – by the hour? When it comes to legal matters I guess we are talking some ludicrous rate of pay to consult.
I would appreciate your further input.
kokjhoonwong wrote:OK I voted for Liberal but you will be shocked to know why I did it. So I am not telling.Very often that speculators are wrong especially a financial planner who I grilled the other day. When a guy like (R. Kiyosaki) who is worth so much and stand besides some of the best, I think we should at least listen.Being in this website means to share how we can help each other win. Any real Investors out there who knows what is the best plan to win with the change of govt. Would love to hear your plans and predictions.Now that you dropped yourself in it, tell us why you voted Liberal.
With high profile people such as Robert Kiyosaki, yes, they make us think, but it is up to us to challenge what they say and not just take it all as gospel. He claimed, in one of his books, that when the baby boomers started retiring their withdrawal of investments would drain the global financial system and cause a collapse. From what he said and my calculations this is roughly 2010 – 2015 (1945 + 65). I read the book some years ago and am a little foggy on the detail, but I'm pretty sure that was the gist of it. I'm not saying he is right or wrong, but let's see how it pans out in the not too distant future.
As a share market investor, one of the things I've learnt is not to make predictions. So you won't be getting any from me. My plans revolve mainly around the share market at this stage, and I continue to accumulate investments in whatever environment is created by the Government of the day.
Haz
So you reckon Mr Rudd is going to swing all those numbers the other way and bring them under control? By the way, no need to shout.
Come on kokjhoonwong, I think people in this post are just commenting on how they see the new government, not so much complaining about how it affects their investments.
As far as 5% interest rates are concerned, I'm only drawing a conclusion from the blurb that the Labour Party went on with leading up to the election. They continually rammed it down the throat of the Liberals about the increase in interest rates. One has to conclude Labour can lower interest rates, otherwise what the hell were they on about. Wouldn't have been just to gain a bit of political mileage would it?
Oh, sounds like Mr Kiyosaki has pumped out his next book, has he? What, predicting global doom and gloom? Robert Kiyosaki is very high profile and has a loyal following, but when he speaks it doesn't mean he's right.
Yossarian
How do you see the dismantling of Workchoices? Unions back with full force and the ability to strike at the drop of a hat? What about the influence of people like Shorten and Combet?
So Yossarian, you believe, given time, Rudd will turn the current account deficit into a surplus?
He's going to bring interest rates below 5% and make it so everyone can afford the house they want. I'm looking forward to this. I'll hold off buying my townhouse for the time being then.
I expect interest rates to be lower in six months to a year. Labour pumped the Liberals about how interest rates have been increasing. Let's see what the "miracle worker" can do now the acid is on him.
I hope we don't see unions raise their ugly heads and set us back 20 years.
And I don't want to hear about how it's the Liberals fault for the next three years. You can bet your bottom dollar this claim will surface soon enough.
I am an industrial chemist and have worked in the mines almost all my life – over 20 years. When I graduated it was simply luck of the draw as to what industry I ended up in. As a graduate you take anything you can get when you have no experience. It was my good fortune to get my first offer in mining. Never have I regretted it. If I had ended up working in labs in the city I wouldn't have made much money.
I've generally always worked at the "coalface" with the exception of 3 years as a supervisor. That's the thing, you don't need all the stress of working in management to make good bucks. You can do it stress free as I do now working a basic job as a lab tech. It's a no-brainer. People ask me if I am challenged in my work. I say, "nuh, just the way I like it." Sounds strange to say that, but I left a job that was a pain because of stress. Now, I do a very routine job, make good money and fuel my investment program. The lack of stress is beautiful. I don't give a rat's about my career as a chemist. In fact, when I see a potential job talking career development, I switch off and look for something else.
Relatively speaking I don't make anywhere near as much as some other professions/trades in mining. An engineering mate who recently moved on from his head office mining job in Perth was making around $127,000 annually. He is taking up a position overseas. No doubt his salary is significantly higher to do it. But as others have said, it involves a lot of time at work. He will be 4 weeks on, but the upside is he then gets 4 weeks off.
I believe some of the trades are in very high demand, so they can command high salaries. So if you have a trade or are uni qualified and you want to get into mining, then I think your chances are good if you persist until you get what you want. If you aren't qualified, I think it's harder, but of course there are many unskilled jobs in the mines also. They tend to be very routine, dirty and physically demanding jobs. Some of these jobs may not pay as well as people believe, but it still would be much better than the equivalent in the city.
The climate is the other thing to consider. Lots of mines are located in trying conditions. If you have a goal, set your plan and are willing to stick it out for some years, then you can really set yourself up. I have seen lots of people who make big money, but can't keep it. What's the point? Don't waste your time in these places if you are going to blow it all.A lot of the media coverage tends to contain hype, I think. They make out as if you can ring up tomorrow and get a job straight away. Yeh right. Maybe the odd person can under some circumstances. Those short features on current affairs shows don't give you the whole story.
If you are keen to get into mining, I'd say be persistent and register with as many of the recruitment agencies (who specialise in mining) as you can. If you can relocate to a mining area that would be a good way to go, but the expense of living there without a job initially may be snag. You could do anything to start with, just to pay the bills. You'd probably find a job in some other area quickly because they can't keep their workers who have all moved on to mine jobs! I have heard of local industry crying out for workers for this reason. They just can't compete.
Anyhow, those are my thoughts. Best of luck if you want to give it a go. You'll never regret it financially.
islandgirl
I doubt you could class Margaret Lomas a dream stealer. I'd say she's more like the voice of reason. I tend to agree with most of the comments in this post about finding a strategy to suit you. When you are inexperienced you don't want to fall into the trap of becoming a romantic. This is when you take everything you hear, particularly at seminars, as gospel.
You need to have goals to inspire you, but don't make them so unrealistic that you set yourself up for disappointment. I think newbies have a tendency to go to seminars and read books, then pluck a strategy and expect it to work anywhere and anytime. Never underestimate the amount of knowledge and experience required to apply these strategies and be successful. It's not going to happen immediately following a seminar or having read a book. Further knowledge and years of experience are necessary.
Some people get lucky (so do lottery winners). They happen to start out when the market is about to boom. They then think they are geniuses and gush to everyone how easy it is. This is not a blueprint for investing success. Good fortune is a good thing to have, but long term you are going to need more than that.
Forget all the hype that screams at you from magazines and promotional material. A lot of this is just crap. Be realistic about what you can achieve and take it step by step. As you progress, if you find yourself becoming very good at what you do, then great continue to take the next step and make haste slowly.
Will leave you with one further thought. Let's say you have a dream to become a best-selling author. If I put it to you that you better have a backup plan and your chances might be slim, would you call me a dream stealer or the voice of reason? However, my comments should not deter you from your dream to write a book.
My point exactly jsawtell. You had to waste valuable time on those two properties.
"Yes wouldn't it be great if we just told you everything about the property, then you would not have to look at it just send the cheque in the mail. Sorry for the sarcasm, I just can't help myself."
Jon
That sounds like a response I would expect from a real estate agent. We can sit back and say it's all too difficult. But how do you think things change and improve in this world? Not by saying, "we can't do that."
There is a term used in various circles I despise: "tyre-kicker". Some people like to dump this on you when you are taking the time to research investments and so on. That is a weak attempt to force a person to make a snap decision. The point here is if I could see the floor plan size of a house and think it's not the right size, then I won't waste your time and you won't call me a tyre-kicker. Otherwise I'm going to have to waste your time looking at properties that turn out to be obviously not suitable as soon as I step through the door (as indicated by jsawtell in his response).