Valuer General (fax 0894298460) in WA will fax back last purchase date/price on a particular property and sales values of 70 others for $14 or 110 properties by e.mail for $22. The “other” properties can be split over two areas ie 35 around two different properties. My search yesterday was answered within 1/2 hour.
Judith, is there a website for the WA valuer general that you know of?
There has been heaps of discussion about the bubble bursting.
All those predicting it,(including me) will be right…..one of these days. Even a broken clock is correct twice a day![]
What makes me think that it won’t happen just yet, is the fact that all the financial comentators are preaching a fall in property prices.
Standard contrarian theory says that we have to wait till they have given up and all turned positive, or at least stop preaching…….THEN we will get our property crash.
Clitheroe has always been biased towards shares, and you would fully expect him to be bearish on property. He was preaching shares, shares, shares, and bagging property 2 or 3 years ago.
What has happened since then? Property has absolutly flown and share investors(but not traders[]) have been slaughterd.
Chee
I agree with what you are saying but there is only one problem. Because of the property bubble there are no “affordable new quality properties in good locations” left. The trick is not to overpay and at the moment every property on the market will cause the buyer to overpay. Sure some will still grow from this high base, but they are still overpriced now. We will have to wait for the bubble to bust before we can buy without overpaying again!!!
Totally agree HousesOnly!!!
As some financial sage(whos name escapes me atm) of old said:
Buy in gloom-sell in boom!
Well we don’t have so sell if we dont want to, buy the buying in gloom bit sure makes sense.
This is the basis of his reply:
“It is not possible to make an unethical system ethical. This is the problem of wraps. Many consumer advocates oppose them and, as you may know, several states are now looking into them. Warnings are being issued in WA, SA, ACT and Tasmania.”
An excerpt:
There is one question that every wrapper, or supporter of wrapping, always seems to sidestep. It is a question that goes to the heart of the wrapping debate. The answer to this question effectively destroys any argument in support of wrapping. At least, on ethical grounds.
The question is this: What happens to the buyers (the wrappees) if the investor (the wrappers) fail to pay the lender on the ‘head’ loan held by the investor?
The answer is that the buyers lose what they thought was their family home. Plus their deposit. Plus all their payments. Plus any money spent improving their home.
************************************
This is a valid concern and one that should be adequately adressed to ensure the future of the wrapping process; otherwise the regulators will step in and ruin it for everybody.
Firstly, I have no position on which is better, – or +, was just using shares as an example. And just for the record, I don’t like negative geared property investment for my PERSONAL circumstances, so I am going a fair way in agreeing with you.
But for certain investors negative gearing can be a fabulous wealth buiding tool.
Going back to my share example: Lets replace xyz with COH-Cochlear. This company if leveraged with margin lending would never have been positively geared. But imagine if you had puchased COH @ $2.50 and margined it when possible…adding aggressively to the position as increased equity allowed……HOLY SMOKE i’m not even going to do the calcs because I will kick myself for not doing it[] but it would be in the 100’s% if not 1000’s% return on investment.
Better than any high div stock that I can think of!!!
That being said, it is possible to have found high dividend, relatively high growth share as well.
This of course is far more difficult in the property market.
Generally, if there is a high expectation of capital gain, the relative yield will be lower, as you will be paying a premium, just as in shares. How much premium is of course the key issue.
A nice piece of negative geared property, at the right time in the cycle(NOT NOW) at the right price, in the right area(say beachfront or similar) for the right investor, would be a wonderful investment and hard to beat with positive geared property.
Again I re-iterate I wouldn’t do it myself cause it doesn’t suit my personality or circumstances. I prefer to do the same sort of thing with shares for a host of different reasons; ah la my example above.
“most of my properties are -ve geared BUT +ve cashflow”
And just how do you get negative gearing from positive cashflow? I think you forgot that negative gearing requires a ‘negative’ part.
All you bunnies who think neg gearing has advantages, STATE THEM. Provide worked examples. Give us evidence, not opinion.
I think we are talking cash positive but with a tax loss due to depreciation of building/fittings etc.
Am I right Fester?
Crashy….re negative gearing; think shares m8
you buy 1000 share of xyz at say $30, margined with a lvr @ 70%, so your cash outlay is $9000-toatal value of position $30000
Interest rate is say 7% and the dividend is say 3.5% grossed up……you are negatively geared, right?
One year later the share is trading @ $35…..(and we flogg that sucker, locking in our profit[][}])
capital gain = $5000
dividend = $1050
interest = $1470
Total Profit = $4580 …..51% return on capital thanks very much.
All relies on capital gain though which will be harder to come by in property imo, but thats how it works. Very simple and in the last 4-5 years its been like taking candy from a baby.
Just as Jester has said, very good info if you are an average consumer wishing to buy or sell a home.
My “promoting self interest detector” registered only a slight reading. But thats ok, nothing wrong with promoting your business. He has just disguised it as “consumer protection”
I saw two major purposes for the meeting.
1/ Finding people who were interested in selling in the near future and convincing them to use a Jenman agent. Although he stated he wouldn’t be promoting any particular agent, he ended up promoting the local “Jenman Approved” agent by name, which here in Cranbourne is Finnings.
2/ This is the subtle one[] finding potential “agents representitive” candidates. The Jenman group makes money by training candidates and placing them in member offices.
He did promote a method of real estate investment which was as you might imagine, very conservative; purchase a property with at least 7% gross yield, finance with a PI loan and have enough deposit to at least make the investment cashflow neutral…in other words have a big deposit.
He is an impassioned speaker and quite entertaining. All in all a good thing for mums & dads but nothing really for the property investor.
I personally would not get involved with wrapping as I feel that you are taking advantage of other people,
As one considering doing this type of business I must confess to being somewhat perturbed by this argument. Undoubtably some unscrupulous wrappers are indeed doing nasty things to the less fortunate.
But lets not throw out the baby with the bath water,eh!
A few quick parallel arguments:
A doctor makes money fixing people when they get sick
A panel beater makes money fixing peoples smashed up cars
A mechanic fixes your motor when you’ve put a piston through the block dragging your mate off at the lights.
I could go on ad nauseum but you get my point.
All of these professions make money from people in unfortunate circumstances….in some cases great wads of money (brain surgeons etc)
After thinking about this somewhat I am now rather amused when this “taking advantage of others” argument is presented.
Surely an ethically constucted and executed wrap contract can only be a positive thing, as it is fulfilling an important need in society – home ownership for “credit rating challenged” individuals.
1/ Trading is dead simple but its not easy[?] The mathematics involved are about 3rd grade standard(thankfully[]) It is the psychological factors that make it hard. Not many manage to overcome these, and thats why most struggle.
2/ Trading teqhnique tends to be quite poor. Most traders I know are “breakout” traders…they’re buying when I’m looking to sell. The most successful traders I know buy at support and sell at resistance. Thats why its psychologically hard; you are buying when the chart looks like s**t and selling just as the chart looks good to most people.
If you lined up twenty plumbers only one would be doing really well. Does that mean that plumbing is not a good business? Of course not!!!…..it’s the same old 95/5 principle that applies right throughout humanity.
How many property investors are doing REALLY well? I personally dont know any. But of course we all know we can be property millionares overnight, just like Henry Kaye said[]
3/ (yeah I know I said 2 points[:0)]) It is hard to tell who is really doing well!!!!
Taking myself for instance, I hardly spend a cent ’cause I’m keeping as much capital as possible in the account for compounding until I’ve got 1.5-2million in there. Then I can live off dividends and not trade every day if I don’t want to.
Hence, I live in a modest home, I drive a 1964 volkswagen, and wear the same old rags I’ve had for years.
Hardly a picture of wealth but thats the way I like it!
Just wait till the next sharemarket boom and everybody will be saying how easy it is again, just like right now in the property market.
Soon many many property investors will be whinging about property. Then it will be up to the 5% with the tenancity and will to make money in a flat/down market who will be secretly laughing all the way to the bank.