This is something I am wondering also – I’m surprised it hasn’t been discussed more here.
As there is no new contract at the end of the wrap when title officially passes, I would imagine the new stamp duty couldn’t be due then – it must be due when the Instalment Sales contract is drawn up, at the start. However I am no lawyer (yet – only one in training!) so it would be great to hear the advice you receive.
I think the sticking point is that the new duty only applies to sales where a 12% profit as a minimum is made. So if you arrange your wrap so that the markup is say 11.9%, (and then have a higher interest rate markup) then you won’t have to worry.
Look forward to seeing what other NSW wrapper’s think…
I would imagine that the new stamp duty would be due when the Instalment Sales Contract is signed.
That is, a wrapper would pay the normal stamp duty on purchase (calculated on the price at which they purchased the property), as well as the new stamp duty (calculated on the price they onsold the property at) – as long as their markup was 12% or greater. Essentially they are being double taxed at time of purchase.
Perhaps NSW wrappers will get creative and only markup properties by 11.9%, and charge a higher interest margin to avoid being double taxed at the start of the wrap??
The CGT is calculated based on the number of years you rented the place vs. lived in it. In your case since it would be 14 years as PPOR and 1 year as IP you would only pay CGT on 1/15 of the gain. Mind you its not as simply as that, you would need to get an accountant to work it out, however it would be roughly that amount.
You can’t use the FHOG unless you intend living in the property. However, your wrap purchaser can use the FHOG as part of the deposit they pay you. All they need to do is fill out your details under the ‘who to pay’ section of the form (in NSW)
Can you explain where the loophole is, because I thought you had to have ‘entered into a contract for the purchase of a home’ to qualify – can 12 month year old kids enter into a contract to purchase a home?
I once spoke to an accountant who recommended I change my address with the RTA for a couple of weeks so I would qualify for the FHOG on an investment property. I decided this wasn’t the kind of person I wanted to work with.
I have no problem taking money from the government when its legitimate, but not when your own ethics are at stake.
Saturday morning at 10am in Sydney on 2UE (AM 954) is Residex’s John Edwards with ‘Find Me a Home’ (www.findmeahome.com.au), where people can register to call up and John will assess the value of the home, and talk about the real estate market in that area, etc.
Purely on the basis of prices you might want to look at Glen Innes/Inverell/Uralla as well as Bourke/Cobar and Broken Hill.
Depending on what type of transaction you are looking at doing, it may not matter whether the population is declining or not. For example if you are wrapping there is a good chance that you won’t ever need to worry about finding another tenant for the property.
Be careful wrapping in the remote towns (esp Broken Hill) because there may not be any lawyers who are familiar enough with the concept to be able to advise potential purchasers.
I am the first uni student who is willing to admit it I’m studing Finance/Law. I also work part time in a Stockbroking firm and have previously worked in Banking. Currently studying property and trust law which sounds a lot more interesting than it is!
Is that $1.05 million? Wow – well it depends on your attitude toward debt and how leveraged you want to be – if you used it for multiple property deposits then you certainly have the opportunity to make huge gains, but perhaps you could look at going for a 60 or 70% lvr on some higher capital growth properties (which might be +cf at this lvr too).
Or you could wrap and probably have enough to cover – what… 20 or 30 houses without any problem?
I’m sure you will find most of what you need to get started in Wealth Guardian… although it is unlikely anyone will tell you the “right” way to set up a trust because there isn’t one!
Broadly speaking there are three main types of trusts (that I am aware of):
a) Discretionary trusts
b) Unit trusts
c) Hybrid trusts (like a combination of a and b)
While there is some merit to hybrid trusts (negative gearing is still possible) Wealth Guardian and most +cf investors would recommend discretionary trusts as they are more flexible when it comes to income splitting.
Once you have decided on the type of trust you need to decide who will be trustee… the trustee can either be a individual(s) or company. Your decision here will usually involve looking at potential costs, and the asset protection benefits of both. The arguments for both are put forward in Wealth Guardian.
When you are starting out you really need to consider what your investing goals are going to be. There are many discussions regarding good accountants/solicitors in different parts of the country on this forum, so I would recommend doing a search and finding one to go meet with.
Why do you need to sell it? My advise would be not to sell it just because you have decided you want to go +cf… There may be room for a negatively geared property in the portfolio if:
a) There are high rates of potential Capital growth in the area (thus potential to borrow against it for +cf properties – remember you can personally lend to the trust as well)
b) The property is close to becoming + cf as you repay the loan
c) The money you would pay in transaction fees and CGT outweighs the loss you are currently making in the property.
I’m not saying that negatively gearing is necessarily good but you need to put a decision like selling a property into perspective…and consider your ultimate investment goals.
Lots of questions…all which generally have the same answer, that is – depends on your investing goals!
Kristine:
quote:
what is a CGT Event
Put very simply, it’s caused by a change in legal ownership of an asset (shares, property…etc)
mcdeyess:
quote:
Can I ask where your information was sourced?
Wealth Guardian is a good starting point. I also recommend DaleGG’s “Trust Magic”…however a lot of my information is just from talking to accountants, reading websites, etc…
Hame:
quote:
company structured trust gives continuity in that individual trust accounts become untidy if and when the appointed benificeries either die or move on
true to a point. However it is pretty easy for the Appointor or a trust to sack the current trustee and appoint a new one. So as long as you have at least some family members under 60 you shouldn’t have a problem
madeinoz:
quote:
Is it better investing through the trust or the company?
Most people would agree trust, because it is likely that the company is also a beneficiary of the trust. If you only invest through the company you are effectively locking in a 30% tax rate, whereas if you invest through the trust with a company as a beneficiary you are only limiting your tax rate at 30%
Your question on structuring really depends on your current financial situation and your investment goals. However…
quote:
company with a trust fund or just a company or neither
The three structures you mention:
1. Company as trustee – this is the best structure according to Steve’s Wealth Guardian because it allows asset protection through the corporate trustee and income splitting through the trust.
2. Company – any profit made by a company is charged tax at 30% so generally companies are not great ways of purchasing income or CG generating assets.
3. Individual – is fine if:
a) You are going to negatively gear (and pay a lot of tax)
b) You have a low income and only plan on buying a small number of + cf properties
c) You want to ‘test the waters’ before setting up a better structure
4. You didn’t mention individual trustee – I actually like this option because it’s a cheaper way to start, still offers the same income splitting benefits, and its fairly easy to add a corporate trustee later on for more asset protection. In all honesty, if you have the right insurances you shouldn’t be too concerned about a having a company trustee unless you have a large portfolio.
quote:
when do you do this before you buy your 1st investment or after your 5th
If you are serious and want to build a large portfolio it may be difficult to purchase in your own name now, then transfer to a trust later (especially one with a corporate trustee) as this is a change in legal ownership which triggers a CGT event.
quote:
what are the cost involved to set this kind of thing up??
Company – $1200+
Trust – $500+
Individual – free.
We paid $550 to set up a trust with individual trustees recently…all you then need to worry about is the annual trust tax return which may be a couple of hundred dollars.
Make sure you have another reason for setting up a family trust other than to save tax – the ATO scrutinises people who don’t appear to have any other reason for it.
Maybe a better idea would be to distribute some of the trust’s income to yourself as well.