Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 301 through 320 (of 510 total)
  • Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510

    We'll see, I guess.

    My bet is that, even if we are at the bottom, prices aren't going to go up quickly. Too much uncertainty out there. I am not so sure that there are enough buyers left for all the stock on the market either, now that a lot of speculators chasing capital gains have given up on it.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    Dale Lynch wrote:
    The Government is looking for a way to stimulate the economy by increased spending, and tax cuts. How about granting tax deductibility on borrowing costs for the family home to make it more equitable.

    Investors receive deductions for investment properties, so why not grant this right to home owners to allow for a stimulus to the construction of new homes, and reduce the shortage of rental property situation, and the potential for demand on public housing.

    Win-win all round, with a boost to employment, and a reduction in people falling victim to the housing affordability crisis.

    How do you know plans for this, in the event of a big enough price downturn, don't exist?

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    harb wrote:
    Have you heard the latest from the GW academics ? The reason we didn't have an increase in global temperatures so far is because of all that pollution coming out of India and China. The smog blanket reflects the sun's rays and it helps to keep the planet at least 1-2 degrees cooler then it would otherwise be, which would imply that if the Chinese & Indians ever stop polluting we are all doomed.

    Hey Harb,

    Off current posts but back on original topic – do you still think property prices can't undergo a major downturn? You still a proptimist?

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    Yossarian wrote:
    The fact that the vast majority of scientists are academics and public servants earning well less than the average RE agent is sufficient to put the latter to rest and if you were familiar with the nature of peer-reviewed research across the scientific community you would know that the former just aint possible.

    I know a few REAs that want to be public servants now:)

    Industrys, and the people in them, support themselves – peer-reviewing has more chance of re-enforcing a given group's POV than bring it to legitimate question. 

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    Yossarian wrote:
    Yeah, all those atmospheric scientists driving Ferraris, theoretical physicists sunning themselves on yachts and molecular biologists skiiing in St Moritz.

    They're *clearly* in it for the money

    How about in it for the industry? Proof of future employment? Convince the public that there is a reason to need the scientific community and not opose the grants.

    Also, like Harb noted, there is a political side to this. Governements need a crisis to keep the public in control. The right has opted for terrorism and war, the left likes the environment. Either way, it isn't so much about making individuals rich as it is about convincing the public that there is a reason for those individuals to be employed.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    hbbehrendorff wrote:
    get rich quick scheme for the scientific community ?  Are you serious ?  Is that as far as your mind will allow you to comprehend ?

    So the poor little owners of the central banks who control the vast majority of the worlds economy who are just humble enough to give there services so that us the tax payer can buy there carbon credits that they make out of thin air when they are entered on a computer screen for the purpose of giving even MORE power and control to the banking cartel is all because of a few NWO funded scientists ?

    They don't even care if everyone knows there secret anymore,  They are that bold they just admit they are taking us for everything we got.

    How many get out of jail free make up the rules as you go bankster fraud is good 700 billion dollar cheques have to be written before you work out this is just a little bit more higher up the food chain and more organized then your local crook science group playing a prank ?

    Who cares where and how deep the rabbit hole goes? The scientific community is as much a capitalistic industry as the next in this day and age. I keep telling you Darth Maul that as hard as some conspirational bankers may be working for world domination behind the scenes, it is our attitudes that seal our fate – not the bankers plans.

    And, in the wake of the next frozen age, it is all kid of irrelivant. What good are RFID tags on every bank customer when the northern hemisphere is under ice?

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510

    The climate on this planet is cyclic, it has to do with the 'wobble' of the earth on it's axis and a build up to polar shift. There is notthing any of us can do about it. Climate Change due to polar shift is real, is happening and is not our fault. It has happened before and mankind has survived it. I could be wrong but I think it comes around every 12K years. 

    Global warming, on the other hand, is a get rich quick scheme for the scientific community. The scam is convincing us that we are responsible for what is happenning to the planet and that we need the scientists to save us. What we are experiencing is natural, cyclic and unstoppable. All we can do is prepare.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    James62 wrote:
    It appears inner city suburbs are currently incurring significant losses in some areas & outer suburbs are holding values… Will these price drops eventually flow into the outer suburbs?

    One hopes…

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510

    The crisis is not only fear. Assets are overvalued and the market is trying to work out exactly what they are worth – trouble is that it is turning out to be quite a bit less than what has been invested in them.

    Say I charge $20 PH and make a chair with $20 worth of wood – the base value of the chair is $40, right? Then the delivery man and the retailer have to make a cut, so the chair ends up selling for $80 – $100. That's all good and makes sense but now there are all these middle men and third parties investing in that chair, proping it's price up to $300 or so. But what have the investors or middle men actually done to add value to that asset? What is the chair really worth, especially if it is made in China:)

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510

    It's easy.

    Buy on friday – sell on Tuesday. for the last 6 weeks you would double your money each week if you did that:)

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    CHIS wrote:
    Get into it
    1st homebuyers have never had it so good.
    No stamp duty less than $500K
    21K for a brand new home. 14K for your first home. I wish I'd had this opportunity when I bought my first home. This candy won't last. It's expected to be removed in June 2009. If you don't take this opportunity you're crazy. Rent and wait is crazy if you can afford the repayments. The bottom of the market is nigh. The government is giving you 21K for a brand new house. I bet your parents can't afford to do that? Get on the gravy train. This won't last

    The alternative is to rent and watch the property market reverse and live in regret for the rest of your life. It's a deal, it's a steal, it's sale of the century

    Even if what you say is true, it is better to wait until June 2009 (or close to) than jump in now.

    The 14 or 21K will still be there in June and I for one would preffer to wait and see if the Australian property market follows the US and UK market on the downward spiral. If it doesn't, well April/May next year will be the time to buy – more vendors will be desperate and easy to talk down. If it does, then let the governement keep their 14K, the savings when the market hits bottom will be heaps greater.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    Skip101 wrote:
    Tony B wrote:
    Good luck & keep renting.

    Regardless of the FHOG, I'd be encouraging people to get off the rental roundabout, Pretty Basic Tony.

    Not until the prices are what the renter can afford long term. Renting currently makes more sense for many reasons, including;

    1) It's cheaper than buying.
    2) The FHBG is going to stay doubled until at least July 2009.
    3) House prices have far more chance of dropping than going up at the moment.
    4) The renter can start or make their deposit larger.

    $350 PW rent x 52 weeks = 18200 PA. Borrowing $320000 will set you back around $500 PW or 26400 PA. That is $8000 PA that can be saved, not including insurance, rates and so on. The average renter is still (even with grossly overvalued rental prices) around $10000 PA in front of a home owner in a similar sized property.

    Worst case scenario for a renter is that entry level home values increase by more than $10000 over the next 12 months. But hands up (even the Bulls) that think it is likely in current markets?

    There is currently more to loose buying than renting. What is more, any of you renters out there, if the govt. gives you some Xmas money either put it towards a deposit or pay off some debt with it. Buying a new tele, like the governement wants you to do, may keep a salesman employed for a few weeks but is only prolonging the inevitable. There is already so much stock to clear at the big tele stores that you will get a killer deal next year or the year after – and housing is exactly the same.

    Patience grasshoppers, patience… and don't believe the hype.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510

    Arguing about when the depression started is like arguing about weather or not we are in a recession now. If X amount of time in a recession is needed for it to technically be a depression, does the depression actually start with the onset of the recession or when that time has been covered and likewise a recession?

    As to the dates being close this time and last time – it is interesting.

    I also find it interesting that there was a terrorist attack on wall street 7-8 years before the 1929 stock market crash. Who says history never repeats, eh?

    So, if we wish to speculate on our future by our past, we can assume that the looming global depression will hit Australia later, harder and last for slightly less time as we are still primarily a commodoties exporter.

    My advice, get a secure job now and don't worry too much about pay. The guarantee of 45K a year in 5 years is going to be worth heaps more than 105K a year is now.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    devo76 wrote:
    I believe all people on this site should also visit GHPC. ( After all they are constantly on hear spreading there GHPC bible right guys) A newbie will go on there and at first be absolutly horrified as people tell them that 100% without doubt property investing is finished. But as you spend more time on there you realise the quality of the poster and you start to see through them. At this time you throw 90% of there crap to the side and use it for the good information available. At this point it is a useful website.

    I like to read and blog in both this site and that. I feel it gives me a more rounded POV.

    Like Devo says, there are extreme POVs on both sites. I guess it is because property is such an emotional topic in Australia – half the country have thier futires invested in it and the other half see their futures ruined because of it. It has to correct, that much is certain. By how much and when is unknown.

    I feel as badly for some investors as I do some recent FHBs and some tenants (those who stand to have thier places of recidence foreclosed). Reading here shows me that not all investors are greedy scum, only some:) I wish just the greedy scum were going to suffer but unfortunately it doesn't work like that.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510

    Harb, where have you been?

    Global warming may be a myth to some but most scientists agree on climate change. I recon there is sweet FA we can do about it now, it is a natural cycle, like property devaluations:)

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510

    The internet is a wonderous place, step through the scenario to find your answer.

    http://interactive.justice.vic.gov.au/discenarios/scenarioView.do?id=116&bid=234&tid=2

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510

    30(odd)% from the 2007 peak – average house prices of 250K – is sustainable on current wages of 55K.

    So, if prices have already moved 5-10% from last years peak a further 25% is reasonable to assume. 40% may be the elastic low point for any one lucky (or smart) enough to purchase at the right time.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510

    I think, if you are being honest, you may not loose any of your houses.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    wallyt99 wrote:
    I wouldn't personally go that far…. but I was one of the strongest advocates that this was a quiet market and the time to buy.   From what I saw today this is just the calm before the storm, and I will be finding a safe port to weather it out.

    I.E I will rent….rather than buy. 

    I am thinking beachside…..  why buy beachside when it will be under water in 15 years?

    Nice idea:) Enjoy the beach before it's gone…

    This FHBG of 21K is doing funny things to the market, already. I thought it would create a mini boom – and it may – but it seems to have also created a massive dose of fear amongst REAs, investors and vendors. Sure, prices are being whacked up by 7-30K but there is an air of 'this is it – last chance to get out closing down sale' type of thing.

    Kind of wierd that it is co-inciding with spring, the best time to sell… or perhaps not. Media is divided on the topic but if you look around you can find stats on new housing credit created this year and see that, in the last month, it went over a cliff. That's ok, housing credit has gone over a cliff before (and recently too) – just not at this time of year.

    There was all this REI and media hype of undersupply, which may or may not be true – who the hell knows anymore. Whatever, developers have been developing pretty hard, right? And why not? Prices are as high as they have ever been, rental yields likewise and, apparently, there is a shortage of supply. So a fair whack of new stock getting ready for sale from this spring is needed?

    I guess a lot is riding on really strong sales (at whatever price) for the rest of this year.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510

    Henry,

    If you can pay it off before June next year do you really need the 21K:)

    That said, I think you would still be elible if you match all the other criterior. read about all the conditions on the web page and if you have circumstances outside of them, I recon those circumstances are irrelevant.

Viewing 20 posts - 301 through 320 (of 510 total)