Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 281 through 300 (of 510 total)
  • Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    devo76 wrote:
    And if he told everyone a decade ago that it was unsustainable and a correction was coming, quick get out. How many would have missed out on the massive gains in this time. RISK/REWARD. Its up to the individual to decide what ratio they want the mix in.

    True, but there would be no bubble either and the economy would be stable.

    I don't mind people taking risks with their money but the extent of the risk and the amount of people taking them over the last 10 years have had an adverse effect on the finances of those that would prefer to play it safe. That isn't fair.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    Mister wrote:
    But that was pretty freaky when I just noticed your post because we have the exact same situation bythe sounds of it and the RE's are doing the same with us , but then of course they would wouldn't they .

    It would be even more freaky if you were both putting an offer in on the same property… gazumping each other:)

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    wealth4life.com wrote:
    I agree Devo76,

    The point is any person can predict the winner of a horse race when it's finished.

    Every now and then WE all need to put up our hands and say opps nobody is perfect and Steve has done lots of great things and many mistakes like all of us, we're all human even Packer made mistakes.

    Let he who has not sinned throw the first stone …

    This wasn't a horse race.

    Though Steve would have had no idea when this crash would come, I bet he knew that the investment strategies of the past decade were unsustainable and the same for Australia's commodity boom.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    devo76 wrote:
    I guess this is good for me as i would like to retire in 20 years at the earliest. Plenty of time to set myself up .

    You should be right. If not, it is going to be real mad max stuff and how much money you have be the least of anyones worries:)

    It's all the boomers leaving the workforce over the next 10 years that will be the problem (and everyone elses future burden) as their super and other investments are likely shot to hell.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    devo76 wrote:
    What has that got to do with the price of eggs in Tasmania ?

    Generally a vehicle speeding towards a slow moving object (such as pedestrians) results in a CRASH:)

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    harb wrote:
    Maybe in your part of the woods, here in Perth prices went from mid 30s to high 90s during the 80s. Must have been different in Perth.  ;-)

    I was in Perth!

    From memory it was late primary, early high school for me so early 80's. One of the families in our street (older than mine) had a son that killed himself over financial stress.

    Just checked some historical data – from a page you probably trust
    http://reiwa.com/res/res-salesgraph-display.cfm

    The price boom was mid to late 80s. Major recession and high interest rates at the start of the 80s. NG was abolished, remember? that's how bad it was back then – everyone was getting pretty desperate. You might have brought in mid 80's, so around about the perfect time – as 2010/2011 will be this time around.

    harb wrote:
    Not these days, even when I used to be it was only 50% max.

    Well at least you sound like a smart investor. Not trying to bite off too much at any one time.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    harb wrote:
    So you are predicting a prolonged recession and unemployment at 9%  ? I've seen better in early 80's. :-)
    Property prices about to get smashed ? I don't think so. For that to happen we'd have to be in a property bubble which we aren't, despite what the potential buyers on ghpc would want us to believe.  Btw, have you actually been in a recession yourself  or are you just reciting from the ghpc manual ?

    I've lived through 2. Worked through 1 and was a student during my first. Luckilly, then as now, I have been in the government's employ. I have only been a private employee in the early naughties.

    During both recessions, house prices did decline.

    In the 80s, I remember my parent's peers putting of moving, upgrading, holidays, new cars and all sorts of things just to concentrate on the mortgages.

    I had one peer with a house when we went into the 90's recession and he was very concerned about his equity. He worked hard and did a lot of cashies (was in a niche trade) to make sure that he stayed in front. I had friends that worked in the building industry and their incomes suffered quite a bit – went from drinking Turkey to goon:)

    That aside, the build up to this has been far more dangerous then either the 80's or 90's downturns. Our debt levels are more extreme and the correction has been put off (is still being put off) by goverment and bank policy for far longer. Bubbles are bigger, the population spread is more unstable and indulgence is ridiculously high. This is a perfect recession storm, sycronised and global, like the 20s – which only leads to one thing.

    I hope you aren't too highly leveraged harb, because I'd hate to see you loose your sense of humour…

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    devo76 wrote:
    I agree we have more downward movement to go but not evenly across the board. There is some good buying out there now for Ip and PPOR.

    There is better buying out there than there has been for the past couple of years – on this I fully agree. 12 – 18 months and I believe there wil be better buying still.

    Unlike the prolonged bull market we just had, there is absolutely nothing to loose by waiting now. Even if prices don't go down any more, they are not going to rise quicker than a reasonable income can save whilst renting. Remaining employed is the main issue.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    devo76 wrote:
    What i want to know is what happens to prices when they hit bottom. Do we all really believe they will stay there. If things have improved economy wise and sentiment has changed then it is a fair call to suggets that they will trend upwards in value from that low. At what speed i dont know but here we are comparing Aussie prices at the begining of a correction to those that have already had theres. Apparently we tend to follow these other countries so when we are nearing our bottom of the cycle theres a good chance that our housing affordability will look as good if not better than these other countries due to ther prices trending up again. And this does not have to be because of 50% drops. A small correction down for us and a correction up for these other countries will bring things back in line rather quickly.

    Our upward momentum will be based on our economy – not other counties housing markets. I think it is wishful thinking to believe that if the American property market starts to trend up Australia's will also by default. We didn't trend down when they started, did we? Australia always suffers a lag and some states in Australia always lag more than others.

    Besides, who says America will trend up again. This could be it for the US. We may have to wait for China to develop enough to sustain it's own growth before Australia booms again.

    Ultimately, though, you answer is in your question. Housing in Australia will trend up when it is affordable and economically viable to do so. If wages are increasing and employment is going up and commodities are booming, then there is a fair chance the market will trend up again.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    harb wrote:
    Lets see, Brisbane median prices 7 years ago were around $200K  and now they are$400k+  ….Yes, looks like it is "garaunteed to double every 7 years" 
    Even adjusted for inflation you would be well ahead of just keeping your money in a bank.  

    You are still the ultimate proptimist:) Brings a smile to my dial.

    Obviously I haven't been away long enough. I'll check back in another few months and see how your confidence in this market is.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    harb wrote:
    Talking of prices not going up, I came across a February 2006 report and was surprised by the increase in the median prices in most cities since then.  I was under the impression that Perth was the only one to go up noticeably since 2006 and even that by only about $50K, specially since Perth was the last one to boom until mid 2007 with 2008 being a flat or down year for most cities.

    Nah, Adelaide was the last big boom – will hurt equal to, if not harder than Perth by the time it is all done and dusted. Canberra and Darwin prices were also increasing dramatically into 2007. Sydney is the only place that has really stagnated since 2006.

    harb wrote:
    Better then expected considering all that D&G about resources in the papers. The low end of the market seems to be making a slow start and land sales in the cut priced sub $200k market has been picking up but unfortunately the price was not all they cut last year, now  we probably have the smallest blocks of land releases anywhere in Australia.

    So basically, they are trying to sell less for more and wonder why it isn't really going off? I went back to Perth twice last year – it's grown quite a lot but property prices in places like Manduarah were out of control.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    harb wrote:
    Btw, do you get the impression that the sub $500k market in ACT is picking up ? Lots of Under Offer and Sold on re.com since the start of this year.

    There seems to be a bottleneck around 350-400k southside at the moment. 4 beddys on 700m2 blocks are almost good value for money (many being advertised around 390k and probably selling around 370) but the 3 beddys on similar sized land has yet to adjust. The land component is still overvalued and the 3 beddys will drop some more before this year is out.

    I watch allhomes mainly and there are numerous under offers but many of those are also falling through. The grant increases seem to be getting a lot of FHBs to put offers in but less, it seems, are actually getting approved. I have seen a couple of properties under offer one month, gone for a couple of weeks and then back up at the same price or less a month later.

    All that said, there are still more coming on than what are going under offer, prices aren't going up and my deposit is ever increasing…

    BTW back – hows Perth doing:)

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    crashy wrote:
    I think admin has "got some splaining to do"

    no, really

    Have you ever been a mod or ran a forum? it's your forum – you can pretty much do what you want.

    Not saying that deleting posts because of an agenda is honest or ethical but it is the owners forum to do with as they choose.

    Scamps posts drew me here and to the GHPC forums, everyone remembers that he was preaching the crash a year or 2 back. By the same token, everyone with half a brain could see it coming. Unsustainable bubbles always burst.

    Oh, C2, if you are getting good offers in this market – why don't you sell? It's going to get worse, make yourself more liquid now. My 2 cents.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    C2 wrote:
    This is based on the offers I get to buy my properties which aren't advertised but when people go into RE office looking to buy something they get shown my properties and asked to make an offer.

    What is the point of that? If they aren't for sale, why get people to make an offer?

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510

    Seems like the 30% below peak I was arguing may have been a miscalculation – looks like we are heading to 40% or greater now.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510

    I was watching an american economist on the business channel the other night who said that modern capitalism was now fundamentally changed – for good. Easy credit is over and with it so too will be societies based on consumption.

    I'll check back in a few months, when this little crisis hasn't passed and see what you think then.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    devo76 wrote:
    Are you kidding me. You have been waiting for this boom since the 80's. ha ha ha. thats the funniest thing ever. Wow what a financial whizz.  How much money could you have made. I my god im getting a stich from laughing. I gotta go. ha ha ha

    You know what I mean, I have been waiting for a downturn in capitalism as a whole and it is finally happening. Since the 80's greed has been rampant but it is on the mend.

    Why would I be trying to make money if I am waiting for the whole process to change?

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    devo76 wrote:
    Debt???. Didnt say anything about that although without it you would struggle to build wealth. This has been proven many times over. Its just that its become a naughty word at the moment. This will change with time as it did in the past debt bubbles.

    This one will be worse… even you bullish proptimists must admit that something pretty mean is setting itself up this time.

    As for the bottom – I hope it is no less than 3-4x average wage (entry level between 200&250K country wide) because if it gets lower then that the hurt will be too great. I also hope it comes around quickly, like America's did, because if it is too prolonged the job loss will really start to bite.

    This is my hope, not a prediction, for the bottom. 30% of the 2007 peak (so around 20-25% off where we are now), within the next 6-18mths. Due to the next 10-15 years being boomer retirement and asset offloading in a down market, there shouldn't be another boom before 2020 – the boomers, it seems, boomed too early for their own retirements.

    It's funny, this is the downturn I have been waiting for since the 80's but now it's here I hope it doesn't end up as bad as it could get. I am pretty sure that the US as we know it is dead, though.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510

    C2, can you say denial?

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    alani wrote:
    is there going to be a mass influx of retirees next year? did the japanesse  have superannuation systems in place?? 

    when the public service starts sacking boomers so that the governement can get back some of its xmas spendings… yes, most definately.

Viewing 20 posts - 281 through 300 (of 510 total)