Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 261 through 280 (of 510 total)
  • Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    devo76 wrote:
    Not there yet. WA to hurt more than other states. But on average i would say another 10 to 15% drop across Australia. Not a 40% +drop thats for sure. What do i base that on. Nothing. Just what i see when i take a step back and look at whats going on around me.

    10-15% + 5-10% already experienced = 25%. A year ago, you lot thought I was full of it for claiming 30% drops were coming. 25% is pretty close and I am still sure theat the national average drop will be at least 30% by the time this is done.

    40% and above will be in the worst places. Small costal, mining towns etc.

    Where I was wrong is that I thought we would crash hard and fast like America but now it seems we will have the slow Japan style deflation. Better for the country but worse for PPORs buyers. House prices aren't going up any time soon and, though some loans would cost close to current rental prices, long term the best stratergy is still to save as much of the purchase cost as possible (or buy a bigger house) sometime over the next 5-10 years.

    Now, if you want a big tele, get in before July but as close to july as possible (after all the government stimulus do dads are done with). Luxury electronics goods are going to skrocket next financial year for a whole multitude of reasons (none of which will make the producers of retailers any better of).

    The new financial year will also be when we get a good idea of how low house prices will go, I recon.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    WJ Hooker wrote:
    Israel has compulsory army service and it works over there. When we get in charge will fix it.

    They also recruit women into armed roles, don't they?

    I heard that they found in large skirmishes that mixed sex battle groups were a liability as the men always stopped to try and help injured women, instead of advancing at the target.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    water wrote:
    Am i missing something?

    Just the fact that it is a currently deflating asset class….

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510

    Trouble with the modern military (and especially consription) is that, living in a time of equal oppurtunity, consripted males could argue (possibly rightly) that females should also be consripted into combat roles. Also, why should the old age groups 18-35 still apply when we are living longer and the retirement age is going up?

    Consription wouldn't work in a society where individual rights are so paramount and you can't take away the rights of a subsection without taking away the rights of the whole of society. Don't have an answer, just putting it out there.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    devo76 wrote:
    A change sounds like a nice idea. But do we think this is a change or just the general sentiment of a population in a slump. Unfortunately we tend to have very short memories and im sure as things improve the same mistakes will be made again. So i guess it all depends on where you stand. Do you take the moral  high ground and refuse to get caught up in assets values rising to fast(No one will say no to equity when it is handed to them on a plate). Or do you position yourself to make the most of it next time around.  Who knows where we will be in ten years.

    True. But it is a good bet that is is long term this time like the 30s. After the 30's it took the 40s, 50s, 60s and 70s before greed truly corrupted the functioning of society again. 80's led to the 90's which led to now, in an exponential fashion. Sure, one can argue it was growing again before the 80's but not to the extent where it outwieghed reason or social/governemnt control.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    WJ Hooker wrote:
    1. No dole money just coupons
    4. Sack state governments
    8. Reintroduce conscription
    9. No money for single mums – just coupons.
    11. Mass production of solar cells, compulsory solar cells and solar hot water to all new houses creating jobs.
    12. New dams built, compulsory recycling of water.
    13. Massive tree plantings and public transport infrustructor projects.
    That will do for a start. Next please.

    I cut your list to those likely to occur, with some ammendments.

    1. Is closer than many believe. Not coupons but 50% controlled payments. Hard part is policing the store owners.
    4. Is in the pipelines. State governments will not be disbanded, however. More likely rolled into the Federal banner or local councils that will report directly to the Fed. Govt.
    8. Outside of Australia's control. Depends on what happens with US/Afghanistan/Iraq/Isreal/Palestine and others. A possibility.
    9. Hand in hand with 1. Same thing for aged pension.
    11. Wishful thinking. Plan is too long term and governement isn't thinking that way… yet.
    12. See 4 & 11.
    13 Will occur faster than 4,11 & 12.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    C2 wrote:
    ummester,
    I'm not denying oz is in hard times or that there could be problems for some but just pointing out that when people make references to Japans bubble and deflation they need to understand it was not brought on by economic policy or debt as we understand things to be.  

    Yes and No. There is an uncomplicated way of looking at this, without the smoke and mirrors of politics and economics. If Rudd succeeds, we end up with slow deflation of assets values, very much like Japan. If he fails, we end up with fast deflation, very much like America.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    Tony B wrote:
    Just have a look at whats happening in our great country, people 55 to 60 are now returning to the work force, why, because they have no money to retire on. Mum chucks the 2 kids in a child minding centre at 7.00am to 5.00pm so she can go to work because if she does not work, they cant pay.

    The growth we have seen is not sustainable and most times is followed by a correction its those that brought 2 or 3 years back that have to sell that will loose big time.   If it was to double every 7 years you would have to sell it for $2,146,641.  Now this is not profit its gross and not likely, forget about historical figures. Providing you can keep 2 wages coming in, a job, not get pregnant, get ill, or need to shift for work, interest rates stay at 5% over 25 years (not likely)  Think about it.  This is a slog, a struggle, a real sacrifice, a near impossibility that will take its toll on owners & disillusioned investors. This is provided you do it at 25yo not 35 or 40.

    WJ the world is indeed a changing place and I'm afraid its not for the better. 

    I took snippets of your post Tony B – though it was all reasonable.

    Wether or not it is changing for the better depends on your POV, doesn't it? All of those things that you mention are not good things and most of them are the result of over speculation, unformed investment/credit/purchasing and greed. The changing world could lead to changing ideologies on these fronts.

    Imagine it, Mum's actually raising their kids again, young tradies learning the ropes through discipline, houses being built properly… I know it all sounds so impossible.

    But heres the thing, I read more and more of property Bulls becoming moderate and I realize that the first of many small steps are being taken.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510

    katelea,

    I don't know legal ins and outs, just basic tenants rights in the NSW area.

    Surely the tenants are aware that you plan to sell? Perhaps you should just approach them directly, or via the agent, to break the deadline to them. You sound like you have been a good landlord and, as long as your tenants are reasonable people, they should try and accomodate you. From the tenants POV, if you tell them now they get 42 days to find a new place rather than 30 (assuming you are in NSW).

    Even if you serve the notice after the exchange of contracts the tenants can leave before the full 30 days so you may loose rent if they find something quickly anyway.

    Also, if you serve the notice before the settlement and the tenants don't leave then you have done everything in your power to ensure vacant possession. Not sure of the exact laws but am fairly confident that you cant be found in breech of contract for tenants that fail to leave after they have been served a valid notice. It would be the new owners problem with the tribunal then, wouldn't it?

    Only downside is that the contract fails, buyer can't get finance or something. In this case you could always go back to the tenant and offer them to stay till another buyer comes along.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510

    How quick you can get a tenant out depends on what state you are in – I believe it is 30 days for property sales in NSW and 8 weeks in the ACT. Not sure of other states. Surely the most prudent thing would be not to agree on vacant possession until you know that the tenants can be removed in time for the sale and that the tenants agree to move without the need for a court ordered eviction in time for the sale.

    BTW, it is nice that you are taking the tenant's issues into account.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    harb wrote:
    If this is how you really feel about property in this country then I feel sorry for you because you will forever be renting while waiting for prices to fall to what you perceive as good.  The only problem with that is the seller also has to consider your offer good value and accept it or else its NO DEAL.
     
    Anyway, I think you are wrong and properties in this countries are undervalued. I'm not sure what type of property you are looking for,  in what city or what price range but I can assure you that you are wrong, prices are very affordable and at the bottom of the cycle. Now its the best time to buy and you will never buy it this cheap again.  Yes it was a spruike but not less accurate then your comment and at least just as helpful.   

    properties in this countries  – I never knew you had a literacy problem Harb.

    You must be bored like me today and come to argue the point we have been for the past year or so. Sellers and buyers will both meet the market.

    Quote:
    And you know that how ? Did the guys at ghpc let you look into their crystal ball ?  A third of the bears there probably reside OS and are only s*it stirring, a third are students who live with mum & dad and the remainder have bought properties recently. Now why would you think they've done so if properties are incredibly overvalued and have further to drop ? 

    In 3-4 years you could be looking at lower prices but you could also be looking at double the current prices, who knows ? I do remember experts predicting price falls of 10%-15% and recommending people not to buy for 2-3 years until prices corrected , that was in late 2000 and what followed is history.

    40% falls in some US states is also history.

    A year or more ago I predict that the economy of the western world is in for doom and gloom because we are all living beyond our means. You dismiss it and preach that property is the ultimate investment that can never fail. Who seems closer to the truth now?

    harb wrote:
    ummester wrote:
    The great Australian dream ain't all it's cracked up to be – think outside that box.

    That's a funny thing to say seeing how you are waiting for a price crash to buy into that dream.

    None of us should be sold a dream that requires parents not to have time for their children.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    crashy wrote:
    harb, its GLOBAL warming…..not hemisphere warming buddy! there isnt a "northern hemisphere CO2 tank" ya know.

    secondly, you realise its winter there right?

    thirdly, an armchair scientist like you would surely know that global warming symptoms include colder winters, ie worse extremes?

    fourthly, didnt the U.S & UK have record heat waves during their summer?

    as for A/C heat pumps, that has NO net effect on warming, since it merely transports heat from one place to another. no heat is "created". you could however argue that the electricity used to run them contributes to global warming.

    I am and have always been with Harb and Devo here (unlike property).

    You can describe climate change as global warming if you want. Trouble with that is that global warming has now been associated with a phenomenom caused by humans, where as climate change is not.

    Yes, the planet is heating up and sometime within the next 1000 or so years it will get very cold again but this is predominantly because of the way the Earth moves around the sun, on it's axis and the way the bodies in our solar system interact with each other. So long as we are clear on that, call it whatever you want.

    I like the 'dawing of the age of aquarius' myself.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    elliequinn wrote:
    Ummester, I suggest that you do not judge until you know. It's not a good feeling to be pregnant with your first child, get fired from your so called secure job by a bitch of a boss, have them threaten you if you take them to court, default on your mortgage cause you have no other way of making an extra $700 per week, have your husband working 100 hours a week to try and make the deficit, fight, nearly divorce, nearly lose the baby and in the end have to go bankrupt chasing the great Australian dream.  You try doing that before you judge people… I was cautious with my mortgage, I just didn't bet on getting fired! I am not saying my situation was any worse than anyone elses and I am grateful for our second chance.

    I feel sorry for you in this situation but property in this country has been and is still incredibly overvalued. Exactly the kind of stress that you went through here is what is being corrected and why I stress that jumping into property now will just bring you more heartache.

    In 3-4 years, however, you should be fine. Though I still belive that the idea of investing in residential property by average Joes is to the detriment of society and will always lead to more situations like yours.

    And, BTW, how do you know what I have and have not lived though? The great Australian dream ain't all it's cracked up to be – think outside that box.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    freelance2020 wrote:
    ummester wrote:

    How about having a go at doing something constructive…

    Why waste your time on this forum if you have nothing constructive to contribute to this discussion?

    Obviously, what is 'constructive' and what is not is a matter of opinion…

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    elliequinn wrote:
    And as for making money for jam, I am working damn hard in my job and I budget everything and am looking to partially replace my income within ten years time. I am not looking for a quick fix, I know they do not exist, I am just trying to create a future for myself and my children, and not have them ask all the time "Mummy, why don't you spend any time with us?" because I am working full time. I do not want to become rich, just comfortable…. So next time, have a little consideration before you comment.

    Oh by the way, I have actually spent five years at University 'learning a skill that society actually needs' and am now happily employed performing that skill, however as much as I love my job, I don't always want to spend 40 hours a week in it! It would be nice to see my family more.

    So spend time with your kids. They are more important than any kind of financial or material gain you can make in your lifetime. Your kids are real and wealth is an illusion.

    How much do you need to be 'comfortable'?

    Without you working (or with you moving to part-time hours), can you afford clothes that fit, food and a roof over you families heads? Do you need anything other than that?

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    kum yin lau wrote:
    Unmester, if your properties have depreciated, then you must have bought badly.

    My properties certainly have not depreciated yet.

    KY

    Then you must have bought a while back.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    freelance2020 wrote:
    Ummester,

    Don't be hard on Elliequinn, everyone's entitled to have a go. She's still saving for a deposit whilst researching the market. I'm sure someone who has suffered bankruptsy isn't going to throw their money around again without thinking it through.

    Really?

    Why do you think the world is in the mess it is currently in? Perhaps because the whole of western society has been throwing it's money around without thinking it through…

    How about having a go at doing something constructive and not trying to make money for jam? How about learning a skill that society actually needs and then working for a living? I know, it's a bizzare concept, and a tough realization, that most of us just aren't the Alan Bonds we thought we were.

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    elliequinn wrote:
    Hello everyone…
    We learnt a very very hard lesson about getting into debt for things that depreciate rather than appreciate in value and I am now researching wealth creation, and have found that property is my preferred method. I never ever in that situation again.

    At the moment, property is depreciating? Doesn't seem like your lesson was learnt hard enough…

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    kum yin lau wrote:
    They say: out of 10, expect 2 high flyers, 2 dogs and 6 in between. I find that if I try to avoid the dogs, I will miss out on the high flyers.

    Why don't they say out of 5, expect 1 highflyer, 1 dog and 3 in between?

    Profile photo of ummesterummester
    Member
    @ummester
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 510
    Mister wrote:

    You can't help but wonder really , any thoughts ?

    Cheers

    Shitting themselves:)

Viewing 20 posts - 261 through 280 (of 510 total)