Local valuers are ideal to discuss these matters with too, after all, they're the ones who place the values on the items you're talking about. .Have a chat with a few for the purpose of pricing and doing before and after valuations, and they'll give you an idea of what those changes are worth.
Ring Dept Fair Trading, request help, just a phone call from them to the Van Park to assess the problem in order to avoid a Tribunal etc. In view of your health, they should be up to one lousy phone call.
If not, ask your solicitor to make one phone call.
Then take it from there, should make things easier, but ensure all your ducks are in a row, especially the written agreement you have with the van park ( hope you have one). If no paper agreement, remove your asset asap.
Sounds like the thermal guy is little money well spent.
Has anyone checked the PRV – the Pressure Relief Valve?
They all eventually wear out, get weak and vent through the overflow pipe, which is sometimes stuck down a drain or somewhere obscure and you can't see it's continuously leaking hot water. Been caught with that one before. They get replaced for about $150 incl callout fee.
If you're living in the property at the moment, you might need to de-clutter so it looks as tidy and functional as a serviced apartment or motel unit, which would create the illusion of more space and create a point of difference with thew other 10 units competing for the attention of buyers and agent.
Also you can immediately create a point of difference in the agent's mind by increasing the agent's commission by $2000, instead of sliding on your price under pressure.
Motels in some areas seem to buck the trends, and apart from some slight ups n downs, just steam along the same.
We've experienced this before with our previous motel during the last GFC, local retailers were suffering badly while for our motel in the same area it was business as usual. Made it difficult dodging the usual "how's business" questions at Chamber of Commerce meetings when retailers tell of suffering $10 days and then ask how's your motel going. Awkward.
Poor tenants, not their fault either way, but they pay you full rent and have to live in a fish bowl while you work out how to recoup the money. I suggest you should've replaced the curtains as soon as you knew there was a problem, and sorted it out afterwards. Definately someone is responsible, hope it goes your way.
Hi, I could write an essay, but try to make it very short – does anybody know what the steps are to get occupants removed that are not on the rental contract? In other words, tenants are wanted, but not the occupants one of the tenants lets stay (since months now), they transfer the house into a nightclub (smoke everywhere, massively disturbing the other tenants, rendering their part of the house "half-livable"). It's tricky, because the tenants are on 1 rental contract and 1 of them lets the unwanted people stay, the others don't agree. Thanks everybody, why do we have to deal with this stuff, wouldn't it be nice to have only nice people in this world Any help is appreciated, thanks.
Hi All.
I agree with Andrew about negotiation as a skill to learn and use and improve.
But reading the initial post I felt the poster was wanting to remove these illegal occupants.
In my opinion, unless matters change it's not a safe scenario for the property because :
(a) they're not on the lease, hence legally not recognised as tenants, so
(b) they're not responsible for damage or rent under the Residential Tenancies Act in NSW
(c) they have not completed a tenancy application to check on their ID, rental history or background
(d) their occupation has not been approved by PM or property owner, hence it's a sublet by the tenant if they're paying rent
to the tenant which is usually a major breach of the lease in most pre-printed NSW lease forms
(e) those with no regard for tenancy laws will likely have no regard for your property
(f) one of the legal tenants wants them out as well, so from the 2 legal tenants you'd expect support from one and compliance from the other.
I believe in negotiation, but first you have to regain control as a landlord and all occupants in the property need to understand the real situation first.
As a PM, I never negotiated with squatters or illegal occupants on principal because I couldn't legally condone illegal occupation without being negligent and liable, so I insisted they vacate and make an application, and in considering that application, I considered their recent actions as well as their merits.
Maybe that's just my style of P Management, call it unfriendly if you like, but a PM cannot afford the legal liability of playing soft hearted social worker with illegals.
What a property owner does with their own property under self-management is their own decision.