Look at keeping the penrith property and borrowing against it to invest. If you think property is a good investment consider something you can add value to. You can to get high growth if possible. Buy and hold just takes too long.
Yes it is possible for both spouses to be on the loan but one on title. It is not easy these days because of a change in the Code of Banking practice 2 years ago, but it is still possible. Easier for investment properties though.
keeping the cash in the offset accounts saves you interest but also makes that cash available for future investments too. If you paid a loan down and could not borrow any more you won’t be able to invest like you could if you hadn’t paid the loan down.
a) Tax – what if you need the money to buy a kidney or fly around the world?
You might be able to borrow, but the interest won’t be deductible.
b) risk
What if the worst happens, and you have a cash flow crisis?
c) retirement
Retirement could be delayed if your rents are not enough
d) Helping kids
What if you wanted to help one of your kids into a house – you could interest free lend them and claim the interest on your investment loans giving you great deductions and save you tax while helping them.
whats your cash flow now? Other than from work – its it actually negative?
Is that home loan all non-deductible?
could you move into an IP?
could you sell one IP, minimise CGT, keep the loan open and recycle the loan into a new investment while using the proceeds of the sale to pay off the non-deductible home loan – without closing it?
This reply was modified 3 years, 10 months ago by Terryw.
To exercise an example that may be more relevant to someone who wants to start off in buying property using company trustee trust structure. Say if the sole company director (so sole guarantor in this case) has 10 properties, and he only puts 2 properties as assets for the guarantees. In the event of company bankrupt, does it mean creditor can only chase the guaranteed 2 assets, or can creditors reach as far as the other 8 assets since they are owned by the guarantor of the company being sued?
I think you are misunderstanding the guarantee here. There are 2 types of guarantees
a) security guarantee where property A is used as security for a loan to buy property B.
b) income guarantees where a person’s income is taken into account for a loan with someone else as the borrower.
Here we are talking about income guarantees. A brand new company will not have any income of its own so the lender will rely on the director to pay its loans for serviceability reasons. If for whatever reason the company cannot pay its debt the lender will have a mortgage over the property owned by the company. This enables them to take possession of the property and sell it to recover their money. If this is not enough they will go after other assets of the company (and trust if company was acting as trustee) and/or the assets of the guarantor – they will ask the guarantor to repay the loan first though.
Is it simply a matter of “don’t try to run before you’ve learned to walk”. Where does the would-be investor start? How do they get their first Trust operating? Is it only with a personal guarantee from them initially? And then, how do they get the next one? Is it by proving their worth over time? What say you Terry?
I think you have confused things a bit Benny
A trust is not a legal entity, it is just a relationship. But for tax purposes a trust is treated as a separate entity.
So when a company borrows as trustee to buy real estate, it will be the trust the claims the interest and receives the income. The company is only the legal owner and the legal borrower – but it will have a nil tax return.
If someone wants to maximise borrowing capacity, for themselves and related entities they would generally want to
a) use a corporate trustee as the borrower, or a company in its own right as the borrower.
b) carefully consider who should be the director as this will determine who the guarantor will be in most cases. Guarantees are unavoidable
c) work with a broker to avoid using certain lenders right up front.
d) once borrowing cap reached, then set up a new company to either act in its own right or as trustee for a different trust
e) repeat.
But there is a lot more to it. Legal advice is needed on the legal issues such as whether to use a trust or a company to hold property as there are different tax, estate planning, asset protection and land tax issues. Consider the risks of guarantees and who should be the guarantor.
Consider how equity will be borrowed against – Company A cannot generally borrow against Company B’s properties. Banks won’t want to lend to Company A if Company B will be using the money either.
And I should also point out that I am not disagreeing with Steve on this either. I don’t see how what I have written conflicts with what is in his book – but I haven’t had a relook at it for several years.
I am a lawyer specialising in trusts and structuring and have 2 masters degrees, and am also a chartered tax advisor CTA, and a mortgage broker with a credit licence too. I have owned a few properties in my time too.
When a person acting as trustee borrows they are the borrower, personally liable and indemnified out of the trust assets. If things go wrong their personal assets are at risk.
When a company is acting as trustee it will be the borrower, the company personally liable for the debt and indemnified out of the trust assets. If things go wrong the company’s personal assets will be take risk – that is why company trustees generally don’t have any assets.
The shareholders cannot be liable for the company debt and even the director is not personally liable – but there can be ways they are tied in to become liable.
All this changes though when guarantees are given. Under a guarantee the guarantor is contracting to make themselves personally liable to pay the debts of the company – both personally and in its capacity as trustee, but only if the company does not, or cannot pay them. This is a contingent liability.
This means that when a company borrows, whether in its own right or as trustee, the debt is not a debt of the person.
If they go and borrow separately this is not their debt. If they set up a second company the debt of the first company is not debt of the second company – no connection, other than via the personal guarantee.
This is the issue though:
Some lenders, most lenders, tread guarantees the same as borrowings for serviceability.
That is probably just loose wording. People talk about trusts borrowing all the time, but when you dig down it is the trustee borrowing in their capacity as trustee.
seek credit advice. There are over 350 ways to increase borrowing capacity – but not all will be relevant to you, but a large number would. These include things such as reduce other debt, reduce living expenses, convert bonuses into salary, extend loan terms back to 30 years, get lower rates, use different lenders, low doc loans (without lying), guarantees, ownership structure, borrowing structure, related party loans, etc etc.
Trusts themselves won’t increase borrowing capacity, but companies can, whether as trustee or in their own right. this is because the company is the borrower and not the individual.
Its a mistake to think a ‘trust’ equates to asset protection.
It comes down to several things such as
a) terms of the trust deed
b) structure of the trustee
c) funding the trust
d) documenting things
e) transactions
As an example I have seen many people that might set up a trust, usually with an accountant, who have never read the deed. They paid the deposit on the property and then make the loan repayment on the trust’s loan.
If they went bankrupt it is easy to argue the trust does not exist, or the trustee holds the property on a resulting trust for them. So no asset protection at all.
Sometimes non-legal firms provide documents which have been drafted by a lawyer. Unless that firm itself holds professional indemnity insurance you would not be covered if things went wrong. You could not sue the lawyer either because you would only have a contract with the intermediary firm.
My company is an incorporated legal practice and covered for legal advice. I specialise in estate planning, asset protection and structuring.