Annyong Hassimnikka. (studied korean at uni, many years ago[:0])
Yes you could get the ball moving by having the bank conduct a valuation on you property now. It is no good ordering your own valuation as it is highly likely that the bank won’t accept it. This takes a week or so to do-but may take longer if the place is tenanted with uncooperative tenants that won’t allow the valuer in. Then you can get your pre approval and know what you can actually borrow.
There are various documents that need to be signed, and this could be done from o/s or you could give someone in Aust power of attorney so they can sign for you. (I purchased a couple of houses a few years ago signing for my wife-she still doesn’t knwo about them [])
Yes it is feasable, I have done something very similar myself.
You will, in effect, buying you mum’s share. So she will need a soliticor for the sale and you for the purchase. cost about $500 ea. You could do it yourself, if you know what your doing. Stamp duty would be payable basedon the value of mum’s portion. It shouldn’t take too long, but you will have to change you loan as well as the onership of the security is changing. So that is another cost and more time to arrange.
You can claim costs according to your percentage of ownership.
Yes the Govt has cracked down on this and therefore even if you trade thru a trust, the icome may have to be attributed to yourself personally. It is called the alienation of personal services income (I think), and you can probably find inof on the ATO site.
And if money is not distrubted from a discretionary trust, the income must be taxed at the top marginal rate.
But do talk to a good accountant as there may still be a way around these new rules.
1) get a 95% loan with mortgage insurance borrowed on top. This requires the least amount of upfront money. But you would need to be working about 6 months and show genuine savings for the deposit.
2) Borrow up to 80% of the value of the property with the deposit borrwed from family/friends. A loan like this is much easier to qualify for.
It will be hard for a few months, or maybe years (from recent memory!), but you will get thru it.
I don’t like to see people sell. I woulld do what Mel suggested, set up a LOC or redraw now just in case you need it to live on for a while.
Tax time is comming up soon so you may get a nice tax refund too. Maternity allowance also is about $900, and you will get some money from family payments.
If you really get into trouble, could you rent one of your bedrooms out to a student?
As a last resort you could sell, but the process could take around 3 months before you get your money.
Yes you can do it legally. There are basically 2 ways.
1) cross securitise you existing property with the new. When you sell the exisiting one, the lender will need to revalue the remaining one. If it has gone up in value and the remaining laon will be 90% of its value or less, then ok.
2) Withdraw equity from the existing loan (eg redraw, LOC etc) and use this as deposit for teh new one. When you sell the existing property you would have to repay this money as the security will not remain. So you may have to get the new one revalued as above, or find the money elsewhere.
I agree with clint, just see a mortgage broker. It is hard to answer you question without all the relevant info.
Maybe you are also asking will lenders take the $50k profit from these deals into account? Generally, probably not until you have been doing it for 2 years and can support it by tax returns. They would probably see it as a one off capital gain.
You will have to pay stamp duty on this, as well as legal fees. Also bear in mind that you will have to charge yourself market rent, and therefore after a number of years the rent will exceed the interest and the trust will be making a profit. Depending on who you distribute to, extra tax may be payable where otherwise you wouldn’t. Also you lose your PPOR CGT exemption.
SO carefully weigh up all the positives and the negatives before you do this. It may still be worth it?
I recomend using a solicitor. Conveyancors may not pick up problems with the contract, like happened to me recently. Having a solicitor saved me from entering an unacceptable contract. I am not sure, but think conveyancers just deal with changing the names on titles and other ‘paper work’.
Somebanks will take annuities into account wehn assessing your income. The trouble is you have to be able to borrow to buy the annuity in the first place. You might as well use low doc loan instead.
And SIS, I think you have mixed it up. You pay the lender a sum initially and they give it back to you monthly plus interest.
The theory goes something like this:
You have $500,000 worth of borrowable equity, you borrow this and buy a $500,000 annuity over say 5 years. You will be repaid $100,000 per year plus interest, so maybe $105,000 per year. Some lenders will accept this whole amount as income – even tho it is mostly just your own money.
Fireball, i agree with Elysium. It is not the end of the world, and may work out in the end.
In the meantime, to divert the rent to a trust (if you need to?), you could rent to a trust at a lower rent and then the trust could on rent to the tenant at a higher rent, making a little profit.
One of my tenants is currently 4 weeks behind, and I am in the process of evicting them (Vic).
I would get your PM to get onto them if they are more than 2 days late. Once they go over 14 days send them a Notice to vacate, and get your PM to go to court (VCAT in Victoria) to get a possession order. Then if they do leave the police can be authorised to kick the tenants out.
A good source of information are the various tenants unions in each state. They have websites and explain, from a tenants perspective, the process of being evicted including what a landlord can and can’t do. The tenants union Victoria can be found at: http://www.tuv.org.au/vacate.htm
I used Westpac recently for some of my properties. It cost me around $400 per property and I think they gave me a multiple property discount of around 10%. This covers building and malicious damage etc by tenant. There is also cover for loss of rent if the property is unrentable for a certain period.
I don’t think you would need contents insurance as this is covers the tenants personal items and should be their responsibility.
I am not sure what exactly you mean by assigning contracts. If you are meaning to sign and/or nominee and then substitute the purchaser for a fee, then I can’t see how there could be any question of ethics!? (BTW, this can’t be done in every state without paying double stamp duty)