Forum Replies Created
- Originally posted by queengucci:
Guys, links to define consumer… what do you think??
1. Covered under the code
http://www.creditcode.gov.au/display.asp?file=/content/credit_does_cover.htm
2. Not Covered under the code
http://www.creditcode.gov.au/display.asp?file=/content/credit_does_not_cover.htm
Hi Queen
Just look straight at the legislation, here:
http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/LEGISLTN/CURRENT/C/ConsumCredCode.pdf
Note, all states have adopted the same legislation, so even though this is QLD is should still apply.In section 6(1)b is lists when the legislation will apply:
the credit is provided or intended to be provided wholly
or predominantly for personal, domestic or household
purposes;In you case it was investment purposes. BTW, did you sign the business purpose declaration? This is further indication of whether the UCCC would apply.
Terryw
Discover Home Loans
Parramatta
[email protected]
Sign up to my mailing list.
Just send me a blank email, with “subscribe†in subject line.Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Look at this recent case
Tabone and Commissioner of Taxation [2006] AATA 466 (29 May 2006)
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/aat/2006/466.htmlIt is about owning a home using a trust
Terryw
Discover Home Loans
Parramatta
[email protected]
Sign up to my mailing list.
Just send me a blank email, with “subscribe†in subject line.Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Hi E
And don’t forget the golden rule of asset protection is not to own assets in a trading company. What would happen if your company got into trouble? Your company’s house would be at risk.
Far better off setting up a trust and have that own the house. You could also transfer the shares of the company to the trust and divert the profits into the trust which would help offset the negative gearing of the property.
There have been some tax rulings on renting from your own trust, but it does appear it can be done if you are careful.
Terryw
Discover Home Loans
Parramatta
[email protected]
Sign up to my mailing list.
Just send me a blank email, with “subscribe†in subject line.Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
That is the trouble with Adelaide Bank, they also sell their products through about 4 mortgage managers, all at potentially different rates.
If you do refinance out of one of these mortgage managers there are generally high exit fees, even on variable loans. And going back into the same funder still would result in these charges.
it seems like Queen didn’t know, or realise, because she thought it was just an increase. Being on the Adelaide forms would probably wouldn’t make you think of it as a refinancing as that was the original lender. So it is understandable that Queen wouldn’t have picked it up, unless she had read the documents carefully.
Terryw
Discover Home Loans
Parramatta
[email protected]
Sign up to my mailing list.
Just send me a blank email, with “subscribe†in subject line.Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
You could ‘buy them out’ by terminating their contract. Depending on which state you are in, they may avoid stamp duty, and you get the property back – with the need to pay stamp duty again on a new purchase, plus you get a slight discount.
Terryw
Discover Home Loans
Parramatta
[email protected]
Sign up to my mailing list.
Just send me a blank email, with “subscribe†in subject line.Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
E
Maybe a better question is “is it worthwhile doing this?”
The benefits appear to be solely in the claiming of interest.
Your company must rent the property at market rent. So each year, the rent should rise in line with the market. At first there maybe a loss, but as each year passes the loss gets less, and the tax deductions decrease.
Then after a few years there will actually be a profit to the company. ie the rent will be more than the interest and costs. This will mean your company is now paying extra tax which you could have avoided if held in your own name.
Then there is the loss of capital gains tax free status. If you sell, your company will pay tax on the gain.
Also, land tax would be payable, where it otherwise wouldn’t.
If you are going to look at doing something like this, maybe you could look at using a tax, as this will minimise the tax payable down the track.
Terryw
Discover Home Loans
Parramatta
[email protected]
Sign up to my mailing list.
Just send me a blank email, with “subscribe†in subject line.Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Originally posted by queengucci:Hey Guys
Thank you so much for your responses.
I am in WA and the broker is in another state, but i also found out today that when a broker is dealing with a consumer in another state, then the state laws of the consumer apply. Therefore WA law is applicable in this case.
The application form to draw my equity was on the same application as my refinance. Thats why I didnt pick it up.
I agree and I am cross at my bank for refinancing the same loan, for EXACTLY the same amount for EXACTLY the same properties. And then charging me $10k.. what a joke.
I made loads of phone calls today…. to the FBA who told me I had no legs to stand on and told me im an idiot for not reading all the documents. I told him that the $10,000 was not put on anything or anywhere, so how was I meant to read something that was never there.
FBA told me that its my problem and the broker had no duty to disclose anything, esp because I am a property investor. He was WRONG!
I got in touch with the Mortgage Brokers Association and the lawyer there used to be the regulator for the UCCC. He told me that ALL mortgage brokers are monitored by the UCCC. That it is a national code that all brokers must comply with in all states.
Obviously the code is only applicable to consumers. Even though I am a property investor I still fit into the consumer category because I do not have a net worth of $2Million nor do I earn $250,000 per year, if I did I would not fit the consumer definition.
According to the UCCC Mortgage Brokers must present all consumers with comparative tables and set out a schedule of all fees and charges, clearly and unambigously.
I have gone all through every piece of documentation and contract and it is outlined NOWHERE not even at settlement that $10,000 was being taken out of my equity loan. They simply dumped the funds into my account minus $10,000.
The bank and the mortgage manager are stunned, and have confirmed it is not in accordance and that refinancing was completely unnecessary. My broker still has no answers for me but to “not worry about it”.
I have sent his complaints manager a 5 page letter including all emails to confirm that he told me “Not to worry about it” and sections of the law applicable…… with a letter of demand requesting they reverse out the transation which is not that difficult considering the loan has been refinanced with the SAME bank for the SAME AMOUNT.
This broker has cost me the following unnecessary fees, that I shouldnt worry about
1. Mortgage Stampe Duty
2. $10,000 worth of break costs
3. Fixed loan for 3 years. I was planning on selling the properties early next year and will have to pay further break costs
4. 0.75% increase in interest rate on $800,000Now tell me guys, would you not worry?
Hi again
Yes, it is something to worry about. But I think you may have over looked a few things.
The UCCC does apply to all brokers, but certain loans are not covered by the UCCC, these include investment loans. SO I believe you are not covered in this case.
Stamp duty. If your loan hasn’t increased on the refinanced portion, you shouldn’t be charged stamp duty again. If you have you can probably get this back easily. Ring the Office of State Revenue of your state. Or do a web search and you can probably locate the forms.
If you were put in a 3 year fixed rate, this must have been clearly documented on the loan agreement. As with the interest rate.
Break costs. Maybe you had a fixed loan originally, and the break costs are a result of breaking this loan??? If so, these sorts of costs cannot be calculated at the time of the loan, and the amounts will depend on interest rates at the time. Other than this, I cannot think how a lender could charge you break costs or exit fees if you are not leaving them. very strange.
Let this be a warning to others – please read you loan offers etc before signing. Once you are signed up, you are generally bound.
There are ways out of a contract – unconscionable conduct by the broker, duress etc. Mere threat of legal action may be enough to force compensation.
Terryw
Discover Home Loans
Parramatta
[email protected]
Sign up to my mailing list.
Just send me a blank email, with “subscribe†in subject line.Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
There seems to be some confusion here.
An option is an agreement whereby the purchaser has the right, but not the obligation, to purchase something in the future.
eg. say Peter and Jackie’s property, the one they are looking at, is worth $1,000,000. They are not sure if they really want to buy, but think there is potential. So they offer the vendor $20,000 to sell them an option. The agreement may state that this will give them the right to purchase the property for $1mil in 6 months time.
This will give Peter and Jackie time to hold onto the property, without owning it, and wait and see if the development proposal is approved. If not approved, they can walk away, the vendor cannot force them to buy, but they would lose their $20,000. If it is approved, they can then buy the property, or they could onsell the option.
In 6 months the property may then value at $1.5mil because of the new development approval. So they have outlayed $20,000 and made $500,000 potential gain. So maybe able to just sell the option for $400,000. Whoever buys the option, will have spent $400,000, but they can then buy this $1.5mil property for $1mil = total cost $1.4mil.
The good thing about this is there is no stamp duty in some states on the purchase of an option. What is the stamp duty on buying and selling a $1mil property? = heaps! Other states have stamp duty on options, but you will still save as you would be paying stamp duty on a $20,000 option instead of a $1mil house.
The terms can vary, depending on the parties.
eg.:
-option fee, may be $1 or $1mil.
-Strike price, the price you pay for the property, can be more or less then value now, depends on your view of the market.
-The option fee may even come off the strike price
-The term, can be 1 day, 1 week, or 1 year etc
-you can put in that the option can be renewed with the paying (or not paying) of another option feeAnd you could even rent the place in the meantime, and have part of the rent to be credited against the strike price. This is what a ‘lease option’ is.
Why would a seller agree to an option? If this case, the property has been on the market for a long time. The Vendor may not have had many offers, so may accept in the hope they will buy it it 6 months. Even if they don’t he will have made $20k from the option fee.
Never draw up an option contract yourself, always use a solicitor. You wouldn’t want to come around to 6 months and find the vendor can wriggle out of the agreement.
Terryw
Discover Home Loans
Parramatta
[email protected]
Sign up to my mailing list.
Just send me a blank email, with “subscribe†in subject line.Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
What country are these in? Doesn’t sound like Australia
Terryw
Discover Home Loans
Parramatta
[email protected]
Sign up to my mailing list.
Just send me a blank email, with “subscribe†in subject line.Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Queen
The $10K was probably listed in the original loan contract, but it may have been listed as a %.
I cannot understand how a lender can charge you an exit fee when you didn’t exit.
If you want, fax all of your loan agreement to me and I will have a look at it. 1300130010.
Terryw
Discover Home Loans
Parramatta
[email protected]
Sign up to my mailing list.
Just send me a blank email, with “subscribe†in subject line.Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Hi, yes, very common. The fee is up to your negotiation skills. Generally 2% seems to be common, but it would depend on how long the option agreement is for, the agreed on purchase price etc.
Terryw
Discover Home Loans
Parramatta
[email protected]
Sign up to my mailing list.
Just send me a blank email, with “subscribe†in subject line.Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
You’ve posted twice, see my reply here:
https://www.propertyinvesting.com/forum/topic/26171.htmlTerryw
Discover Home Loans
Parramatta
[email protected]
Sign up to my mailing list.
Just send me a blank email, with “subscribe†in subject line.Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Pulling equity out = increasing your loan. So repayments will go up.
But bear in mind that you cannot generally pull out all the equity, but only up to around 80% of the new value (or 90-95% if you wish to pay LMI). So in your example, new value is $120,000. 80% of this is $96,000, less your current loan of $80,000 = 16,000 in extra equity that is accessible.
Terryw
Discover Home Loans
Parramatta
[email protected]
Sign up to my mailing list.
Just send me a blank email, with “subscribe†in subject line.Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
It really depends on how the trust is structured and the lenders policy. I have just written on this in my newsletter – send me an email if you want a copy.
Generally for asset protection reasons, you want to keep guarantees to a minimum. However, sometimes you may want to or need to include a partner for servicing reasons – your income alone may not be enough to get the loan through.
To give you flexibility, be careful with the wording of your trust deed. If you don’t need your wife’s income to service, it may be better not to name her at all on the trust deed at all.
Some lenders want a guarantee from all adult beneficiaries named on the deed. So I would consider having neither your wife nor your son named at all on the deed. Each will still be a beneficiary, coming under a general beneficiary category due to their relationship to the trustee. No need to name them.
Your wife still may be able to guarantee the loan if necessary, but not naming her will mean you can also leave her out, and preserve her borrowing capacity for next time.
Terryw
Discover Home Loans
Parramatta
[email protected]
Sign up to my mailing list.
Just send me a blank email, with “subscribe†in subject line.Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Not only will he receive the trailing commission, but an upfront commission as well!
But I have never heard of someone being refinanced into the same lender.
Terryw
Discover Home Loans
Parramatta
[email protected]
Sign up to my mailing list.
Just send me a blank email, with “subscribe†in subject line.Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
You can only claim one property as your main residence. So moving into the IP will mean if will be tax free that the period you live there, but at the same time, your home may be CGT liable for the period you didn’t live in it.
Terryw
Discover Home Loans
Parramatta
[email protected]
Sign up to my mailing list.
Just send me a blank email, with “subscribe†in subject line.Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Hi
So you are going to move out and rent the property? In that case you will probably want to keep your loan high, and also save interest at the same time. Therefore, you should look at the merits of taking an interest only loan with a 100% offset account.
Terryw
Discover Home Loans
Parramatta
[email protected]
Sign up to my mailing list.
Just send me a blank email, with “subscribe†in subject line.Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Why not see a second broker for a different opinion
Terryw
Discover Home Loans
Parramatta
[email protected]
Sign up to my mailing list.
Just send me a blank email, with “subscribe†in subject line.Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
In that case, probably an accountant would be more suitable than a FP.
Terryw
Discover Home Loans
Parramatta
[email protected]
Sign up to my mailing list.
Just send me a blank email, with “subscribe†in subject line.Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
a business is not a separate legal entity, so they cannot own property. The only options for owning property are via a personal name or a company, or either as trustee for a trust.
A Trust is well worth looking at.
Transfering properties over to a company or trust will result in stamp duty, and possibly CGT.
Terryw
Discover Home Loans
Parramatta
[email protected]
Sign up to my mailing list.
Just send me a blank email, with “subscribe†in subject line.Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au