Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 841 through 860 (of 16,319 total)
  • Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    It means if you are the owner and mortgage the property you promise, as mortgagor under the mortgage agreement, must prevent people from lodging caveats. If someone lodges you must do all you can to have the caveat removed.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    With a company new investors can be introduced by transferring shares without triggering stamp duty in most cases, so it is more flexible in this regard.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Banks generally won’t like to take income from property renovation into account for servicing. Property sales are considered one offs and even if they would take it into account you will need 2 full years tax returns with the majority of lenders.

    A way around this may be to set up a company to do the projects. If your intention is profit making then there would be no main residence CGT exemption anyway and the profit would be taxed as income and not capital gains so no 50% discount. The company can pay dividends which transforms the income so the lender will not necessarily know it is coming from property – just don’t use the word ‘development’ in the company name.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Beware – lots of confusing comments in this section.

    1. Don’t draw it down. If you borrow to pay off the main residence loan the interest won’t be deductible and your $120k split will be a mixed purpose loan.

    2. With extreme care. If you pay for something with cash and then take money from the loan the interest will not be deductible because you have just borrowed to reimburse yourself. Mixed loan issues too,

    You need to pay the vendor directly from your loan account – which may be difficult.
    An alternative is to use a credit card to borrow to pay for the items and then refinance this loan with the bank loan. You must not have any other private expenses on the card when doing this – or the card will be a mixed purpose loan.

    3. Bloody oath. Have you sought tax advice? Property first used to produce income could reset the cost base to market value at the date it first earns income.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    I have posted a new thread of a few ways a trust can help improve borrowing capacity. see https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/5031860-trust-strategies-to-increase-borrowing-capacity/

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    With serviceability it is not a matter of which lender, but the situation and the structure.

    Land tax is too complicated to list the differences across all states. Even comparing 2 states is complex.
    In QLD each trust could get a separate threshold of $350,000. Same with companies.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Ethan

    Trusts can actually increase serviceability in many instances.
    Trusts can negative gear just like a person can
    Land tax on the first dollar is only for land in NSW. In QLD a trust owning land gets a separate threshold for example.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    The answer to most who ask me should they use a trust to own property is ‘probably not’.

    The risk of being sued is overstated by spruikers who try to make money out of selling trusts – most of them unqualified too.

    Tenants can and do sue, but it is very rare. I have been investing in property for over 20 years and no tenant has ever attempted to sue me – except perhaps in the tribunal over minor lease disputes. But hold a property in a trust won’t protect the property because they will sue the owner of the property which will be the trustee. Trustee is indemnified out of the trust assets so all the assets of that trust will be at risk – but your personal assets may be at risk.

    I think the great danger would come from if you are in business. There are always disputes in business so this can be very risky. But I have been self employed for about 15 years and never been sued. I have had some disputes, but never that serious. But I have sued a client in court myself. That is risky potentially as if you lose you could be up for costs.

    I advise on asset protection a fair bit yet I have only seen about 5 or so people end up bankrupt. So it is pretty rare.

    Keep in mind that there are other ways to ‘protect’ assets without those assets being held in trust.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Benny

    DIfferent lawys for land tax to income tax. A property could be a main residence for CGT purposes yet not a PPOR for land tax purposes, and vice versa,

    In NSW for example it is much harder to get the PPOR land tax exemption for a property you have moved out than it is for CGT.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Yes valuers actually can tell you what it would have been worth at any point in time.

    It could also be exempt from CGT for up to 6 years.

    Benny – there is no declaring of which property will be the main residence – until the sale of one of them.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    You could do 3 things
    1. Nothing, but work on getting a borrowing capacity.
    2. Lend some of the money to someone who does have a borrowing capacity
    3. joint ownership with someone who does have a capacity – whether direct, via a company or trust structure

    But get legal advice before considering 2 or 3.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Why look at creating a trust?
    Why pay PI on an investment property?

    I think you should do some more reading.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    One of my clients has purchased 2 psotive cashflow properties in innner Sydney. One doubled in value within a few years and was cashflow positive from day 1.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    This is legal advice so best to speak to a lawyer as it relates to state taxes.

    See s 12 Land Tax Act
    http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/sa/consol_act/lta193690/s12.html

    12—Tax in cases where there are two or more owners

    (1) Subject to subsection (2)

    , where two or more persons are the owners of land, the same amount of land tax is payable in respect of that land as if only one person were the owner.

    (2) Subsection (1)

    does not affect the operation of any provisions of this Act under which the value of land is aggregated, for the purpose of the assessment of tax, with the value of other land.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    You would generally want to pay off non deductible debt and reborrow to invest. This way you are increasing tax deductions.

    But if you intend to move out of the current main residence you may not want to do this.

    One strategy, of many, is to buy the future main residence now using a 105% loan, rent it out gain some tax advantages and then after a few years move in. In the meant time you would store your cash in offsets on the current main residence loan. You ideally don’t want to use any of your cash to invest as that you cost you in the future when you do move into the new main residence. It seems you may have excess funds more than the outstanding loan atm so this will be tricky.

    It might be better to upgrade the main residence now.

    Speak to a lawyer and tax planner before doing anything as there are heaps of strategies – another is a post death testamentary trust.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Hi Tony

    I don’t take inflation into account because working in todays dollars should be enough as long as the property and rent growth is the same or more than the inflation the passive income goal should match todays dollars – or be better.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Why not just get a second valuation, and a 3rd perhaps. You could agree that the price paid to the other party is the average of the 3.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Work it out like this
    1 estimate the yield of the types of property you are after
    2. reduce this by about 1% for costs
    3. Divide the desired income by the figure in 2

    In this case assuming you get a 5% yield, take this as 4% after costs
    $250,000 divided by 4% =$6,250,000

    So you will need $6,250,000 worth of unencumbered property to get an income of $250,000 per year (before tax).

    Now work out the average value of the property you are looking to get. lets say $500,000 properties
    $6,250,000 divided by 500,000 = 12.5

    So you will need around 13 properties valued at $500,000 (in todays dollars) all fully paid off to retire.

    Of this may be 26 properties with 50% LVR loans perhaps.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    I guess it gives you more flexibility to move lenders. But other than that not really.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Uncrossing is good, but it won’t help you pay off a loan any earlier.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

Viewing 20 posts - 841 through 860 (of 16,319 total)