Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 501 through 520 (of 16,319 total)
  • Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Great Podcast Ziv – just listened to it.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    It won’t be easy for them to get finance if they are borrowing the deposit, but they would need at least 20% to avoid having LMI involved with their stricter policies.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Hi Moresh

    “We assist property developers in setting up the legal structures”

    This is legal advice so you would need to be lawyers to do this.

    Stamp duty could be eliminated completely if certain conditions are met – or dramatically reduced.
    No investors wouldn’t become liable for the debts of the developer.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Is the company an incorporated legal practice?

    Have you considered ways to reduce CGT and stamp duty on a member wanting to take up ownership of a property?

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    You could keep the mortgage but pay out the loan and redraw and invest at owner occupied rates. Don’t use cash from the offset to directly invest as the resulting interest will not be deductible.

    Seek tax advice

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Hi Luke

    That sure is cheap rent for a property worth so much. It must be under 2% yield.
    That is something well worth taking advantage of, but you could still utilise the main residence exemption on another property.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    If it is structure advice you are after this is legal advice. Financial advisers will have no idea – yet often still advise on this poorly.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    I have done rentvesting in the past, but generally don’t recommend it.

    Although you will be saving cash at the moment over time rents rise whereas those paying off of home loan would find the monthly repayments generally remain the same over 30 years. Use of an offset account and paying extra can knock this 30 years down to 10. It might actually work out cheaper in repayments about the 5 year mark – that is with rent rises the rents paid would exceed the repayments on a home loan at this point.

    Once the main residence is paid off it can help serviceability as you are not paying anything for your living quarters – for a serviceability point of view.

    Interest on a main residence is generally at a lower rate than an investment property. Careful planning can allow you to get main residence rates on money borrowed from investment properties.

    Land tax is another issue – by not living in one of your properties it may be subject to land tax.

    The biggie is CGT though. Not having a main residence CGT exemption is a huge disadvantage.

    However, the best strategy is to rentvest temporarily by using a few strategies together.
    Find the dream home.
    Move into it, establish it as the main residence.
    Move our and rent the home out.
    Claim all associated costs and negative gear it.
    Rent where somewhere to live for up to 6 years.
    Keep saving in the offset account attached to the loan on the main residence

    Once you think the main residence will have a positive taxable income then you move back in.
    Pay down the loan, redraw to invest at owner occupied rates.
    Keep paying down the non0-deductible loan splits

    Advantage
    – full CGT exemption
    – Full land tax exemption
    – owner occupied rates on at least part of your investment loans
    – non-deductible debt being quickly paid off
    – servicing improves
    – taxable income lower as not paying tax on rental income

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    They lender may alternatively want to control the payment of the funds. So you could be approved without access to the funds until the point when you find a property and have entered the contract of sale. The new property may not be used as security but they will want to make sure the funds are used for this.

    Cash out over about $50k is a problem these days

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Get some proper advice because you will not be able to claim depreciation on fixtures and fittings unless the property is new. As you will be living in it the property will not be new when you rent it out. Possibly $18k less deductions as a result.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    If that was the case she would still have benefited by receiving rent – which would presumably be above market.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    You will need some complex and expensive legal advice.

    The trust will be a controlled foreign trust.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Borrow against Australian property for the purchase?

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Here is the link to that thread I mentioned

    https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/5031860-trust-strategies-to-increase-borrowing-capacity/

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Yes it could make a huge difference. I started a thread on here about 6 months ago about this exact thing.

    Keep in mind any transfer would be a CGT event and a dutiable transaction.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Yes, but..

    But you are conflating a ‘loan’ with a ‘mortgage’ when they are two separate things. A mortgage is a charge over a property to act as security for a loan. Since there are 2 owners there must be 2 mortgagors because banks will not let their loans be secured by part of a property.

    So to get the loan into 1 name, and secured by the property, the bank will require the other person to be on the mortgage and to guarantee the loan. Because if you don’t pay they will have to pay this does not really change serviceability at all.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    First check that they are licensed to give tax advice or not. Only lawyers or tax agents can give tax advice. Financial planners cannot give tax advice unless they are either a lawyer with a practicing certificate of a registered tax agent – some are.

    If they are not licensed then don’t consider them any further. If they are then investigate further.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    No it can’t be said over every property. With some the plan is to invest long term and receive rents.

    Legislation doesn’t have a minimum, but the time factor would be relevant to determine if it was the main residence.

    There is no 6 month rule. One week could be sufficient in some cases.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Could the lesser performer become the greater performer in the years ahead?

    Loans must be secured against property, unless they are personal loans?

    Which would release more funds after repayment of the loan and CGT?

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    You could always start at 80% and increase later – but harder to cash out later.

    You don’t want to incur LMI unnecessarily. What if it takes you a full 12 months to buy the 4 properties? There could be growth in the meantime, which might have meant less LMI if you had waited.

    Also there is a question about the deductibility of LMI when you are incurring too soon compared to the investing.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

Viewing 20 posts - 501 through 520 (of 16,319 total)