Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 4,621 through 4,640 (of 16,319 total)
  • Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Best to pay off non deductible debt first as this will save you tax.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213
    booge wrote:
    The IP is purely in my name from before i met my wife. Haven't refinanced yet, meeting with Mortgage broker next

    I am concerned by this comment. What do you mean – are you talking about adding the wife to title? Mortgage brokers cannot give tax or legal advice and I would be concerned about deductibility of loans if you do transfer and get this wrong. eg If you transfer for no consideration will her half of the loan be deductible?

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Banks are in the business of lending. As long as you qualify why wouldn't they lend?

    You will be using equity, but it won't be used as security for the new property. The PPOR will be used as security.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    You would be liable for all expenses up to the end of your lease or until they find a new person to replace you.

    But, the agent also has a duty to minimise costs – they shouldn't leave the property empty just to extract money out of you.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Don't use the offset straight off for the deposit as the interest on your PPOR will increase and this won't be claimable.

    Setting it up like your broker suggests will save you tax and keep the properties from being cross collateralised.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Morts, not sure where the fraud and negligence came into it.

    With a negligence case you would, if lost, have a judgment awarded against you. This is what we are protecting against – bankruptcy. If you don't pay a judgment debt there are a few things that can happen and all of them involve the seizure of your property. If you don't have enough propety then you would generally be bankrupted. This is where the trustee in bankruptcy can look at past transactions and commence legal action against wife etc who owe you money or hold assets on trust for you.

    Fraud is a criminal act so you could face gaol as well as civil actions to return the money etc. There is also the proceeds of crime legislation which enables police to seize property which was purchased with money made from crimes. So same as above but worse.

    I think it would not be possible to will an asset to a SMSF for a few reasons. SMSFs are there to provide for the retirement of the members – this is the sole reason. So if the member dies who are you providing retirement benefits for – death is teh ultimate retirement. You would be crediting the account of a surviving member – and this would be a contribution. So you would have to meet all the contribution cap rules etc. A residential house would also be against the rules too, but you would be a related party.

    The testamentary trust would work well and may even assist if you were to later remarry and then divorice. But only slightly. If would assist your children more if they were to later marry and divorce (because the assets of the trust would not have been built up by their efforts).

    There is also extra ta benefits- children can receive income from a TT at dult rates meaning approx $16,000 per year each. This becomes $20,542 from next year. That is huge. Imagine if you rented the house out in the future and had 2 kids – your family could receive $40,000 pa in rental income tax free.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    It could be claimed that your wife owns your share of the house, ie 50%, as trustee for you. A court could deem, or construe, that a trust is in place even though you may not have a formal arrangement or agreement in place. This would be a constructive trust. Probably won't happen unless you are looking at big claims and there is big equity. There is a case in which a barrister went bankrupt and the ATO got half his house – FCT v Cummins.

    People generally don't lke to consider death, but all you asset protection methods could be thrown out the window if your wife would leave you the property in her will. Imagine your business fails because the wife has an illness and you are looking after her. You are sued and a judgment is entered against you, You are then bankrupted, but soon inherit the house.

    Testamentary trusts also has some amazing tax benefits for kids under 18.

    You could leave an asset to a SMSF as it is just a trust – but there would probably be some adverse taxation consequences. I hadnt considered this before.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    It would also show up of the credit report of the individual who is guaranteeing the loan.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213
    morts wrote:
    Our PPoR is in my wife's name (beacuse I run a buisness)

    This is a good idea, but it doesn't necessarily mean your property is safe if you are sued. Have you contributed to the repayment of the loan on this property or made other non financial contributions?

    Does you wife have a valid will set up with a testamentary discretionary trust in place?

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Your broker is right.

    You accountant is wrong. Or, I should say you cannot redraw the money and use it for the new property because the new property will be a personal expense.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    There is a difference between boarders and renters – boarders just pay their share of costs, not for the room. Renters pay for the room.

    In this I think the intent is to claim expenses so they would need to be renters.

    I think you should seriously consider not doing this, ie claiming it, as the small tax savings now could be large tax losses later when you sell.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    You could check the Duties Act (VIC)
     

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    I agree with Richard – it will have no effect.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    In Australia your income from a SMSF would be tax exempt once you have reached retirement age. But the laws of USA are different and your entity over there would be, probably, taxed.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Asset protection = company because of the limited liability.

    If the trustee is sued the trust assets will be at risk, if these are not enough to satisfy any judgment then the personal assets of the trustee will be at risk.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Since you have a business in a trust already you could look at a new discretionary trust. If there are any losses then the business trust could distribute to the new trust to offset these losses and this may reduce your personal taxable income. You need to be careful when doing this – especially with vesting dates of the trust. So seek advice.

    You would also be aware that using a trust may result in more land tax being payable – especially in NSW as the trust gets no tax free threshold so you may pay aprox 1.6% pa extra.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    hi IP

    The parents could leave the asset to the discretionary trust. Not sure about hte SMSF though.

    But, it may be better to change the will to a testamentary discretionary trust for the added tax benefits s102AG – but these would probably acrue to the intervivos testamentary trust too, but it would be a hassle to keep the income separate. s102AG allows children to receive income from a will or estate and get adult tax rates.

    Watch out for land tax/CGT if the property is going to be a main residence and going into a Testy trust.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Just do a google and you will find heaps.

    Then try http://www.trustmagic.com.au

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Not really. You will end up paying more tax as companies are charged a flat rate of 30%. Also no 50% CGT discount available.

    Look at discretionary trusts instead.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    You would hve to apply to have the guarantor released.

    And, if go for a new property then you can pay LMI so you won't need a new guarantor.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

Viewing 20 posts - 4,621 through 4,640 (of 16,319 total)