Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 4,501 through 4,520 (of 16,319 total)
  • Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213
    Tinsel777 wrote:
    Hope this answers one of your questions regarding constitutional law ruling over all.

    In September 5th 2006 the Case of – Forge versus Australian Securities and Investments – all seven High Court Judges stated unanimously that the Constitution reigns supreme.

    Thanks for the reference, but I didn't ask such a question. 

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Also please give an example of common law over ruling legislation

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Sorry to have offended you but it just doesn’t make sense. All lawyers study constitutional law as a compulsory subject so I have studied it in depth but it is not an area I am interested in

    If there were state laws contradicting the constitution then they would be invalid and they would quickly be challenged in the high court.

    Leaving the comments regarding the murders aside for a min Specifically which section of the constitution would prevent variable interest rates?

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213
    mcgrandles wrote:
    hi have a person interested in my house but has not put in an offer but has asked for a contract of sale to be sent to him then he will make an offer after his solicitor has gone through it im very confused ? i thought you had an offer first then if you accept that offer contracts are then drawn if i do contract first what cost is involved ? and at what risk   

    How can the potential buyer accept your offer to sell the house when they don't know the terms.

    Also, in NSW at least, a property cannot be marketed by an agent unless a contract of sale has already been prepared.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    That is the most ridiculous thing I have read in the past hour!

    Legislation takes precedent over common law and the HIgh Court is the only court that has jurisdiction to hear constitutional matters.

    Who would be making the death threats? What recent murders could be linked to keeping the status quo? Do you think the reservice bank has a hit squad or that the CBA employs assassins to take out those who refuse to fix their loans? of course not, they would be contractors so that they do not have to pay the superannuation guarantee surcharge!

    Next you will be telling us the 9/11 attacks were organised by Israel and the CIA? Or that Pharlap is still alive and living in Tibet under a false name.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    I am a lawyer so am intereste in your views.

    On what basis can banks charging variable interest rates illegal? If this is the case why hasn't someone mounted a challenge? I recall something in the  media about it a few years ago now but never looked into it.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Hi Tinsell

    I am not saying you definitely need a licence but look into the laws of the State you will want to act in first. You may need a real estate licence or a buyer's agent licence.

    No sure how the 'free people' bit fits in either. The laws are there to, allegedly protect the people and maintain standards. You could imagine how it would be if anyone could act as a real estate agent without being licenced (they are dodgy enough as it is).

    And why would it be unconstitutional?

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Are you licensed to charge a finders fee?

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213
    jasedc5r wrote:

    I was wondering if I would still be able to finance under my name and purchase the property under a family trust?
    If this is possible, what problems will I have with tax claims?

     

    Remember the trust is not a legal entity. It will be the trustee that is owning the property not the trust. So it should be the trustee borrowing the money in their capacity as trustee.

    If you borrow in your name an you are not the trustee then it could be deemed that you are onlending the money to the trust. If you did that then the interest on that loan would not be deductible.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Hope you are not trying to set everything up on your own.

    Read this recent interesting case
     Aston (Aust) Properties Pty Ltd & Ors v Commissioner of State Revenue (Taxation) [ 2012] VCAT 48  (9 January 2012)
    http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/vic/VCAT/2012/48.html?stem=0&synonyms=0&query=title%28%222012%20VCAT%2048%22%29

    11 Trustee companies and 67 trusts owning real property – but he stuffed up and the trusts were not valid.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Move in for a while and then rent it. Benefit could include:
    – less stamp duty
    – FHOG
    – CGT exemption
    – All the income tax deductions too (after renting)

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    I think it is generally best to own the main residence in the name of the person who is less likely to be sued. This is often the wife, but not always.

    Then for investments in growth assets such as property you need to weigh up land tax and other negatives and then if you do go ahead a use one then set this up under a company as trustee for a discretionary trust with the risk taker in control as director. Sometimes the ship sinks and sometimes the captain goes down too. The safe person also need to avoid giving personal guarantees.

    Sometimes there is a toss up between staying very safe and/or moving forward. eg the risk taker may use up their borrowing capacity. If that is the case then best to form a new trust with the safe person in control to maintain some separation.

    Selling your house and renting for a while is another matter. I think you should does some calculations and see how it goes. If you do decide to do it then you could group and plan the purchase of the new main residence in the future an some asset protection strategies for this.

    Also consider moving in to a new house and then out again and take advantage of the benefits of claiming all expenses and still maintaining the house CGT free for up to 6 years.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Transferring the house into your name will result in stamp duty in NSW. This will be assessed on the value of the transferred amount at market value.

    This won't result in much asset protection at all. Have a look at the Bankruptcy Act sections 120 and 121. If you transfer it without consideration for asset protection purposes it can be clawed back indefinitely. If you transfer it for full market value with money changing hands then it could be 5.5 years depending on the circumstances.

    You would be crazy to sell and rent in my opinion. Your main residence will be the only CGT free asset you can get so why not have one. You will also be paying rent where you otherwise wouldn't.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Nope. See your lawyer

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    I don't want to give you legal advice as I know nothing about easements. Run it by your solicitor.

    With regards to 3 the developer would just be a company which will cease to exist once this project is completed. So this is unlikely to be effective even if they agree.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    You could probably try for some form of compensation. But legals could be costly if it goes to court.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    You won't have a contract until the point of exchange. Before that time you could have an oral agreement but it wouldn't be binding. This means they could sell to someone else, even if you have put down a 'holding deposit'.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    It could be tresspassing.

    Was there an easement recorded?

    What did your solicitor say?

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    There is nothing illegal about working on the property before settlement, but this carries a bit of risk as if the property doesn't settle then you may have wasted your time and money.

    Subject to finance clauses are pretty rare in NSW. Usually people just extend the cooling off period to 10 days so they can get finance organsed. You could do it subject to valuation but you would need to be specific.

    Vendor finance wouldn't work if the vendor has finance on the property as they would have to discharge the mortgage. They could probably give you early possession with you paying in installments with title in the vendor's name. Or you could borrow a deposit off them – say pay 80% now an the remainder in x years. But a bank is unlikely to want to lend to you if this is in place.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Mr T.

    What do you mean by point 2?

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

Viewing 20 posts - 4,501 through 4,520 (of 16,319 total)