Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 4,161 through 4,180 (of 16,319 total)
  • Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    first thingis to seek legal advice on if it is possible to terminate the contract or rescind. unlikely but it cold be possible. extremely unlikely that the would be finance clauses or other conditions which have not been met.
    econdly talk to a broker and see what you can do.t
    hen consider what will happenif yf
    ou cannot settle. you will lose your deposit and could be sued for much more.

    s

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    probably difficult and costly to borrow that high and the extra will not bedeductible

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    i am now in thailand with onlymy tablet and am still having dramas posting on this site- but not otherss

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    rhi pg
    t is good to have different views on things.
    still recomend trusts over companies for investing . i would even advise against using a trust for reasons outlined above. but it is up to the client which way they go and a company could work out better for some limited circumstances.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    ray i think u are confusing fixing with splitg. these are separate issues

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Amsaimi I think you may be conflating two separate issues.

    The first is borrowing to pay general expenses. This should be ok

    The second is borrowing to pay interest. This is capitalising interest and is also generally ok. But the Ato has said it is not ok if you are doing it as a scheme to pay offf your non deductible loans sooner.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Sounds like your accountant is not on the ball.

    It is not the loan that matters but the % ownership on the title of the proeprty. So you need to work out the cashflow position of hte property you will buy and then how long before it becomes tax positive – ie turning a profit after all expenses.

    Then you need to decide to take the short term benefits of claiming more now and then paying more tax later or vice versa.

    Good idea not to use your savings. Don't use redraw either. best to set up a separate loan on your PPOR and borrow the costs and deposit from this and keep all your cash for the non deductible debt.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    I am a solicitor based in Sydney CBD and have purchased a few properties of my own over the years, and sold.

    None of my law clients have ever asked me if I am an investor or not. I don't know if it really matters too much, especially in regards to adding clauses to a contract.

    I am overseas in japan at the moment so amd not available for any conveyancing work but will be back in a few weeks.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    What names are you putting it in and will there be a loan involved?

    You putting in a large amount in cash is certainly worth more, plus you are doing the hard work.

    Make sure you get the legal work done and try to think of everything bad that could happen. eg. death or sudden lack of capacity.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    I assume that the granny flat is on the same title as the house? If so both tenants will need to buy the wholre property jointly. Or maybe you are approaching each separately about buying the whole place??

    1. A contract for the sale of land.
    2. They would have already entered into an agreement to buy and exchanged contracts. If they did not follow through and settle then they may lose what they have put in. But this could be challenged in a court as it may be inequitable.
    3. Maybe
    4. The biggest thing that can go wrong is that they stop paying you and you have to 'evict'.
    5. Maybe work out some figures and then go to see them.
    6. yes
    7. Possibly means they are on a low income which may mean you need to assess whether they can afford to buy the property.

    Also you must think about how much you are potentially losing. What if the property increases in value. You won't benefit but the tenants will so you are essentially giving up future capital gains to save some minor expenses now.

    You also have to look at if you need a credit licence to be able to offer credit.

    Might also want to consider a lease option.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    There is no basis for that claim by the ATO. That is wrong advice and you shouldn't rely on it.

    If you want to ask the ATO a question you have to do it formally and ask for a private binding ruling.

    I bet if you ring again you would get different answers.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Taking money out of a redraw is considered new borrowings. So I agree with amie.

    Only the interest on the $15k would be deductible.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    lend her some money? or encourage her to pay more than the interest each month. if she cannot efford to then she will have to sell eventually

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Yes, tax is much different

    Children can only earn a few hundred from passive income before they get hit with penalty tax.
    Children can get access to adult rates if they are physically working however.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    You misunderstand 'beneficiary' of a trust. No work involved at all for a child.

    If your company wants to employ one of your children then that is a separate issue. You have to watch out for employing under 18s.
    If you and wife both work for the same company then it is the company that employs people. If you work in separate companies then either or both (or neither) companies can employ them. Remember if a child is earning money then there are tax issues.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    No, I was assuming the children were not working. But they could be employed by the business company.

    I was referring to them being beneficiaries of the trust that owned the property. (a company should not own property because of tax reasons).

    Incidently if both you and your wife owned a house each and used them as the main residence then only one would get the CGT exemption.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    A business is just a concept not a legal entity or a structure. Only a legal person can own a property.

    So you would have a company or an individual own the property. The company or individual could be owner as trustee or in their own right.

    You would generally not run any business from the same company or in your own name, for asset protection reasons. So you would have one property owned by a company as trustee (probably). The children would be beneficiaries of the trust. You would then need to consider the terms of the trust to see if a beneficiary can use trust property and if so do they have to pay rent or could they live there free.

    If they don't pay market rent and there is a loan on the property then the trust won't be able to claim tax deductions in full.

    There may be also fringe benefit tax issues.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    You have to look at the terms of your contract.

    Generally they cannot pull out. But if you have breached some terms then they may have a way out.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Great strategy if you have the cashflow to support it.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Check with your tax advisor.

    But, as long as your are payng the interest each month then you should be able to keep borrowing to pay investment expenses. Put all rents and incomes in the offset on your home loan and only start to pay down the investment loans after you have no more non deductible expenses.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

Viewing 20 posts - 4,161 through 4,180 (of 16,319 total)