Forum Replies Created
If its an investment loan and you have private non deductible debt then it is more beneficiarial to keep paying down the personal debt first – hence IO on the investment to free up cash.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Did you have another residence at the same time as this one?
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
I plan to spend every last cent and then get the pension at age 67.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Thats ok, thanks for the info.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
In NSW only someone with an equitable interest in the property (land) can lodge a caveat. It can't be lodged for a debt unless you have let the lodger charge your property – such as some builders and lawyers do by including clauses in their contracts.
From what I know so far, which is little, I can't see how this would work because it seems like a scheme designed to defeat creditors.
But it could have the shock effect so someone doing some checks before going to court may just stop there.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Thanks Kate
Doesn't really make sense to me.
The trust may have an interest in the property but what happens if the property grows in value.
eg.
$100,000 property
$80,000 loan with Bank west
$20,000 interest via the trust having an equitable claim – not sure what
You may be able to say the person owns 80% and the trust 20%After 10 years,
$200,000 propertyPerson 'owns' $160,000 less the $80,000 = $80,000
Trust 'owns' $40,000If person goes bankrupt the trustee in bankruptcy will come in and take over the property (standing in the shoes of the person). The trust may have its position secured by registering its interest which may be a higher interest than the creditors. Bank will be first in line.
But the $80,000 equity will be exposed and when the trustee in bankruptcy sells the property this (minus there $79,000 fees) will go to creditors.
Also for that to be effective the trust would have to do something for its interest, such as injecting money.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Kate
What do you mean by "The trust that goes on the caveat"?
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Austlii is the most common website used by lawyers to check legislation. It may not be 100% as up to date as the commonwealth Govt one but it is much easier to use.
In this instance it is up to date and contains the same wording as the one you linked to, which wasn't the actual Regulation, but the update to it.
Now I get what you are saying: Govt is unjustly excluding "break fees" from the definition of "exit fees".
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Michael.Lee wrote:Gidday gibbo1,Also note my post linked to the actual current legislation SLI 2011 No. 40 rather than the resource linked by Terryw which carries an all care, no responsibility disclaimer.
You can also view the complaint to the Commonwealth Ombudsman on Exit Fees here which I encourage you to do if you would like to research the issue and respond more thoughtfully.
Thanks,
Michael
Michael (Gidday)
I am not sure what you mean by this.
SLI 2011 No. 40 amends Regulation 79A of the
NATIONAL CONSUMER CREDIT PROTECTION REGULATIONS 2010
Reg 79A can be found at http://corrigan.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_reg/nccpr2010486/s79a.html
This regulation prohibits exit fees. But it does not apply to break fees for fixed loans.
A break fee is defined at Reg 79A(3) as
break fee means a credit fee or charge that relates:
(a) only to the early repayment of an amount provided under a credit contract for a fixed rate loan; and
(b) only to the portion of the loan that is fixed; and
(c) to the part of the credit provider's loss, arising from the early repayment, that is a result of differences in interest rates.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Hi
Refinancing won't affect deductibility, increasing the loan won't either unless the extra borrowed is invested.
New tax free thresholds mean you can each earn about $20,400 next financial year and pay no tax.
Can't comment on the proposed fraud aspects!
Look at the 6 year rule under s118-145 ITAA 97 which will allow you to rent out the property without losing the CGT exemption – in some circumstances.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Nope, never heard of that ruling.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Nooob wrote:Catt
Thanks for your generous offer.
To summarize my question (and reduce the hassle for you to read it)
I only need a structure to tell me for example:
First property $X / PPOR, IO
2nd $Y / IP, IO
3rd $Z / IP, IO
Wait ? months for buffer, redraw equity from X and buy another IP then sell Y to release credit for 2 more etc.Long story short; Need a strategy and a structure to follow and down the track as I'm getting smarter I will be able to modify it my self or talk to the same person to modify it for me base on the performance of each IP.
Thanks again, I really appreciate that you guys care enough to read my posts
Sounds like a mortgage broker is needed to me.
They can help you plan for planning how much you can afford to borrow and when. Its then up to you to decide on what sort of property and where.
Stay clear of someone trying to sell you their properties, but if you need help then maybe a buyers agent is needed.
Considering other aspects is also needed so you need a lawyer to assist with what names (I think you mentioned no possibility of a spouse though?) and estate planning – pre and post death. Lawyer and/or accountant may be able to advise on land tax and structures such as trusts etc But probably down the track a bit more
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
I agree with Richard
You might want to look at the Duties Act WA to see if there are any stamp duty exemptions, but I don't think there are unless transferring from one name to both names for a main residence.
Even though it is costly it may work out cheaper for you to sell and then reborrow to buy a new investment property down the track – after paying for the new main residence.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
The ostrich method is very common. It is an interesting phenomenon.
Did they answer the administrator's request by listing all their assets and liabilities? I hope not.
Please let us know how they go. Might take many months but I am sure that the Administrator will come after them if they have assets – it generates more fees for the administrator.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
They should see a lawyer as there is a high chance they will be sued for the $250,000 shortfall. This could be increased a lot by the addition of legal fees etc.
Bankruptcy is a high possibility so they should prepare asap.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
http://jade.barnet.com.au/Jade.html#article=261412
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Oh no. Don't want to alarm you or them but look at
South Sky Investments Pty Ltd v Luppi [2012] QSC 27
http://jade.barnet.com.au/Jade.html#sy=261412
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Wow, not good.
Which state was the OTP in?
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Depends. Are the owners the same for each? Did each occur in the same financial year? If so and htey are both on capital account then any losses could be used to offset gains.
But it could be something to do with forfeiting the deposit on the OTP one. Not sure.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
You could allow them to have a finance clause and hten an addition clause that either party could back out before the finance is granted.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au