Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 3,701 through 3,720 (of 16,319 total)
  • Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    And the original loan interest would generally be deductible – but only on the lowest loan balance. So if the loan reduced lower than $300,000 and you topped it off with redraw then the interest on this second part would not be deductible

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Tom, no need for the " " as that is exactly what can happen in VIC. Sell to a spouse for full market value with no stamp duty!!

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    It is interesting because agents doesn't usually get paid their commission until settlement.

    Freddie, how did you find this property and was it marketed this way from the start?

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    You could have structured things more tax effective. Are you living in the first home?

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213
    therock1 wrote:

    However, as far as protecting these new assets i am after i as thinking of buying them thru a unit trust so the ex- cant come back and have another crack at me after a couple of yrs.

    Any thoughts?

    This will offer virtually no asset protection at all.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213
    M.Investigator wrote:
    I read that Mark Rolton is one of the most respected real estate educators in Australia. He is very empowering and has the same real estate understanding as the successful property moguls, Donald Trump and Robert Kiyosaki.  It will be interesting to come across this mentor.

    Where did you read that???

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    possibly

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213
    JacM wrote:
      This is because if you personally get sued for something, then the SMSF assets are safe because they are owned by a different entity.  (Law suits are raised against an entity such as a person or a company).

    This is not correct JacM,

    If you as an individual are trustee of the SMSF and you get sued then the assets of the fund are not your property and generally cannot be touched. The Bankruptcy Act has an express exemption in the definition of 'property' so that it does not include assets held on trust for another.

    Why you want a corporate trustee of a trust, including a SMSF, is because of the asset protection if the trust itself is sued. Say a tenant falls out of the window that was not properly fixed in a rental property. The tenant would sue the owner which is the trustee. The trustee would be you or the company. If they win you would have pay them $x, but you would have a right for this to be paid for out of the assets of the trust. If the trust assets are not enough then you still have to pay. That is why it shoudn't be you, but a company.

    There are heaps of other reasons as well – such as death, passing on control of the fund etc.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Ah, give em a new deposit book to make it easier to pay the rent!

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Your lawyer is not really correct. They can accept offers and there is no requirement for going to auction, but an auction is a good indiciation that it went for market value.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    I think you should find out where that money is located asap. Who did you pay it to and what does the contract say about the deposit.

    You may be able to terminate the contract, or rescind it, and get back that deposit.. Have a close read of the whole contract and see what you can find.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    That may cost more than the licence fee!

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Did the lawyer explain about priorities and that your interest would be secondary to any mortgage? You might have a claim against the lawyer – don't worry this is what they are insured for.

    I assume both mortgages were in place before you placed your caveat? (otherwise they probably couldn't have mortgaged). Di you lodge a caveat immediately on exchange of contracts?

    When you say you have a licence agreement – what does this cover and did you also have a contract of sale for the land?

    What state is the property?

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    And, did you seek legal advice before you entered this agreement?

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Sorry Freddie. Don't think you can do much. Probably best to seek legal advice, and take it from there.

    Maybe best to stop paying the vendor now. Write to them and ask them to provide a pay out figure and ask them how much is owing secured on the property – not that they will tell you the truth.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    When entering into an agreement to purchase you would do a title search and find out that the property is mortgaged.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Doesn't sound good.

    The bank will call in the guarantee for the business – if they actually owe money, it could be undrawn (unlikely!)

    If the business failed then they are likely to be in trouble. Even if the are not pursued for company debts they will be for this loan. They are probably unlikely to have the cash to pay for it. Depending on their financial situation they may default on the loan for the property too. If they have other assets they may use these to stay afloat or pay out the overdraft.

    If not then the bank will likely sell the house to recover their debts. You could be first in line to buy but the bank will want the full amount owed to them plus costs.

    The bank's claim on the house will take priority over your claim I am afraid.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    my reply here https://www.propertyinvesting.com/forums/legal-accounting/4346019#comment-271397

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    The vendors won't stop settlement, but their lenders will if they have used the property as security with a mortgage.

    A mortgage lodged before a caveat usually takes priority.

    Is the property owned b the company?

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Its very hard to coordinate a group of people.

    Many things to consider with one of the major ones being liability – if one stops paying the others will need to chip in or all go down together.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

Viewing 20 posts - 3,701 through 3,720 (of 16,319 total)