Forum Replies Created
- Coota wrote:Have emailed a letter of offer to an agent for x dollars which is valid until 5pm Jan 30th,true to form agent has come back with reply below
We will need to provide your offer to the vendors for their consideration as it is below asking price.
In order for your offer to be given the very best chance of acceptance we suggest presenting it in a signed contract of sale accompanied by a cheque.
Now am I correct that this would only give me a 3 day cooling off period once this has been signed?
I was thinking of offering say a $2,000 holding deposit until building inspection,finance approval and bank valuation has been completed as I don't want to go unconditional until this has been all completed which of course will take longer than the 3 day cooling off period.
Am I on the right track?
Appreciate any feedback
Michael
This is a vague offer as all the terms are not included. An agreement to agree maybe.
Having a proper signed contract submitted would make it a serious offer – but if accepted you would be locked in to a contract so seek advice.
You can also agree on many htings such as extending the cooling off period or having it subject to finance. Get your lawyer to add some clauses before you make your offer.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Catalyst wrote:That's why I got you to do mine Terry.Well, I hope it won't be needed for many years. And, I wonder who you really are Catalyst????
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Wills are another DIY thing that the individuals usually stuff up, or do in a less than efficient manner.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Wonder how SMSF trustees ended up investing in these. Wonder what sort of commissions were paid to advisors.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Lawyers actually make more money from the home drafted wills or the will kits as they often lead to expensive litigation. Supreme Court action is not cheap.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
I've seen several people set up trusts incorrectly. They thought they may save money by doing it themselves but each time it has resulted in tens of thousands of dollars in lost tax, legal advice etc to fix.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Looks like the content of that post has been copied from
http://www.barclaymis.com.au/?page=item&title=Break-Lease-Fees-are-Fixed
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
A miight be better to sell the land to his builder friend after the house has been knocked down because the value would be lower – probably wouldn't work out if you were intending to finance it etc.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
not_so_lucky wrote:Tell me about itAlthough the Stamp Duty topic is not about me. Phew!
With the investment property, if the person has owned it for 10 years, but has only lived in it for 5 years, the other 5 years it just sat there, wasn't being rented out or anything. When the person sells the house, will they have to pay 100% of the CGT or 50% because for 50% of the time it was their primary place of residency?
This would depend if it was a main residence first – probably not from your first post.If wasn’t you main residence first then it would be apportioned over time. Once it became the main residence if it was then relet then there would be 2 parts to the calculation. First period would be apportioned over time and the second period would be on the growth after moving out.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Antonio Santolo wrote:T
Why not shame him, it will help others from getting treated like that.I’d get some legal advice before doing this
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
I do some work for House of Wealth sometimes and would recommend them. http://www.houseofwealth.com.au
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
What probably happened was that money had been built up in the trust by investments etc and this money was lent to them as beneficiaries. This is hardly tax avoidance. If I lend a friend money it is not tax avoidance so why would this be tax avoidance?
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
If there is no growth potential there is no point.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
I am a solicitor specialising in wills and estates and CRJ is pretty much correct above.
A will can be changed anytime, providing the person has capacity to do so. When you do your will you should probably conisder that there may not be an opportunity to change it. It may also be partially changed by doing a codicil which is like an annexure. You wouldn't normally do these, but if there is a possibility that the will could be challenged because of capacity it may be better to do this so the main part would be less likely to be challenged.
The person making the will must sign in the presence of two witnesses who should not benefit from the will. If a will is redone you don't need to have the same witnesses.
You should also consider setting up a discretionary trust in your will – testamentary discretionary trust as there are considerable asset protection and tax advantages for those you leave behind.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
wilko1 wrote:Terry, I guess if this lender was to only lend to unit trusts over discretionary trust. What happens when it's the family trust that owns the units of the unit trust?It depends how deep they dig and who the trustee is of the unit trust. They are not really a lender that would be used anyway and this is an unusual policy.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Wait – are these good investments? What is the return after expenses. Would you be better off putting your money in the bank?
What is the CG or loss potential? Think of the opportunity cost. tying up your money. Could you use a SMSF?
Think about other entities lending you the money too.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Yes, the broker is probably aiming for a 4% commission on any house you purchaser upon picking up your photos.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
I have a friend who repossess property for the banks and he is saying that a lot of the lenders are giving much more breathing space to people defaulting now because they are worried about repossessing too many properties at once.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
wilko1 wrote:I've been trying to chase up a answer for this question at most of the big banks but cant seem to find someone who actually knows what they are talking about.My question is Can i use trust income ie family trust to borrow money even if the distributions go to other family members for tax purposes. I thought this would be a pretty clear cut yes but apparently cant seem to find a answer. To elaborate the family trust profit/loss shows a net profit of just under 75,000. So wouldn't this be the figure that the banks are looking at to determine if it has borrowing capacity and not where the distributions end up.
There is no easy answer. If you control the trust by controlling the trustee and appointor roles and the same trust was borrowing again then the income of the trust would generally be taken into account. If you were part of a new trust borrowing then probably would have a harder time.
Most lender assessors don’t really understand trusts so it is sometimes possible to get things done that are not normally doable with trusts.
Also I spoke to a lender the other day who would not lend to discretionary trusts at all, but would to unit trusts. There thinking was like the above, with a discretionary there is no guarantee that any one beneficiary would every get anything.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Prob not a good idea, generally, to own appreciating assets in a company – 30% flat tax, not CGT discount and inflexible. What about all the franking credits with shares? Would largely be wasted.
I would look more closely at trusts.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au