Forum Replies Created
Sounds like you may be able to apply the 6 year CGT exemption for absence from main residence s118-145 ITAA 1997
Treat it as 2 separate preiods, up to hte point you purchased the second residence it could be your main residence. Then it would be subject to CGT from that point on.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Munz wrote:Thanks Terryw. Does that mean the exemption only applies if I add my spouse and not fully transfer to him?Yes for NSW. And I think there has to be no consideration – which would not help the tax position.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
I beleive a member or a related party can lend to a SMSF. But the SMSF cannot give security. A SMSF cannot borrow to acquire an asset either, unless a single acquireable asset and security trustee in place etc.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
NSW has an exemption from stamp duty when transferring from 1 spouse to both spouse – ie adding a spouse to title. But this only applies if main residence and you intend to keep it as the main residence.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
I am not sure what title insurance covers, possibly relates mainly to fraud where someone who doesn't own the property is trying to sell the property.
A caveat registers your interest in the property, and this registration may give you some priority over later interests which are registered after you and before settlement.
Do a goolge on 'black v garnot'. In this case someone put a writ on the title about 30 min before settlement of the property. This gave them priority over the purchaser
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Jean,
No, I don't think there is any legislation requiring this. It is just the banks being overly cautious and trying to cover themselves if things go wrong and then the guarantor starts saying "I didn't know I was a guarantor…."
There are many cases, often involving sons with immigrant parents with English as a second language, where the banks have lost out.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
If the property is in Victoria you may be in luck as 1 spouse can sell to another spouse without stamp duty.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
And a caveat is not a mortgage and offers no security. A caveat is just a notice that someone has an interest in this property and it prevents further dealings such as mortgaging or transferring title.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Benny,
No flexibility. What if you used a discretionary trust with a company trustee. You could then distbute income to lower income beneficiaries and still have the benefit of distributing to a company if you wish. You get flexibility.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
It will still be difficult even if the purchaser has 5% genuine savings.
Are you contemplating taking a 2nd mortgage to secure your money? This could make it harder.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
It would be very difficult for the buyer to get finance if they were relying on that 20%. I don't know any lenders that would allow this.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Copy and paste of my answer from the other forum
hmmm
1. 1 share – what if you want to bring in someone else later on? I wouldn't worry about losing $10 or $100.
I would be more worried about losing the assets of the trust. If the trustee is sued the assets of the trust are at risk, if these are not enough then the assets of the trustee will be exposed. This is why a company is suggested as it limits liability.
Also consider the many instances where directors can be personally liable.
2. Cash in an offset is an asset. It would be exposed and at risk. If the owner takes it out of the offset and moves it, it would still be exposed and at risk. Doesn't matter where it is.
3. If your agent hired a handyman who was not properly licenced then the agent may share some of the blame.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Sounds like a main residence to me.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Brad,
If the properties are in your name at the moment then there would be no units to transfer – I am referring here to units in a unit trust, not apartments.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Oh no the miser account with that miserable bank!
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
If CGT applies, this would be calculated at market value. You will need a valuation for stamp duty purposes.
Consider possible effects on social security paynents if applicable.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
I would generally recommend a fixed unit trust set up. This offers maximum flexibility which is not available to discreitonary trusts. This includes
1. Ability to transfer ownership to a SMSF without stamp duty (stamp duty in some states) and extract money out of super
2. Ability to sell units without changing title or stamp duty (some states)
3. Ability to transfer ownership in stages to reduce CGT
4. Refinancing principal – ability to borrow to pay for private expenses and indirectly claim the interest
5. Land tax threshold in some states – such as in NSW for certain trust set ups if the units are held by an individual.
The units can be held by a discretionary trust for all of the above benefits (except 5) and this will give the same asset protection and tax felxibility as a discretionary trust.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
You can’t count it as your main residence until you have lived in it, usually. There is no time limit in the legislation, as long as you establish it as a your main residence and later move out it could continue to be counted as your main residence – in some instances.
But, if you build or repair a property you may be able to move in later yet still claim it as the main residence from the time you purchased it. s118-150 ITAA
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/itaa1997240/s118.150.htmlIf this section applies you must live in it for 3 months at least.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
If you had actually lived in it first it could be exempt, depending on the circumstances. There is no need to live in it again before selling.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
In NSW you have up to 3 months to pay stamp duty. But if you are borrowing then the lender won't settle until you have paid.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au