Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 2,361 through 2,380 (of 16,319 total)
  • Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    You may live in SA, but where are the investment properties? If in Vic you could transfer without stamp duty.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213
    darkness72 wrote:
    Thanks for the advice,

    Goes to show – speaking to the ATO over the ph – they're not always right, would want it in writing

    Good news – The bank has come through with a deposit loan – so no mixing – woohoo

    ATO phone people are rarely correct!

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    I don't rebate any commissions, in fact I actually charge people who ask me to rebate. They are not the sort of clients that I want, so I am happy if they leave and happy if they stay (and pay a fee!)

    However I do offer many clients extras with discounts or without charge. Good clients often get offered free legal advice or testamentary trust set ups for free etc.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    You can do it all yourself – just like dental surgery or cornia transplants. But it may not be a good idea as you don't know what your don't know.

    I had a client come in and see me about something and in passing he told me he was buying his wife's share of an investment property. However the way he structured it none of the interest on teh loan would have been deductible because of a simple but crucial mistake. Also he was not aware of the succession aspects, but it was the tax mistake that was the biggy.

     

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213
    wilko1 wrote:
    Does anyone know If you own a property outright in your Superfund. (Ie you had a previous non recourse loan that has now paid off)

    Can you take finance out against that property up to 80% again (Ie a new non recourse loan)

    No you cannot. Borrowing can only be done to acquire an asset.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213
    TPI wrote:
    This is a unit trust arrangement that I think most people should stay clear of.

    There are some benefits, but for most people it's overkill.

    It was also promoted under a "hybrid discretionary trust" structure and a "Property Investors Trust".

    I think everyone should beware of statements such as this. It is not correct to say most people should stay clear, perhaps better to say this is something that may not suit most people but there is nothing wrong with this strategy. It is one of many strategies and may be considered.

    It is not the same as a hybrid discretionary trust. completely different.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213
    Tate wrote:
    Terryw wrote:
    CGT is a commonwealth tax so no matter where it is there would be tax payable. Stamp duty is state based, in NSW you would pay 0.6% stamp duty on the transfer of the shares which would be much less than transferring title to the property. Also stamp on shares in private companies are supposed to be abolished at some time – possibly next july.

    Thanks Terry.

    Would the stamp duty abolishment affect all companies established after July next year? Or would it affect companies all companies irrespective of when established?

    Also, do you know how the shares in a private company are valued? Because, when one establishes a company, they issue $1 (or so) shares. What happens if someone sells those shares to someone else for $1? (in terms of CGT and stamp duty calculation)

    Thanks again

    Tate, it would apply to transfer of shares. Establishment date wouldn’t likely affect things – but it may not come in as it was supposed to be abolished 2 years in a row and has been pushed back. Victorian company shares can be transferred without duty i believe.

    Value of shares would depend on the value of the company and this would depend on the value of the land owned by it. For CGT and stamp duty it is the market rate that counts not the transfer amount.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213
    Tate wrote:
    Hi terry,

    Thanks for your reply.

    Regarding:

    Terryw wrote:
    Disposal of shares by a trust would result in CGT and stamp duty in some states. As the discretionary trust must vest then this will result in the CGT down the track too.

    I am in NSW. I'm not sure if CGT and stamp duty applies.

    However, if I understand the situation correctly, the CGT and stamp duty would be payable on the shares, which would be lower in value than the value of the property that is the principle place of residence. Or is that incorrect?

    I'm not in SA, so I don't think the PIT is viable for me. As I said, asset protection is my main concern.

    Thanks

    CGT is a commonwealth tax so no matter where it is there would be tax payable. Stamp duty is state based, in NSW you would pay 0.6% stamp duty on the transfer of the shares which would be much less than transferring title to the property. Also stamp on shares in private companies are supposed to be abolished at some time – possibly next july.

    The PIT is nothing special. Any trust properly set up in SA would potentially have the ability to have no vesting date – however this doesn’t mean they won’t need to vest after 80s

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    The holder of the shares would be the trustee of the trust. This would generally be another company or individual(s).

    Disposal of shares by a trust would result in CGT and stamp duty in some states. As the discretionary trust must vest then this will result in the CGT down the track too.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    There are an infinite number of ways (exaggeration maybe) to set something like this up. It will all depend on heaps of factors:

    – individual circumstances

    – which state

    – stamp duty

    – land tax

    – your family situation

    = asset protection issues

    – succession issues

    – degree of trust

    – equity

    – need to bring in more partners

    etc

    etc

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    If you are doing this as a business then no CGT, just income.

    Parternship of 2 individuals may not be the best idea, depending on the circumstances.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213
    Gibbs wrote:
    Or do you refer to building docs and land docs? The land was a private sale nothing to do with the building company, however the land and the construction has been rolled up into the 1 loan application through bankwest if that helps

    You would have to settle on the land first and then settle on another loan for the construction. This will be paid out in stages as the build progresses.

    Check this with your broker.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213
    Aussiefied wrote:
    hi guys,

    – further, those court listings that were presented, there's no guarantee that there's a property behind the court case

    – further if there was a property it could be in the wife's name, relative name, etc

    There is a guarantee. With any property being repossesed the lender would be suing the owner for possession.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213
    Jpcashflow wrote:
    I think every industry goes through this, people want free advice so they can try and do it them selves just to save a couple of bucks.

    What is funny thought as soon as they try and do it them selves they either loose more money and create further problems.

    That $500.00 saving now cost them tens of thousands of dollars in the long run.

    Ha ha. Yes, I had a client come and see me because they signed a contract to purchase property in a SMSF trusteee name rather than the bare trustee name.

    seen another client with multiple trusts all set up incorrectly and the family had structured things completely wrong, It would be costing them $100,000s I think.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Was the $54k deductible? And if son,  will it always remain deductible?

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    There are 3 ways this could be taxed. It may end up being a combo. It could be treated as capital account unit a certain point and there after on income account. Seek professional addvice

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Under 50sq m?

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

     A trust is a separate entity for tax purposes. If the trust owns property and rents it out the rent must go to the trust. You or the trustee will have to read the trust deed carefully and then distribute the income to the relevant unit holders in accordance with the deed.

    This is very complex area, did you get proper advice?

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Yes, many of the majors do. But you probably won’t be able to find out by ringing up as you would be lucky to speak to someone that knows what a trust is. Best to speak to a broker.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    A trust does not exist as a legal person so it cannot buy property. A trust is just a relationship between the trustee and the beneficiaries. What happens is a trustee buys a property to be held on trust for the benefits of the beneficiaries.

    Now to answer your question, if a trustee buys property and the individual gets the loan then from a tax point of view the trust will claim the interest and not the person.What you may be referring to is where a trustee of a unit trust purchases the property and the unit holder borrows to buy income producing units. Depending on a few things this allows the individual to claim the loss in their personal tax return. ie it indirectly allows negative gearing in a trust.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

Viewing 20 posts - 2,361 through 2,380 (of 16,319 total)