Now am I correct, we pay interest only on the amount drawn from the LOC. Plus the IP mortgage of course.
Some LOC facilities also have an access or facility fee that’s payable regardless of the drawdown.
quote:
Also, is the interest paid on the LOC tax deductablt or (this is were I am really unsure) is it part of my PPOR and not deductable?
As I outlined in the last newsletter. providedyou apply the LOC funds for investment purposes then the interest should be deductible.
quote:
One last question, the LOC has our PPOR as collateral (right?), are we taking any ‘big’ risks with our PPOR or is this the safest way to borrow against the PPOR. Appart from setting up a trust.
Higher debt generally means more risk. What’s important is to be sure to invest in an asset that has a cash-on-cash return in excess of the interest rate you are paying on your LOC. This won’t eliminate the risk, but it will reduce it.
Have a great day,
Steve McKnight
**********
Remember that success comes from doing things differently.
**********
The second to last time I played Monopoly was back in final year Uni. It was a three way battle between me and two other students at my (parent’s) house.
I was blitzing to the extent that the other two guys were about to be blown out of the water. Then they began to collude and ‘swap’ property for no cost to set up control over the board. []
In disgust at the anti-competitive spirit, I got up and walk out, leaving them feeling awkward in my parent’s house. If only Allan Fells was around…
The last time I played was with Julie, my wife. We played a game of ‘strip monopoly’ and let’s just say that I had, er, the last laugh. []
I like the game, but I love investing rules that challenge rather than playing by the book.
Bye,
Steve McKnight
**********
Remember that success comes from doing things differently.
**********
There are usually trust grouping provisions for land tax that means splitting entities offers little benefit.
Still, as the system is not self-assessed, it’s a little bit of ‘catch me if you can’. I’d only set up another entity if the asset protection made it necessary.
Michael – thanks for your excellent posts.
Bye,
Steve McKnight
**********
Remember that success comes from doing things differently.
**********
First off, let me say that while you have purchased a property that I probably wouldn’t have, at least you are in the market and will now benefit from practical experience.
So, to that extent, congratulations on making a decision. Now it will be important to maximise your investment rather than just letting it drift along. I’d be looking to answer the question -“how can I add maximum value for minimum cost?”
Now, to answer your questions:
quote:
1) what will be the tax implications or cashflow effects of having a negatively and positively geared IP?
You will be able to use your property loss to offset your assessable income and reduce the income tax payable on your salary income.
It looks like you will need to pay $100+ per week for the property. A portio of this will come back to you as a tax benefit, but the majority (that is 1 – your marginal tax rate) will be lost and will need to be recouped through capital gains.
quote:
2) will the loan interest on stamp duty be tax deductible?
The loan interest will be providing the property is used for investment purposes. As I understand it, the stamp duty is a capital cost and must be accumluated into your purchase price.
I’d like to know why you feel you want to do the course. That is – what benefit you will recieve that will make the time and cost worth it.
I’m all for ongoing education, however I would just caution you that the course is likely to teach you little about the practicalities of investing and more of the nuts and bolts to the infrastructure that keeps the industry humming along.
As such, unless you plan to work (ie. job) in the field (as opposed to invest) then I’d be more inclined to spend my time ‘in the wild’, rather than the classroom, learning the investing ropes where it counts most… in the marketplace.
Bye,
Steve McKnight
**********
Remember that success comes from doing things differently.
**********
There are two schools of thought on making offers.
School #1 – Volume Means Success
The thought here is that the more offers you make the better. Usually it’s a matter of maybe one or two in a hundred are accepted because the price offered is so low.
School #2 – It’s All About Creating A Deal
This school believes that low-balling is a bad idea as the chances of success are low. Time is an investor’s most important asset and as such, undertaking an activity that has a 98% chance of failing seems futile.
Instead a deal can be sculpted based on the needs of all concerned and as such has a much higher chance to get over the line.
So What Do You Do?
Why not do both?
Personally I belong in the second school because I believe creating a network of agents will lead to longer term success than a ‘wham bam here’s my offer man’ approach.
Yet I still make cheap offers for deals I’m not so thrilled about where I feel that either I or the agent is not interested in forming a long-term relationship.
To answer your question – I couldn’t tell you an actual number, but there are currently:
1. Multiple offers we receive for property we own and which is unofficially for sale (for the right price).
2. Offers we make on wrap properties (yes – contrary to popular rumours, I am still very much active in the wrap market).
3. Offers on multi-million ‘big deal’ +ve cashflow commercial property.
Final thoughts… you won’t catch a fish if you don’t have a line in the water.
Cheers,
Steve McKnight
**********
Remember that success comes from doing things differently.
**********
There has been plenty of press lately about the windfall gain that the Victorian government has pocketed from Stamp Duty in recent years.
The boon has arisen by a circumstance that is very similar to salary ‘bracket creep’ in that while the rates have not increased as such, the rise in the value of properties has meant that more is collected.
I often wonder how the present Vic. government would function but for the massive revenues collected from gambling and stamp duty.
However from an investing perspective, the higher stamp duty just becomes an increased cost to business (the business of property investing).
It’s swings and round-abouts as I see it – in Qld you have to pay the stamp duty within XX days of the contract being signed, in Vic. it is due on settlement. In NSW, property is generally more expensive, so while you pay less in stamp duty, finding a cheap property can be more difficult.
At the end of the day you just need to factor the charge into your number analysis and so long as you’re making headway towards your investing goals – keep your eye on the big picture.
Regards,
Steve McKnight
P.S. Silkwood – thanks for your post and welcome to the community.
**********
Remember that success comes from doing things differently.
**********
It does not matter when you bought the property (unless it was pre-CGT).
It’s very unlikely that you will be eligible to claim an outright deduction for capital improvements.
However, you may be able to either write them down or alternatively depreciate them. Whether or not this is applicable must be discussed with your accountant as the rules are a little tricky.
If the capital costs cannot be depreciated or written off then they may still form part of the property cost base. That is, if you have a property you bought for $80k and you spend $50k renovating it (which is non deductible), then the cost for CGT purposes will be $130k when you sell.
The cost base is then recued to the extent that the expenses are deductible or written off.
Cheers,
Steve McKnight
**********
Remember that success comes from doing things differently.
**********