Forum Replies Created
henry kate?
Generally mdf & plasterboard do absorb water and will be damaged. Products like fibro, timber panelling or aqua-panel will absorb water but will dry out without damage.
Electrics will need a sparky to check.
I think that you'd find it difficult to get a money back guarantee unless you had some very tight KPIs. After all, they will present you with various options which will suit your budget, tastes, size requirements etc but you may not 'like' them.
Generally the costs (from Rawlinsons) exclude things like preliminaries, underground parking, landscaping etc so the rates for units is generally lower than house costs. as the unit would be a one-off youd be looking at using the architecturally designed house solution not a project home (unless one would work on the site).
Personally, I'd rather more than less in the way of promo however it does depend on the area. In some areas one web portal is more effective than the other in other areas it is the flyers out the front of the agency/window display however this relies on people not being computer literate (very old school) but it is very dependent upon the demographics of the area.
If the list is only available on request from the counter, then the tenant can't make an anonymous approach for their research (whether it be web or paper) esp if they already rent through the agency.
I'd disagree with you on one point Jamie, foot traffic is no longer necessary if the bulk of their marketing is web based (plenty of real estate agents in Mosman who don't pay $2000/m2 and prefer a virtual presence).
There will be alot written this year about the advantages of buying property within your smsf (sure you can now borrow for equities or property).
Super allows you to quarantine profits and pay only 15% tax, sometimes less on the entire profits (fund income) and as an added bonus the income becomes tax free once you 'retire'.
See a decent accountant/tax planner for all the info before jumping either way.
Both articles are full of spin – the first highighting that affordability is no worse than 20-30 years ago because you need to measure affordability in a different way, the latter (a survey of 450 franchised real estate agents) saying some areas will increase, some won't, but wider market forces will have a greater impact on prices eg demand, interest rates etc.
If you have a rental property, you are obliged to notify the Office of State Revenue in your state/territory, penalties may apply if you do not notify the OSR. A threshold does apply as pointed out by xdrew – it is available on their website and it is likely that you will fall below the threshold.
Land Tax is assessed as at midnight 31/12 each year – if the property was a rental at this date, then you may be liable for land tax for the entire year (going forward).
Your own home is generally exempt from land tax but theland value of the IP will not.
yes & more
remember to use the correct table. Don’t look @ unit costs you’ll need house costs – totally different scenarios.
AFAIK there isn’t any requirements in the BCA other than having a 2.4m ceiling height.
generally the ba will have more access to sales information than a buyer. They are better able to negotiate terms for the sale if there are special requirements etc.
You’d be pretty hard pushed to find anything below $750 pw & @ the other end up to $3k+ pw
Median price around my way is around $1.5m, % of rentals vs owner occupied is only slightly lower than average. So there are investors (obviously not FHB or avg wage earners in the area).
Rooms with 2.1m ceiling height cannot be classed as habitable rooms ie they must be bathrooms, kitchens, laundry, storage etc.
You will need a DA/CC through council
Wou will need to fire separate the two dwellings & comply with all other provisions of the BCA for the class of construction.They are not 'posing' as valuers, the staff have met the requirements for admission to hold a valuation licence. It is a breach of their real estate licence to hold out that they are something that they are not. If you are that concerned, lodge a complaint with the NSW Office of Fair Trading on 13 32 20 and keep me posted with your success.
Valuer's work on the instructions provided by their client – be it the bank (mortgage valuations), insurance company (insurance valuation), Land Titles Office (land tax valuation), developer (emv) etc.
Many valuers deal solely with mortgage valuations, others portfolio valuations. In the two highlighted R&H are a professional office servicing CRE clients generally, VJR will do your family break-up/estates/some insurance works/occasional development site but the number of valuation clients and vals undertaken is relatively small – pretty much a traditional real estate company with a few valuers who sell as well.
It shouldn't even need to go to mediation if it is reasonably clear (esp in this case as a retail premises). Most real estate agents can't read a retail lease let alone interpret one correctly (according to the RLA) as there are few retail specialists in the field.
Jon,
rather than restate the other post, here's a few more items (it sounds like you've been burnt by buying into a 'hot' market and when it cooled expected to cash in).
jontapp wrote:Now if a valuer conducted a property valuation on this case study e.g. 3 bed, 1 bath B & T on 728sqm lot, with no recent improvements. Median price in Jan 2006 was $200K. Purchase price offer $230K in Mar 2006. $30K price increase (15%) over 3 months. (basic location capital growth/no improvements) Annualised this would be a 60% increase or $120K.The median/average price etc bears little resemblance to the market – you must understand statistical analysis to understand how that median price has been established. Basically, if there were 100 sales in an area, the median price is the 50th sale when all prices are arranged in ascending order. So if 70 sales were of older/smaller/lower priced properties etc then the median would be low, if 70 sales were due to a new supply of home units hitting the market, the median might be artificially high. The mere fact that you have bought a property which is 15% above the median bears little relevance to what it is worth.
Valuers do no set the market, they are impartial. How can someone who is not participating in the market (ie active buyer or active seller) influence the market.
The valuer is working for the bank, not for the purchaser – the valuer must satisfy its client of the value of the property, they are not necessarily using a crystal ball to project any pricing in the future only at the date of sale by using historical data. The bank uses its own expertise to determine whether the information provided then fits its risk profile to lend money on the property.
They exclude out of line sales eg divorces.
Market factors drive prices eg: demand, mining boom, housing shortage, rezoning, government policy.
Is a 60% price variance relevant – yes, no and maybe. Is it sustainable? Probably not. Does it occur? Yes. Why? See above.
Ever heard of due diligence? If you don't know what price you should be paying for comparable properties then what would one expect?
Have you ever purchased shares in a company which was undervalued? Did you get carried away when the price rose to meet market expectations (eg float of the Comm Bank, Tabcorp or T1 etc)? Likewise have you bought overpriced shares because you were told they were a 'good buy' according to some mate or a journo or because everyone else was doing it? Did you get ticked off when they then fell 95% eg Centro.
You cannot absolve yourself of all blame, there are plenty of properties on the market, bull runs & booms don't last forever – someone will always get caught. Property is a long-term investment, even longer in regional centres. Prices will rise, often quite quickly on news of a resources boom coupled with investment then they will go backwards or stagnate, quite often for 10 or more years. This doesn't just apply to regional towns but also places like the Gold Coast, Perth etc – history does repeat itself.
jontapp wrote:I have done some research.There is no national legislation, no national regulation or licensing requirements, no national code of ethics and no national accreditation standards for valuers?
The reason being is that valuers are registered/licensed by the Office of Fair Trading in the state in which they work. Land titles are state-based not nationally governed (Australia is a federation of states).
jontapp wrote:Legislation, regulation, licensing and codes of ethics are state by state. Some states do not have relevant legislation, regulation, licensing or code of ethics. In these states Valuers may be registered members of the Australian Property Institute (API) http://www.propertyinstitute.com.au/The Australian Property Institute comprises members who are Valuers, property managers (Real Estate Agents), property educators, property lawyers, professional property advisors (Real Estate Agents), and analysts, bankers, fund managers, and accountants.
So valuers, real estate agents, developers and lenders all under one umbrella!
The API is essentially the professional body which represents valuers at both the national and state levels. The alternative body is the Australian Institute of Valuers . The API has two branches – general property professionals (AAPI) and valuers (CPV). They are not all in the one category.
jontapp wrote:The API is not regulated by specific legislation and there are only institute penalties if members contravene a code of practice. There is no independant watch dog to regulate these guys.So industry self regulation only, to protect the public and consumers.The API and AIV are private, independent associations just like the REI, Master Builders Association, Australian Institute of Building, Housing Industry Association, CFMEU, Nurses Association, Teachers Association etc. They are governed by their own constitution not by specific legislation(other than ASIC).
They are at the elite end of the spectrum, the industry body which makes representation to government (lobby group for the property industry) at the other end they set the standards for educational requirements/outcomes for Professional Property Degrees, Postgraduate degrees, TAFE courses etc ensuring that their standards are comparable to the Royal Institue of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) etc. Their membership is selective generally requiring a degree in Land Economics as a minimum standard, unlike the REI or EAC who will accept the uneducated masses of real estate agents.
jontapp wrote:This industry is not like other professional industries that have national legislation, national regulation, national standards, national code of ethics etc e.g. see the Australian Health Practioners Regulation Agency http://www.ahpra.gov.au/ and the Medical Board of Australia http://www.medicalboard.gov.au/Based on my research there are limited or nil legal penalties if valuers get it wrong or seen to act in the best interest of other parties (lenders, developers etc).
Valuation is not a science – it requires an understanding of market conditions, up to date information for market analysis, a highly analytical mind, understanding of town planning and the ability to make skilled/relevant assumptions. They are not swayed by emotion (like heated bidding at an auction), have the benefit of hindsight (rely on facts, market data, historical sales information not trends or crystal balls) and carry professional indemnity insurance (very hard to prove that the valuer got it wrong unless they excluded specific comparable properties without good cause).
Valuations are provided for the benefit of the party who has engaged them (valid for up to 3 months depending upon market condition), it is then up to the valuer to agree to extend that liability to other parties not for a purchaser to assume that the englobo valuation provided to the bank for mortgage purposes (prior to the commencement of construction several years ago) has been done to the same exacting standards as a valuation which has been instructed by a purchaser of a specific unit.
jontapp wrote:At this point in time the Valuer Industry offers all care and no responsibility..Not alot of protection for the consumer?
Consumer protection is provided through licensing – all valuers must be licensed through the relevant Office of Fair Trading, they must meet educational requirements which are legislated in each state. There are penalties which can be enforced by the OFT.
PS: I am not a member of either the API or AIV.
From 'The Australian':
Prestige Queensland property market 'to be hit hardest'