Management/Agency Agreements usually have a one month notice period for termination – you cannot terminate at the drop of a hat (or a change in the direction of the wind).
Costs – the agent has spent money on advertising either hard copy or internet, these are part of the reimbursable costs to the agent regardless of whether or not they have found a tenant.
The property has been on the market for a month – this is not unusual even in periods of low vacancy. Prospects are just that, potential tenants, they do fall over for all sorts of reasons, the agent is doing its job.
You can advise the agent that you have withdrawn the property – be honest. You may have to pay a letting fee regardless.
On the other hand, willyour family member make a better tenant?
Ajay, add to yours: the extent of activity of FHB in the market having brought forward their purchases due to the low cost of funds. We may not see the 20%+ corrections overall however the removal of the incentives will definitely slow the sub-$500k market by 5-10% ie more than the value of the incentives. Mind you, not all of the incentives are lost post-September, only a halving of the Fed funding.
Jean, the biggest issue is that you will not have any equity in the property regardless of how much you are paying back to the vendor until the vendor transfers the title into your name. Can you not get finance through traditional means or another acceptable vendor finance deal?
Generally, you do not need to be registered for gst if you are a sole trader/partnership dealing in residential property however if you were a company it may be a different situation (although the $75k threshold would apply).
You would be claiming the 'grossed up' ie actual amount paid for your expenses ie the $11 dollars that it may cost not the $10 and offsetting any gst inputs against gst claimed.
Also look at the Department of Fair Trading/Consumer Affairs etc in your state for issues relating to this type of ownership. I am assuming this is some form of 'rent to buy' or the like. The biggest risks being if you are in default then you lose anything/money that you have put into the property as you do not appear on the title except by way of a caveat (if the vendor permits one to be lodged) and also a risk in the case of vendor mortgage defaults where you would become the bank's tenant.
Sack them both as they are both meant to be capable of drafting an easement burdening one property and benefitting the other. Usually the surveyor drafts the clause & the lawyer checks it for compliance. In this case I'd say that neither of them are adequately experienced in this part of land law.
It is always best whether it is for old or newer units. You never know whether the body corporate is harmonious, whether it ends up in a fistfight or if there will be special levies on the horizon eg fire safety upgrades, broken sewers, new roof etc
In Sydney, there have been issues with BC being too cumbersome, unable to raise levies or totally ineffective – it is better to know what you are getting yourself into.
Yes. If you own you home in your own names ie not a trust etc, then there is no benefit on the interest paid on this loan – so you may be better off paying out this loan and getting rid of any other 'bad debt' ie non-deductible debt. You can then get finance to pay for any other investment properties and this is classed as 'good debt' with the costs of interest, rates, insurance, maintenance etc going to offset income.
At present the income (if there are few deductions) just gets added to your income and taxed at your MRT.
I was discussing a similar issue with a potential client earlier today. One of his suppliers had provided some top quality product recently from Qld which cost about double what he was previously paying for local goods, then given another kg of a chinese sourced product. The first being the best he had ever tasted, the second left a bitter aftertaste but was acceptable (and less than the original product).
His supplier acknowledged that you don't make your profit in the sale, you make it at the time of purchase. Real estate & development is not different, if you pay too much for the property, you will never make it up.
The cost of licensing in the ACT is almost double than in say NSW. In the ACT it will cost an agent $596 for their licence compared to $315 in NSW. This will obviously contribute to the fees charged.
There is no way of negotiating for these items unless they were deliberately hidden and further inspection was required to uncover them. Your main areas which are negotiable are things like pest infestations/termites, poor building practices/non-compliance otherwise you would be whistling in the wind and any solicitor worth their salt would be telling you that (or charging you $350++ per hour for the privelege).
Miike, I'm not 100% certain of the vaguaries of the Vic tenancy laws but in NSW the tenant reimburses the cost of water usage (where it is metered) and utlilities like gas, power and phone are connected in the tenant's name. In Qld where metering isn't the norm, then there is no cost recovery of water usage (nor any incentive to save water).
Although the agents take no responsibility for the actions of the tenants, I would be pushing the line of their responsibility to you to advise and diligently undertake their duties not just collect theri commission. The cost should come out of the tenants bond.
As to tehe instructions to the agent you have to tread the fine line between what is discriminatory & what is reasonable.
A few questions – did the current agency put the present tenants in place? Did they do a preliminary inspection at the time of taking up the management? Did the agency undertake its obligatory (required) annual property inspections? If they didn't, then they could be in breach of the Fair Trading/VCAT licensing requirements (which state are you in?)
Did the agent take any photos during the tenancy?
This is part of the agent's responsibility, if you can show the previous condition reports showing that the railing was intact, then you can pinpoint the blame and get the agent to take it out of the bond.
Viewing 20 posts - 2,441 through 2,460 (of 3,802 total)