Shirley,
like Terryw I am a little puzzled by NW’s comment. For example, though I am not a tax accountant, I think that the distribution of the capital gains would not be taxable, as it is not ‘income’ but ‘return of capital’.
(See ‘Trust Magic’).
Also, why would it be a bad idea for the trust to pay off a HECS debt for the beneficiary, saving future interest costs?
Terry
Happy Dude,
welcome to the forum. You lend money to the trust – how else is it going to start investing? I believe that if your LOC is at 6%, you can charge the trust 6.25%. Why worry about the small amount of income on say a $30,000 loan to the trust (at 0.25% per annum = $75?) when you consider the benefits, e.g. a $200K property increasing in capital value at say 5% = $10K… Just a cost of doing business.
Establish a separate sub-a/c, e.g. LOC, from your home loan to provide the funds to the trust. This will make your accounting easier.
Read all of Trust Magic .
Terry
Hi skippygirl,
we too have had unexpected costs!
Regarding guarantees: my wife is the sole dirsctor of the trustee company, but the bank would only accept a joint guarantee because all our assets were in joint names. (Refer Terryw’s post).
Cheers
Terry
PS to newbies: there is also lot of info on the Somersoft forum about trusts etc
Originally posted by ANUBIS:
… but as there is only my wife and I and we are already paying top dollar in tax there isn’t any major benefit to us via trusts.
Anubis,
interested in tax-free capital distribution, tax-free travelling allowance on trust business (e.g. looking at holiday homes for investment), etc?
Apparently there is an individual in Aust. who recently received around $17,000,000 tax-free from a trust in one tax year – anyone know the facts?
Terry
Skippygirl,
don’t forget tax-free distributions from the trust: ‘Trust Magic’ p.147.
Dale G-G has said to me that one should almost never pay higher than the 30% tax rate – see Trust Magic p.139.
Perhaps the trust will have to have a very high after-tax income if any benficiary has to pay tax at 48.5%!
Terry
Zimonya,
my earlier post said you can’t be the sole trustee and sole beneficiary; you can be the sole trustee but there must be another beneficiary besides yourself – essentially like a will (a trust has been descrived as a ‘living will’).
As a single person your will has beneficiaries (e,g, your parents) – you do have a will, of course!
Hi Bronny.
In SA your conveyancer can do everything – you probably don’t need a solicitor for a simple private purchase. Just make sure you have a different conveyancer than the vendor.
Terryw is right about the longer settlement, especially with the current industrial action involving the LTO.
Email if you have a question!
Terry
Hi CastleDreamer.
It’s my understanding that you cannot be the sole trustee and the sole beneficiary of a trust – the trust would be invalid. I think the laws relating to trusts say that you you can’t hold something in trust for yourself.
Terry
Hi.
After personal experience, and first-hand knowledge of others, I would avoid partnerships. There are advantages, but a big disadvantage is ‘joint & several liability’. Look at other structures first, as Mel has done!
From the 19th C: “the only ship that’s certain to sink is a partnership”.
Terry
Hi Risky,
welcome to the forum! Either I missed your first post, or I didn’t answer because you didn’t ask a question?!
My tip for newbies is to look back through previous posts and get a feel for the forum. Most newbie’s general Q’s have already been addressed. Also, read all the links on the home page – it may save you time!
Terry
mumof3,
I agree with Peterp and diclem (Sue). Go to the local library and look for books by Anita Bell; also Paul Clitheroe (about personal finance, not property!), Bruce Davis, amongst others.
Read ‘The Richest man in Babylon’ by George Clason if you haven’t yet done so.
Don’t buy the books if you can borrow them – use everything to reduce your card and car loans ASAP.
Terry
Rudy,
I agree with Simon – you would have no obligation to the R/E agent if you haven’t signed anything – he/she approached you.
Don’t be in a hurry to sell. If one developer is interested, then others might well be too.
A thought: instead of selling outright consider a joint venture with the right developer and taking a share of the profit from the development. This should mean that you receive more at the end of the deal.
Remember, you have the cake – the developers want a piece. Keep as much as you can for yourself!
As Simon says (!) see your solicitor first.
Terry
… Many are saying that I will have to stand personally as guarantor for the loan, which will mean that funds borrowed this way would shortly dry up as banks would be reluctant to lend me money when I am guarantor on multiple loans..
Thanks,
Pegasus
I believe Steve McKnight got around this because the lenders did not ask him how many loans he had guaranteed.
Using a trust doesn’t necessarily mean you can buy more properties than you could as an individual.
A trust is used for asset protection and some tax advantages.
You need to provide guarantees until the trust has enough assets to satisfy the lenders.
Terry
Yep, Matt I got them to work. But I had to download three of them a second time.
Cheers
Mel
Melbear, love your posts – always get something from them!
Q: At your usual hourly rate of pay (from your investment activity) what did your download of the book cost?[]
Terry
Alternatively do you know of anyone else who is looking to buy? If you have a friend who is also interested in buying an IP you could both buy each others IP and rent them of each other – this way you have an IP and a friend for a land lord. Your friend lives in your IP you live in theirs. Caution here tho because one of you might want to move or want out and the other might not be happy with that – it is important to have this drawn up on paper so you can both refer to your obligations etc if a split seems likely.
Riffraff, this is probably a theory that doesn’t work in practice. The ATO will look at this and see that there is no commercial purpose for this arrangement, entered into solely to avoid tax, and deem it tax evasion. At the very least they will disallow any tax deductions. Investors would have been doing this years ago, otherwise.
2004: “What the mind of man can conceive and believe, it can achieve, if approved by the ATO.” []
Terry
What if you set up a credit card account in NZ, have all the IP income put in the trust account. Spend in Australia off the NZ credit card and clear the debt with the income from the trust.
My understanding is that this is still regarded as income by the ATO as ‘foreign entity distribution’ or ‘foreign source income’ and should be declared!(p34, Taxpack 2003).
Will someone try it on and see what happens?!
Terry
dougdot,
another way of looking at a strategy: if you work 50hrs per week in fruitgrowing what will the annual return be on that 2500hrs work?
If you worked 50hrs per week on property investing what will be your annual return?
Terry
Michael, I have a different view to you in some aspects:
quote:
‘A couple of others things to think about when moving iP’s into trusts is that when applying for finance banks tend to treat the trust just like a person ie. they will only use 30% of the trust income (rent) to qualify for finance.’
My bank calculated at 70%, the same as an individual.
‘I don’t believe it would be benefical to use you personal income to go guarantor for a trust as it may restrict future opportunities.’
How else is the trust going to get started in investing?
It doesn’t have an income until it has income-producing assets. Your future investing would be through the trust.
‘Personally I plan on waiting until my ip’s are paid off or nearly paid off until I put them into a company/trust structure.’
Doing this surely you miss on all the legitimate tas deductions for the trust on the way, and there are lots that are not available to you as an individual. Plus you pay stamp duty transferring them into the trust later. New IP’s, and other investments, would be bought by the trust.
‘My plan is to put high profit earning ip’s into the trust first and keep property with the most deductions in my name. The first house to go will be my ppor as I wont pay CGT.’
You may be better off using a hydrid discretionary trust, since you can still obtain the benefits (?!) of negative gearing.
‘Just some ideas
Mick INC
PS. I also found that my B(W)ank wouldn’t offer the basic loan package to the trust so you may have to pay slightly higher int rate.
‘
My bank included everything into my Professional’s Package which had existing IP loans – no difference.
Terry