Forum Replies Created
If i could subdivide then I would subdivide and sell off the land and use that money to reinvest in something else that is positive cashflow and would offset your losses on the current property. Or subdivide and sell both and then reinvest
Ryan McLean | On Property
http://onproperty.com.au
Email MeI am proving you wrong. Me and my wife earn a combined income of $40k and are buying 2 properties this month with no money down. Better yet they are positive cashflow.
We use vendor financing to fund our properties and while this limits the properties we can invest in, it also maximizes our investing as we never have to save a deposit. If you have an investment strategy then you can work ways around the high income/work like a dog and save routine so many investors think they HAVE to do.
Ryan McLean | On Property
http://onproperty.com.au
Email MeHey,
Me and my wife earn a combined income of $40,000/year. We have set up a trust and a company and are currently in final negotiations of buying our first property.
I can’t give you legal financial advise, but here is my personal opinion.
You have to look at your investment strategy and whether trusts fit into that. Basically you buy properties in trusts to protect yourself from your own negligence. I buy older properties and thus will always miss one thing or another when it comes to maintenance.
I have set up a company, who acts as the trustee for my trusts. Each individual property I purchase in an individual trust. This offers maximum asset protection. The company costs $212/year to own and doesn’t lodge a tax return (it is a non trading company), the trusts cost $0/year and I do my own tax returns.
Trusts make lending more difficult, as banks prefer you to buy it in your own name (it makes it easier for them to get their money back if the investment goes bad), but it makes you liable.
Buying in a trust is good as if you do something stupid (like run over someone while drink driving) your properties are protected as you don’t “own” them. You own the company that controls them, so if someone sues you they take ownership of the company. You then set up a new company, boot the old company out of the trustee position and reappoint your new company (as far as I am aware). Always see a qualified account though, don’t take my comment as ‘law’.
It is my goal to buy 3 properties this year and be financially free in 5 years. If 5 properties is your goal why not start buy purchasing cheaper properties around the $100k-$200k mark. CashflowInvestor.com.au is a property finder service that finds positive cashflow properties and they have quite a few properties in that price range. They charge a standard monthly subscription fee, but are WAY cheaper than a property broker (who tends to charge $500 upfront and 2% of the purchase price).
Hope this helped
Ryan McLean | On Property
http://onproperty.com.au
Email MeMy question to you would be why do you want to build 3 townhouses? What is your investment strategy?
If you haven’t investing in property before then maybe doing a large development straight off the bat isn’t the best option. I’m not saying you can’t make money doing it, or that you shouldn’t do it (by all means go ahead) but just be careful. If you have never bought a property before there is so much to learn.
It might be a better idea to split up your $220k and buy a couple of cheaper positive cashflow properties first and get to know the ropes of investing in property. Then move onto a development.
Not trying to pull you down, just trying to be helpful
Ryan McLean | On Property
http://onproperty.com.au
Email MeMe and my friend are working on a killer property analysis spreadsheet. It can tell you in 10 seconds whether or not the property is positive cashflow…but it is not available to the public yet….sorry
Ryan McLean | On Property
http://onproperty.com.au
Email Me@ JustinT – Buyers agents can be helpful but their fees are ridiculous. The average investor can’t afford to pay for a buyers agent. Most of them charge at least 2% on your purchase price (which works out to be around $8,000 on a $400,000 property). Plus I find that buyers agents always want to push their own agenda and not try to fit in with your specific investment strategy. I have had a bad run in with a buyers agent who told me I couldn’t invest in positive cashflow property and I was wasting my money. He was pushing his own agenda for high capital growth property.
@ Janrayco – Finding positive cashflow property requires a lot of time and effort to work out how to find them. Try rural towns to start with and avoid single units because the Strata fees usually take away any positive cashflow you may make.
If you want someone to find the properties for you try CashFlowInvestor.com.au it is a subscription based positive cashflow finder service….that was a mouthful. They charge a monthly subscription and no percentage of the purchase price. It is WAY cheaper than a buyers agent.Ryan McLean | On Property
http://onproperty.com.au
Email MeYou can use a positive cashflow property finding service like CashflowInvestor.com.au
It is getting harder and harder to find positive cashflow properties these days, so to have a team of people working to find them for you is a great idea.
I don’t like property brokers as usually there is an upfront fee of at least $500 and then you can to pay them about 2% of top of the purchase price, which on a $400,000 property can be like $8,000. The site above isn’t a broker, its a subscription finder service. Hope some of you will find it useful.Ryan McLean | On Property
http://onproperty.com.au
Email Me