Any sales/commission based industry is difficult to crack. I know it's difficult not to focus on the dollars when going into self employment because we all have to live. However, being driven by money can set you up for failure. If you're passionate, genuinely enjoy what you do and you're good at it – then the money will follow.
If possible (and this isn't for everyone) – maybe consider getting a taste of it on a part-time basis whilst holding down your current job. Others will disagree with me, because ultimately you need to devote all your/time energy in making your business work but with a young family to support, I'd be taking a cautious approach (again that's just me – others will disagree).
Cheers
Jamie
I am 100% with Jamie! Get a part time job doing something similar and see if you like it before you bet the house on your new career choice.
I can't remember who it was but when people came to this business advisor saying "I am going to open a cafe" he told them to go and work at Starbucks first.
First see if you even like making and serving coffee and dealing with the general public on someone else's dime before you invest your life savings into a business only to discover you hate the business.
I worked online in my spare time for 8 year before I left my job to do it full time.
It's a really good idea to speak with your accountant about this.
He'll probably advise you to borrow the money for the build because:
1. The interest is tax deductible
2. The valuation will be less than the cash you'll spend.
It's often better (for tax purposes) to let both dwellings out but you will be up for CGT when/if you plan to sell.
Most of my investors have a 'hold' strategy, where they don't plan to sell in their lifetime. They're going for volume (4- properties+) for a long-term retirement strategy.
Brazen.
I agree. Speak to an accountant. It is too easy for someone in a forum to say "get the loan because it is tax deducible" without understanding your financial situation in full and then giving you advice based on that.
An accountant will help you analyse the tax benefits but more importantly the financial benefits/risks of both decision. You can then see how this all fits in with your financial goals and make the decision that is best for you.
I see and hear every day of the week clients who say i need to buy 20 properties to be comfortable yet if they had 6 all paid off (after the accumulation phase) they would be in a far better net position.
Number of properties are all well and good but if they are highly geared means nothing.
Cheers
Yours in Finance
I also agree with Richard and JacM.
When people say 10 properties what do they really mean? You could buy 10 run down properties in the middle of nowhere for $50k each and only invest $500,000.
It also probably isn't going to help you achieve any financial goals you have for yourself.
Understanding financial goals is important. If you want a certain amount per year in passive income you can start looking for properties that will deliver you passive income (or other investments for that matter).
There is always stocks, businesses and other investments that can help you achieve financial goals as well.
If 10 properties is the goal it is going to be pretty difficult to be open to starting a business that will help you achieve financial freedom. Because while the business may spin off income (potentially nearly passive income if you get someone to run it) you won't be thinking like that because it won't be "10 properties".
I know what you mean Richard, my wife has not really put on weight for 20 years and she asks me every day what happened to my figure. I just tell her that like investments i keep growing in value.
Well down jac and Richard and happy birthday my Richard, but your glad the power come back on to celebrate.
I am so going to use this as I get older. Genius quote.
Many congrats to Richard and Jac. I have't got the magazine yet but i'll be getting it to read over the Christmas break
I just saw a documentary on Bitcoin on Bloomberg, You are right. You have to download every single transaction to buy or transact a bitcoin.
Excellent piece of information. I think bitcoin is not for me.
Thank you.
Bitcoin is a decentralised currency. Meaning you don't have to go through a bank or organisation to use it.
Bitcoin is also designed to become harder and harder to 'mine' as new bitcoins are mined. Therefore it gets exponentially harder to access new bitcoins.
Because it is decentralised whenever you do a transaction you are required to download the ENTIRE log (called a blockchain) of every single bitcoin transaction that has ever occurred.
Bitcoin is less than 5 years old so in the beginning the size of this blockchain was never an issue. Currently it sits at over 12GB!
Can you imagine having to download a 12GB blockchain every time you do a transaction? Wait until this gets up to 1,000GB in a couple of years.
To fix this they will either have to centralise the blockchain (companies could do this for a fee) or change bitcoin completely.
Even the people behind Bitcoin say they haven't decided on a solution yet.
I would be very careful unless you are a super tech nerd and know the ins and outs of this digital currency
This wasn't an issue to begin with but now that Bitcoin has hit the main stream the log is
Basically you CANNOT secure traditional lending on an uninhabitable house. You would either need to borrow equity against another property or gain a construction loan which means you would need to provide detailed costings and plans for the construction to the bank.
If you are doing the reno's yourself it will be even harder to get the loan than if a builder gives you a fixed quote or something.
The part that I don't get is this – WHY does a 50% deposit offer much more incentive to a seller (or RE agent) to offer a 10% discount. My thoughts are "I can see value in a 100% cash offer – it can be a VERY short settlement, leaving the seller to "move on" quickly.
But WHY is a 50% cash deposit much better than the standard 10%? Both would require a loan from a lender, thus delays in settling…..
I figure I must be missing something, as Steve prefaced the paragraph by referring to it as an "advanced strategy". Can anyone shed some more light on this "50% discount" and its benefits? Thanks,
Benny
I just had a thought. Is Steve talking about the AUSTRALIAN market or the AMERICAN market? I know Steve has done quite a bit of investing in the US.
If it is the US market then traditionally a lot of sellers will provide owner financing (providing the loan instead of a bank or traditional lender). So if you were to offer them 50% up front and some other buyer only offered 10% there would literally be a 40% difference in the cash they received up front and thus you may be able to secure a discount.
Because the seller is acting as the lender as well this could easily get you a discount.
But in the Australian market where almost all sales are cash sales (you get the money from the bank and pay the seller cash) the large deposit would have less influence over the purchase price.
Perhaps I am labouring under a delusion, but isn't a seller only entitled to something like 5% or 10% if I were to default – or is it the WHOLE deposit (as I think you are indicating)?. I've never come across this, as I have never put more than 10% down.
Anyway, if the seller is allowed to keep all of a deposit, that pretty much answers my original question. Thanks for taking the time – I appreciate it.
Benny
In most states the only deposit required is that 0.25% deposit before the cooling off period. The rest is up to the contract to state the terms and conditions.
So yes there could be the case if and when you defaulted the owner could keep the 50% deposit. But if I was the buyer I would ensure that I could get my full 50% back if the deal didn't go through.
I believe it may be easier to secure a discount for a urgent seller simply because you have more money so it looks to them like more of a sure deal. A desperate seller rarely wants to gamble on a higher price that could really easily fall apart, so they may be inclined to sell to a person with a large deposit.
But you would still have to go hunting for deal and discounts, it wouldn't just happen because you have a 50% deposit.
A) Now I know that land appreciates but as I am investing with between 200-300K,
I was looking at getting another unit in a small older block within a 25km radius if Melbourne's cbd.
C) My strategy is to buy units in good growth areas, whilst negatively gearing them, look for capital growth in all of them and accumulate profits, rather than buy a house on a big block to develop later.
D) Does this strategy sound profitable? I need some assurance investing in units in good growth areas is still a good way to build a portfolio
Let me address some of your concerns
A) Supply and demand generally determines growth. Although people say "it is the land that appreciates in value" this is not always true. Generally land grows in value as demand increases and the government is not releasing new land. But livable units also increase in value despite their small land ownership if people are in demand for units.
So instead of thinking "land goes up in value" think of things in terms of supply and demand.
Older units will have less depreciation available to you (building depreciation will probably be all dried up) and remember that buying a unit means you are forgoing almost all control over how you manage your costs. That becomes an issue of the body corporate and you only get your vote. If home owners want to spend money on something that won't be good for you as an investor but they outnumber you then you're going to have issues.
C) Negative gearing is easy, especially with units. You have increased costs due to strata costs. You need to work out if the capital gains will offset the negative cash flow enough for it to be worth it.
D) Here is an article I wrote that may help you if you decide to use this strategy – 7 things to check before buying an investment unit – but truthfully if I was you I would look into this strategy in more detail and see if it will actually bank you a profit and if anyone has become rich using this strategy. Sounds to me like you may acting out of fear a little bit and want to secure housing close to the CBD as you know the area and think it is safe.
Become a smarter investor through education and the world will open up to you.
Personally I like to stick within 20Kms CBD and to find a positive cash flow property is impossible within this range.
I don't like to invest my money in outer range suburbs as their are some issues regarding capital growth, tenants and too much land available. If you can find a positive cash flow property around CBD area..Good luck.
All the best!!
Positive cash flow property is not impossible to find within the range. Granted it is not easy to find and often you need to create it yourself, but I have seen it and it is possible.
You have to be willing to do TONNES of research and only buy for the right property though.
you can only count one residence as your main residence at any one time.
A question for you Terry:
What happens if the husband is living in Brisbane but the wife is living in Sydney. Assuming both properties were jointly owned (in both their names) would they be able to claim PPOR for both properties (as technically it is their PPOR and not being rented out) or could they only claim it for one property?
It really would be an easy solution to simply leave the toilet as is.
Then remove the extra toilet from the bathroom and put in a shower in it's place so you have a free standing shower and free standing bathroom.
Then you have the benefit that at least the toilet is separate from the bathroom. Meaning a woman can do her make up while her man does his business without them disturbing each other.
I do think a second toilet in the bathroom right next to the other toilet could be a bit of overkill. But then in my house I have an ensuite bathroom with toilet and a stand alone toilet up stairs next to the main bathroom and I like having 2 toilets.