You are quite correct, there are risks involved with the <$40K properties (and there is usually a reason why they are that cheap). However, there are risks with all properties, just because lower priced ones have a different risk profile than higher priced ones doesn’t necessarily mean they are riskier overall (if you…[Read more]
Mangakino, pretty much what others have said. Seems to be high crime and unemployment. Also a lot of leasehold land which changes the sums a bit. There would certainly be some opportunities there but probably at a higher risk.
Kawerau, As muppet said it’s a one industry town with quite high unemployment. It is…[Read more]
You’ve been given some good advice here so far. I’d just like to back up what westan said. If you’re looking at the lower (<$35K) end of the market you really need to take some time to go over and have a look around to get the feel for the different towns. Some towns have a completely different feel when you’re actually on the…[Read more]
Positive cashflow property is much more about the tenant (as that is where your cashflow comes from), whereas negatively geared property is more about the property (capital gains).
That’s my understanding as well (48.5%). But as Terry pointed out the distribution does not have to be a physical payment – just a journal entry in the trust’s records.
Non cash deductions are deductions for expenses which you haven’t had to physically pay for in cash. The main quoted one is the 2.5% building allowance for property built since 1987. This means you can claim 2.5% of the original construction cost of the building each year over a 40year period. eg: if you buy a new $160K property and…[Read more]
quote:Remember that the difference between gearing and cashflow is that cashflow is profitability without considering tax deductions, and gearing is profitability taking into account tax deductions
Crashy, Ireckon you’ve got this the wrong way around.
Whether a property is positive or negatively geared is the situation before any tax deductions…[Read more]
As I said in my first post the numbers are borderline for positive cashflow. Any excessive renovation costs could really destroy your return. Billfromoz is 100% right, you really need to know exactly what your costs are going to be before the auction. As a first IP in an area you’re not that familiar with I’d probably give it a miss.
It really comes down to your own personality as to the level of direct involvement you want with the tenant. I don’t go out of my way to meet my tenants (some I’ve never met), but I certainly don’t avoid them either. Those I have met, usually when doing an inspection or some minor maintenance, don’t have my direct contact details. So if they want…[Read more]
A good PM is a goldmine of information. If you can manage to talk to one when there isn’t a salesperson looking over their shoulder you should get the real facts. They should also be able to let you know what makes a difference. In some places a garage will make a difference to the ease of renting (and the weekly rent) in others…[Read more]
If you’re aiming for positive cashflow then it sounds like a borderline proposition. If the $70K is under the “real” value and/or you expect good capital growth then it may be a goer.
I haven’t done any LO’s (so my opinion is probably worth nothing []) but I would have thought that most are done without the involvement of everyday RE agents. I would think their lack of enthusiasm is based on a lack of knowledge. If this is the path you want to follow you’ll probably have to find someone who’s already doing LO’s…[Read more]
This question has been asked a few times recently, If you do a search you’ll find plenty of recommendations. Personally, I’ve been pleased with the results I got from Deppro.