I am glad you are not convinced. You have an excellent interest rate when comparing to the current rates. A Line of Credit would not even be my choice if I was forced to make one. A loan with offset account would serve you much better.
If you want to pay your loan off quicker while in a fixed rate period, check your loan documents to see what additional payments you can make without incurring any penalty. At the rate you are currently paying, I don’t think you would pay any penalties even if you refinanced.
After the fixed rate period, look at changing the structure to an offset.
Seriously Jie, don’t cancel the appointment. Just don’t pay them any money. Negative gearing is the old way to invest. It is the easiest type of property investing there is. More often than not, investors are being ‘guided’ into crappy properties the seminar presenters get huge kick-backs from. Attending the appointment will still be a good learning experience if not one about what NOT to do.
Don’t get too excited yet. The scenario I outlined was dependent on the properties NOT being cross-collateralised.
Your only option, if your current lender will not let you borrow more than 80% LVR, is to seek out another lender who will let you borrow 90% or even 95%. You will definately be up for LMI but you don’t mind. I didn’t miss that.
Many of the brokers here can refinance you out of the current situation into a higher LVR across your two existing and your third property. Just make sure your structuring is correct so you don’t encounter the same problem.
Their profile looks fantastic. I have looked at them very closely and they offer great support. I have done a bit of travelling to London, Paris, Marseille, Amsterdam, Bali and extensively around Australia so I have that covered. Also have two passports.. Aus. and Euro. A big bonus.
The problem is they do not respond very quickly to online applications. It has been a week with nothing heard. Very annoying!
I will be looking to other companies starting Monday but I prefer the bigger companies as they offer many more options for growth.
Besides your properties apparntly being cross-collateralised, which you still have not confirmed or denied, you might be facing serviceability issues.
If your properties are NOT cross collaterilsed, it is a simple matter of increasing the loan on your first IP to 80% and also borrowing 80% against the new property. This assumes you can service the additional debt and you don’t want to pay LMI.
Without providing all the information, you cannot be given the correct advice.
ARE THE PROPERTIES CROSS-COLLATERALISED (ie: one loan over both existing properties or they are linked as security)??????
Friends tell me it is a fun field to work in. You don’t have everyone lying to you all the time as there is no reason to and they are usually happy to be going on holiday. I am also told it can be stressful if things go wrong regarding a booking or trip but this will be dealt with as it comes. I still have to get a run first as I have no training. Flight Centre would be nice!
The 1% to 99% split between husband and wife has always had me baffled. Regardless whether you or his name is on each other’s title, you still own half or more. While your name is on title, you will be liable for the debt on the property.
To get a low doc loan, you would need to lie about how much income you earn. The only other alternative is no doc loans which require in most cases a 35% deposit or more but you do not need to lie on the application regarding your income. You do not need to state any income figure.
No-one can answer your question. How much is the property price you are looking at? What type of property is it? Where is it located? What is your financial situation? Do you have any savings? What is your work history and income?
Some people do not need any deposit while others need 35% of the purchase price.
First Home Buyer information is available at http://www.fhog.info. Other information is available by doing searches in this site. You should read a lot more before making any decisions so you get an idea of what is required.
Offsetting non-deductible debt is fantastic. As long as you ensure all your income (both of you) and all rental income goes directly into the offset account, you should make good inroads. There really is no benefit borrowing from the IP just to feel a bit more comfortable.
Alternatively, borrowing against the IP to fund additional cash-flow positive investments will help reduce the non-dedictible debt even quicker. If your wife can see this as the better option, hopefully she will go for it.
Of course, if properties are not rented, you could get into some trouble.
I don’t think they “prefer” the first option. I just think they pay the first option not knowing there is a second option or thinking they are getting the second option ‘price’.
I do not see any reason why you would borrow against an investment to pay down non-deductible debt. All you will be doing is adding unnecessary expenses in the form of loan application and fees and charges.
The comfort excuse is of no significance because if things go sour, you can sell the investment and pay down the debt on your PPOR.
If you are concerned about your PPOR, I would look at the structure on that loan and keep the investment and developing options totally separate.