carolsha, since when does a real estate agent “draw up a contract”?????
None that I know of do this!!!
In any case, a real estate agent will never work as hard for a vendor as the vendor would themselves. Think about the following scenario (other things being equal)…
Agent commission is 2%.
Vendor wants to sell at more than $200,000
Agent finds a buyer pretty quickly at $200,000 and tells vendor.
If vendor sells, agent receives $4,000 and vendor receives $196,000.
What if showing the property for two more weeks and doing some additional work resulted in the sale price being $210,000????
Additional agent commission is $200.
Additional money for vendor is $9,800.
You tell me why an agent would bust their chops for another two weeks doing numerous hours of work for a maximum extra income of $200 when they can take the $4,000 now!!!
Rob, the lad is only 20- his mum might be not yet 40 (I’m 39) Don’t write her off as as a retiree yet! 40 is the new 30, after all.
So will 50 be the new 40 when you are 49??? ))
I apologise if I jumped to conclusions but, when I see welfare, I tend to think the worst. Put the house in both your names and let your mother own something as well!!!!
Negative gearing is the old way of investing. It is commonly said that negative geared properties usually attract higher capital gains. I guess your research will identify the most suitable property for you to buy.
Using an offset account and continuing to invest using the capital gains if holding the property long term would stem any chance of the property becoming positive. The offset will allow you to reduce debt and expenses as required and vice versa.
If you want to be like all other reporters, talk to dmichie. You will end up with your typical run of the mill negative story about the state of the property market.
Personally, I think you should do a positive story talking to some of the more successful investors who make money in all markets and can find those jewels in the rough. There are always great opportunities for those who seek them.
Usually positive investment properties go in the name of the lower income earner and negative imvestment properties go in the name of the higher income earner. It will depend on your tax brackets as you may both be in the highest bracket where it won’t make much difference.
I would be finding another lender as it is common for couple’s to use property held in joint names and purchase an additional property in a single name.
Many of the lenders have 0.7% discount. They are all adjusting their products ever so slightly in an attempt to grab at market share. Just make sure that when you take the 0.7% discount, that it is not on their loaded SVR rate which used to apply to their Portfolio Loan. St George also has a lot of fees for multiple property owners and anything more than 3 properties (or splits), usually sees St George towing the line.
The problem with being upfront focused is that it tends to influence broker advice to send clients to loans paying the most. This is also the case with trail. It is a difficult situation that will not see a remedy any time soon.
No need to believe what I write. Everyone can be wrong regarding their views. I just try to put an opposing view out there for those reading to scrutinise and consider to make a more informed or balanced decision.
I will not attempt to put forward any property strategy for Australia. I have made my decision to get out of Aus property all together. In fact, the only investment in Aus property I will be making in the future will be indirectly.
To me, liquidity is becoming of high importance to take advantage of various opportunities I usually miss out on by holding property directly. Of course, this strategy is definately not for the majority as it is higher risk.
Finally, for someone to say that a person does not know what they are talking about just because they do not own 100 properties or practice what they preach is ridiculous. There are not many out there who do practice what they preach as their risk profile is very different to those they are speaking with.