I don’t know what state you’re in, but when I was buying some in Qld, I put down about $100-$500 from memory to hold 4 houses worth over 300k. The 10% thing wasn’t an issue… cheers.
Yes, we in the media, particularly those of us who have an input into the nightly news, have an agenda to control the economy, and society as a whole. We are soldiers in the army of Kerry and Rupert, and we do want your brains. mmmmm brains….
from richmond, a happy little media member, with very naughty aims of controlling your every thought.
Um, I posted in Sept 2003… as did Westan, as did TerryW, as did numerous others… we just don’t post in the prolific numbers that a few others seem to be able to manage.
Markpatric’s statements like “Maybe money was not a priority in thier life, there are more important things” isn’t foolish, it’s true. (Mind you, money in itself is important in today’s society to meet particular needs and wants)
Now, I’m not on for an argument, so I’ll be off… *whistling*
You’re a smart bloke redwing, you shouldn’t have any probs finding your own deals… unless you’re stretched for time that is, in which case it might be worthwhile leveraging off someone else… I’m not so sure the depreciation angle is the way to go, because you’re still going to eventually limit yourself borrowings wise…
That’s funny, I remember them doing stories only a few months ago about how you could make a fortune in real estate in 5 minutes…
What does this type of story do for Steve’s relationship with TT? Would look weird doing stories on property investing in tandem with property crashes wouldnn’t it?
Anyway, I wouldn’t put any weight at all in a TT story, or an ACA one for that matter… unless the journos/producers themselves actually understood property investing…
It’s more a case of an accountant thinking he was doing the right thing at the time for my wife.
My wife, and she admits this, knows bugger all about finances etc… back when she did her tax return for the first year she had the property, it was rented out for about 6 weeks… the accountant decided to claim all the interest for that year (it settled on March 2001)
So basically, about 6 weeks of interest payments were claimed that shouldn’t have been (approx $1000). I know that the ATO’s views is that SHE declared to them that it was an investment property from day one, but the accountant made the suggestion to do so, and she just went along with it, not knowing any better.. mind you, the CG on the place has been around 200k in the time she’s owned it, so we’ll happily pay any interest penalties, which will be small in comparison…
I rang the ATO and they said it was all no worries… even though she only lived there for a month and a half or so before making it available for rent… trouble is, her accountant at the time claimed interest payments from day one (probably thinking he was doing the wife a favour), so we have to fix that up by writing a letter and paying some money back, but they reckon it’s no worries, since we can validate the fact she was living there easily enough through bills and electoral rolls etc.
I think they were actually taken aback when we rang to tell them “hey, I (wife) got too much money back on a tax return, we want to pay some back”…
Footnote to all this is just to confirm that if you get married and both of you have separate PPORS , you certainly do have only six months to dispose of one of them, if you want to keep the CGT exemption. Of course, for some people, it’s better to just turn one into an IP. I only became aware of that today through Terry, Dale Gatherum Goss and the ATO.
That’s funny Kay, I was thinking the same thing… maybe go out and start up my own courses, slug people a few grand for the honour of hearing me talk, and sell it by telling people it’s tax deductible… how win-win is that? []
r